The forum will be temporarily closed soon for maintenance.
    
HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1861  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 7:55 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Milano
From GBL twitter today:


https://twitter.com/GBLArchitects
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1862  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 8:02 AM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,866
Haven't seen these posted anywhere else, but Vancouvermarket has quite a few rezoning applications for Burnaby and in particular Metrotown and Brentwood for highrises and with Hastings, Edmonds town center and SFU getting some midrises and lowrises.

http://www.vancouvermarket.ca/2017/1...-applications/

Seems like the area south of Beresford and the Mall in Metrotown is starting to see some major activity with a 7.1 FAR tower by Intracorp (they did Metroplace) and a couple of towers across the street from each other on Wilson Avenue close to Patterson SKytrain station.
With that FAR, that tower by Intracorp seems like it might be taller than I was expecting for a lot that farther down south from Central Avenue and Beresford. Interesting.

Brentwood's keeping pace with a couple of highrise applications of their own on Dawson street ( I think I had seen this one before somewhere on here) and on Douglas road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1863  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 6:35 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
Seems like the area south of Beresford and the Mall in Metrotown is starting to see some major activity with a 7.1 FAR tower by Intracorp (they did Metroplace) and a couple of towers across the street from each other on Wilson Avenue close to Patterson SKytrain station.
With that FAR, that tower by Intracorp seems like it might be taller than I was expecting for a lot that farther down south from Central Avenue and Beresford. Interesting.
I'm surprised by the Intracorp tower as well. They've been showing the towers being the tallest along Beresford and dropping down to lowrises at Imperial. That site is in approx the middle, and next door to Maywood Park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1864  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 7:22 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,357
Damn, Burnaby keeps delivering! I love seeing more density going up around Wilson Street, as those few blocks are currently a dump. Nice to see another 42-floor tower go up next to Aldynne, although I hope the new one will look better and is taller than Aldynne.

The Intracorp project is split between two sites, so I would think neither of the two towers will be as tall as anything along Beresford? I would expect to see 20-30 floor towers at these locations, which will be perfect scale and transition from Beresford. Already Sun Tower 2 and Gold House 2 are in that scale, so I would assume something similar.

I am really confused by the 2152 & 2172 Douglas Road project which calls for a 147-meter tower. Is the map indicating its location wrong, as on the map the tower would be south of Hwy 1 at the intersection of Canada Way / Gilmore which makes no sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1865  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 10:33 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
I am really confused by the 2152 & 2172 Douglas Road project which calls for a 147-meter tower. Is the map indicating its location wrong, as on the map the tower would be south of Hwy 1 at the intersection of Canada Way / Gilmore which makes no sense.
When I just looked on Google maps it shows it as being south of Lougheed Hwy on Douglas Road near Dawson Street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1866  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 10:36 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
I'm surprised by the Intracorp tower as well. They've been showing the towers being the tallest along Beresford and dropping down to lowrises at Imperial. That site is in approx the middle, and next door to Maywood Park.
Intracorp also owns the lot south of Maywood Park and will be transferring density to its mid-block site and donating the southern lot to add to the park.
So that could account for the variance (?) on height.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1867  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 10:37 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
I'm surprised by the Intracorp tower as well. They've been showing the towers being the tallest along Beresford and dropping down to lowrises at Imperial. That site is in approx the middle, and next door to Maywood Park.

That's what I noticed as well, as I remember from the Metrotown "Downtown" planning concept diagram that the idea was to have Towers peak in height between Kingsway and Beresford, and then taper down in height as you move farther away from the core.

From my understanding in reading that rezoning statement it seems like they might be getting around that somehow by transferring some FAR from the southern lot (Which, I guess they own as well) also marked in that diagram to the northern lot which is where the tower is going to be located.
So as far as the city is concerned, the planned or zoned density for that area remains the same, but just shifted to allow them to build a taller tower than the site-specific zoning (or a rezoning application) would allow.
Whether the city actually accepts that argument is another question altogether since it seems to go against the spirit of what they're trying to achieve.
But these things tend to be smoothed over by concessions and negotiations between the city and the developer. Probably donate a floor or two to the city for some offices of community center clinic or something like that.
Or in this case, donating the southern lot to add to the park.

I'm just not really sure how it would all work, though, but with a 7.1 FAR for a single highrise tower on that lot, you're theoretically looking at a really tall tower.

Last edited by Spr0ckets; Dec 12, 2017 at 10:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1868  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 10:39 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,866
deleted
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1869  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 10:46 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
....

The Intracorp project is split between two sites, so I would think neither of the two towers will be as tall as anything along Beresford? I would expect to see 20-30 floor towers at these locations, which will be perfect scale and transition from Beresford. Already Sun Tower 2 and Gold House 2 are in that scale, so I would assume something similar.

I am really confused by the 2152 & 2172 Douglas Road project which calls for a 147-meter tower. Is the map indicating its location wrong, as on the map the tower would be south of Hwy 1 at the intersection of Canada Way / Gilmore which makes no sense.

The 7.1 FAR they're applying for, for that northern lot alone, suggests that that tower could potentially and may likely be taller than the 20-30 storeys you're thinking, and possibly even taller than some of the Beresford towers.
For comparison, the 2 Wilson street tower rezoning applications are for 5.0 FAR for towers that are looking to be between mid-30's to 40 storeys in height.

It's probably the reason the applications is proposing to transfer density from the Maywood lot (which I guess they also own) to the northern lot.

Of course this all depends on the lot size, how much podium and/or townhomes they're doing and also all assuming relatively average tower floor plate area. (i.e not outsized large and not a skinny tower).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1870  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 10:55 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Don't know where the 7.1 FAR reference from VancouverMarket.ca came from, but the application only mentioned 3.6 FAR:


https://eagenda.burnaby.ca/sirepub/p...0--%20Compiled
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1871  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 11:06 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,696
^The City's staff report indicates a density of 7.1 FAR net density after the density transfer from the Maywood Street lots: https://eagenda.burnaby.ca/sirepub/c...1702575598.pdf (see page 102 of the pdf)

Still not sure where that figure comes from, if you use the numbers in the letter it comes out to 6.6 FAR.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1872  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 1:31 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by phesto View Post
^The City's staff report indicates a density of 7.1 FAR net density after the density transfer from the Maywood Street lots: https://eagenda.burnaby.ca/sirepub/c...1702575598.pdf (see page 102 of the pdf)

Still not sure where that figure comes from, if you use the numbers in the letter it comes out to 6.6 FAR.
You get 3.6 if you average the total sq ftage over the sum total of both sites (total built area over total site area, including donor site).

You get 6.6 if you divide the total sq ftage over just the area of the mid-block sites.

The link you posted isn't working now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1873  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 7:45 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,438
Not sure if this has been posted yet. Looks to be just north of Silhouette on the Burnaby side of North Road.






https://www.onni.com/commercial/reta...55-north-road/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1874  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 7:59 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Wow is that an office tower and a "mall" at the bottom? With the Lougheed town centre completed and the retail plaza next door, residents here will enjoy a lot of convenience. Progressive!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1875  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 8:04 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,994
its the current site of north road plaza, which is all shops and restaurants, wow thats going to be great

its been rumoured a while, its not a mall so much, will just replace all the shops there now with a possible t&t store, save-on-foods is across the street to the south, the area is blessed with grocery stores
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1876  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 8:16 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
its the current site of north road plaza, which is all shops and restaurants, wow thats going to be great

its been rumoured a while, its not a mall so much, will just replace all the shops there now with a possible t&t store, save-on-foods is across the street to the south, the area is blessed with grocery stores
I love using the word (maybe ruffle the feathers of certain fellas). Anywhere where I see a cluster of shops/supermarkets I would consider it a mall, or would you rather it be a shopping centre?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1877  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 8:33 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Looks like another Gold House, but better podium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1878  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2017, 10:28 AM
towerseeker101 towerseeker101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sri View Post
Any INFO on who the builder bought this site, and new development for this site.
It looks like it hasn't sold. It's still listed on the Collier's property listings: http://www.collierscanada.com/21488
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1879  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2017, 3:53 AM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
I love using the word (maybe ruffle the feathers of certain fellas). Anywhere where I see a cluster of shops/supermarkets I would consider it a mall, or would you rather it be a shopping centre?
Well if that's the case then it sounds like most condo towers have a 'mall' in their ground level.

Fantastic news!

I guess this means you will stop your inane crusade now?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1880  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2017, 5:04 AM
BobLoblawsLawBlog's Avatar
BobLoblawsLawBlog BobLoblawsLawBlog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 449
That Onni development looks pretty good. I wish more developers built like that. I've been noticing an increase in highrises with darker glass (not seafoam), which looks much more professional.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:47 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.