HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2018, 12:44 AM
Trainguy Trainguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
If you actually look at the proposed approaches for both ends of the new Pattullo it does not take a civil engineer to clearly see that the main span is meant to be 6 lanes. 4 through lanes and 2 add / drop lanes. Having the main span at 4 lanes creates several unnecessary merging pinch points.

Also the Pitt River bridge is completely irrelevant to the Pattullo since they serve completely different corridors (and even cross different rivers). And the Pitt River Bridge doesn’t land in Coquitlam, it lands in Port Coquitlam.

Also the Port Mann is no longer the widest in the world. Also having the the Pattullo land in Coquitlam would make little sense since it is better to have major bridges regularly spaced out along the river. That was a silly argument from New West to begin with and actually highlights my point for why it is troublesome to leave major road and bridge projects up to the cities.
With Horgan fronting the money for the PB, don't count out the 6 lane option. The government doesn't just hand over money without having a say in what is being built. Until a bid for a certain design has been put to tender, anything is possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:26 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.