Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasper and one o nin
I can't argue with anything you said. It all comes down to meaning. The former name was not considered acceptable because of what it means to a segment of Canada's population. Again, my point was simply they could have done something bold that has significant meaning tied to Edmonton's genius loci. If it is a choice between Elks and Eagles, I would argue Eagles has more meaning. Eagles are very common to Edmonton. But more importantly, the Eagle is highly revered and has significant meaning to the peoples that have lived here for thousands of years. The Eagle, specifically the Golden and Bald Eagles are revered and sacred among their traditions, culture, and religion. It represents honesty, truth, strength, courage, wisdom, power, and freedom.
Yes, I agree with who cares what John Oliver thinks. But, if you remove the former name for something else, a John Oliver test might tease out why a nickname might not be a good idea. Elks isn't terrible, and I really do like the logo. At the moment, the name has no meaning other than an animal that I have to watch for at dusk when I drive through JNP. Over time, I hope it will come to have meaning - just as the former nickname did. I appreciate your comments ExcaliburKid
|
I liked the idea of the Eagles for a team name as well, but when it comes down to it, it's just a nickname. I get that there are folks out there who are going to pick the name apart no matter what, because you can't please everyone. I'm just glad they finally have this figured out so the fans of the team can move on to hopefully enjoying CFL football again this year.
I really hope the name grows on fans, new and existing. I think keeping the EE was important for the older generation to still feel connected to the new team name, which I would include myself in. It's iconic and I'm glad they kept that aspect.
Go Elks