Quote:
Originally Posted by Nanyika
Originally, the Mall was designed by the city, and as I recall, managed (or at least funded) by the state. I remember how it was presented in the 1950s as a tremendous civic accomplishment. The National Park Service took it over in the 1970s. The Mall was redesigned and reconstructed starting in about 2000.
I liked aspects of the old design, such as the central fountain on Market Street. The photo on the right shows the Mall during the 1976 Bicentennial summer, when a temporary tent theatre was erected on the block north of Market; that was a beautiful addition.
I think that in general the current, more informal, design is brighter and more successful than the old version — at least, on the block between Market and Chestnut. And I like the way the ground now gradually rises to a grassy hill on the northern block (covering the underground parking garage). Nevertheless, the new version of the Mall has a great many faults.
For example, the new buildings (Visitors' Center, Liberty Bell Pavilion, etc.) are unimaginative and create a solid wall along 6th St. The slavery memorial at the President’s House is dull and uninviting. There are no trees or shade on the western edge; even people lining up for the Liberty Bell often have to stand in the sun or rain. The cafe, which is usually closed, is hidden and out of the way. The restrooms are poorly located at the busy corner of 5th & Chestnut; their blank walls block the view of the Mall and Independence Hall, and they often smell. So, I think the redesigned version could use some redesigning.
|
I just don't feel that the new era park is better than the 76 version or even before that.
The fact that they removed all of the trees as well as the fountains, and left just an empty field thats usually 95% empty other than big crowds waiting in line, and events was just poor planning, and if the removal of trees, and benches and fountains was a safety reason due to 9/11, ok I can respect that due to the time, but even the 9/11 memorial has 100+ trees, and more now they could have easily refined the park over the years and added on to it.
Fortunately since it's a blank slate it can be added upon and improved.
That 76 version with the fountain and tent looks amazing, If that was still around it would be a way better place to chill at that Love Park, it would be a known destination, however it is not because it is just a field in front of one of the most historical important places in the USA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDadBuiltThat
My Dad, who worked all over the city, told me that it was in really bad shape. Buildings in poor shape. A lot of dirty businesses, some still using the river, which was also in terrible condition. When I would talk about the loss of history, he tried to get me understand how bad it was and that it was in such bad shape you just couldn't imagine turning into a pleasant historical area.
|
I just don't buy that, maybe if you said the political will and money wasn't there to rehabilitate the area was the case then I can see that, however anything can be fixed as you see examples of 100+ year old structures being rehabbed, and transformed before our eyes now.
There's no way those buildings around the Original capital weren't historical in some way throughout the decades, I mean this was all in the middle of the start of America basically, that whole area should have been preserved.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillyPDX
From a personal family friend that was a very important person into preservation of the area during NPS development, apparently it's a miracle as many original buildings were saved as ended up being saved. It was a big fight for preservationists. So keep in mind, it could be a LOT worse.
|
All it takes is effort, and I mean the worse did happen, the area was literally Razed, Flattened, Urban renewed.