HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2013, 3:04 PM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bess View Post
There has to be a better way of calculating density than the stats can stats. The denominator (land area in sq kms of the cma) is disconnected from the actual city size. Calgary land area: 5,107 sq kms. Saskatoon land area: 5,204 sq kms? Really? There is a lot of farm land biasing Saskatoon's density numbers down when you consider the actual city fits nicely in a 15km x 15km square (225 sq kms) on google. And Calgary at 5,107 sq kms and Edmonton at 9,426 sq kms.? CMA areas are not suitable for calculating density. The one thing I take away from those statscan density figures is that we have no idea what the density of canadian cities are.
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.