Quote:
Originally Posted by jtrent77
The confusion being who owns and manages the property.
Owning a brand name is about public recognition. I mean for heaven sake, "McDonald" is someone's last name, how is that fair to allow a hamburger shop to control an entire last name and keep people from calling their burger joint "McDonald's Burgers" I mean it's just a last name.
And yes, "at" vs. "on" makes a difference, notice what The Regent is called on its own website. Words mean something. I could continue to explain why but it is clear that y'all are going to take whatever view point you so choose and thus explaining is a waste of typing. So we can carry on and not bother about something that is a moot point anyway as it is over and done with. |
Once again city creek is not a brand-name.. Is the name of the geographical feature.. Just because the LDS church chose to include the name of that geographical feature in the name of their shopping center does not mean that they own it.
So is there going to be confusion about who owns and operates city Creek Canyon??
The truth is that nobody cares who Seasons is owned and operated by.. People are not stupid they know that city creek is not a company... Most people are smart enough to conclude that it's just a name.. Most people know who it's owned by.. The only people who need to concern themselves with who owns the seasons are the people who live here or the people who are considering living here and it's made very clear who owns and operates this place.. To those people.. Nobody else cares.. And even if they did.. Tough 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵.. The LDS church does not own the term City creek and there is no way that you can argue that they do.
Threaded Mode