HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2014, 5:26 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
Mount Royal is great, but sometimes I think it would've been cooler if it had been built up as an "upper town" like Quebec City's.
Yeah ! That's what I've been dreaming of many times
Can you imagine how far Montréal skyline would have been visible !? (232m + 205m) !!

Our towers in Québec city are high, but not so much. But being on a 100m hill makes a huge difference actually !

Montréal : Towers base = +/- 10m + 205m (highest tower) = +/- 215m
Québec city : towers base = +/- 100m + 134m (highest tower) = +/-234m

Roughly has the same ''visibility'' as Montreal's, but not the same impact, because it's far less massive.

But anyway, in Québec city & area, our elevations are very different. Everything, except the area around Galeries de la capitale & Autoroute de la Capitale (A40), peaks at least at 100 meters : Upper-town Québec, Lévis, île d'Orléans and Western, northern & eastern suburbs.
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000

Last edited by FrAnKs; Aug 2, 2014 at 5:38 PM.
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:57 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.