HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5961  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2016, 8:11 AM
Stenar's Avatar
Stenar Stenar is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvland View Post
Development is all about unit counts. Less units, less return and less money at the table, hence no subsidized housing. Also it can't go much higher, being a "4 over 1" construction. Four stories of fire treated wood on top of post tensioned concrete decking. It's all the rage nowadays. Go taller and you're into steel construction, which could pencil as condo construction, but not rental. Not until we see $2.50-$3psf in rent.
A 14-story, 48 meter residential building made of wood with no steel supports was just built in Bergen, Norway.

Treet (pronounced tray-uh), which can be translated as either 'The tree' or 'The wood.'
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=716272
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=118002986


Last edited by Stenar; Apr 11, 2016 at 6:27 PM.
     
     
  #5962  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2016, 9:15 AM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,645
Probably the best SLC skyline shot I've seen - just need an updated version:

     
     
  #5963  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2016, 4:24 PM
Utah! Get Me Two! Utah! Get Me Two! is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctobsl View Post
^^^^^^^^
It has stopped, please don't encourage it by referencing it again.

I like how the Hardison (450 East South Temple) project looks similar to the 500 East project.

Anthony

450 East South Temple


500 East


Photos Originally Posted by: linguisize
Hi All:

Long time lurker here guys, finally feeling the need to post (moving to SLC this summer and feeling increasingly invested). Does the design approval process ever even consider street level retail? It is amazing that with this current apartment boom that almost none of the recently completed or under construction projects contain any retail space! This seems like it is just killing the pedestrian experience in a city already struggling with this issue due to unusual street width and block sizes. Many other cities have a requirement for ground level retail and the paucity here is jarring.

*rant over
     
     
  #5964  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2016, 9:14 PM
Utah_Dave Utah_Dave is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 699
Bottom floor retail?

Yeah, a few Seagull books would be nice on the ground floor. Lol. Just kidding. That's too advanced thinking for us here! Welcome to Utah soon my friend. We need more of you here.
     
     
  #5965  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 12:42 AM
TonyAnderson's Avatar
TonyAnderson TonyAnderson is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,788
A couple recent instagems.

@shragesloan


@ldstempleaday
     
     
  #5966  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 12:51 AM
ctobsl's Avatar
ctobsl ctobsl is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 486
^^^^^^^^

Very Nice! Thank you for the photos...
     
     
  #5967  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 1:14 AM
scottharding scottharding is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,681
I love the black & white one.
     
     
  #5968  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 4:26 AM
ThePusherMan's Avatar
ThePusherMan ThePusherMan is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammersklavier View Post
That would be $750-$900 for a 300 sf studio!
I pay 1050 for a 450 sf apartment downtown so we are getting there... Mostly, I'm just getting ripped off. Hell of balcony though.
     
     
  #5969  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 4:27 AM
ToysNoiz's Avatar
ToysNoiz ToysNoiz is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 745
I prefer this angle. It's even better from the 600 South exit off I-15.



I also Like the view looking north from 1-80 on the west side of State Street.
     
     
  #5970  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 11:28 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,797
^^^
I particularly like that view ToysNoiz in the Spring, when there's still a little snow on the tops of the back mountains, and everything has greened up a bit. The layering effect of the benches and mountains as a backdrop is what makes Salt Lake City's setting incomparable as a North Am. Metro.

Also, why would retail be a given at a confluence like South Temple and 500 East? Perhaps, 700 East will make more sense in the future, as Trolley Square and to the north becomes more of an urban corridor. There's a lot of thought that goes into placing any kind of commercial endeavor at the base of an apartment building. Most of Central Salt Lake is much more spread out than Central L.A. as far as density, yet I can point to dozens of new apartment buildings in much denser areas of Los Angeles than S. Temple/500 E. that don't include a commercial element, and for reasons that are pretty obvious to those in the know. Give Central Salt Lake a few more decades to increase it's density. But even with a few more decades of density added, I imagine that the eastern climes of S. Temple will always be a bit more of a quiet zone, and for obvious reasons. People typically pay a higher price to live in that particular area. They want a calmer quieter climate, yet close to the hustle and bustle of the Downtown CBD. There are quieter zones here in Los Angeles on the very dense commercial street of Wilshire Blvd. Much of Wilshire Blvd. resembles South Temple between 2nd E. and West Temple. One substantial area of Wilshire in particular runs thru the toney area of Hancock Park. This area of Hancock Park/Wilshire Blvd. is like a duplicate of much of S. Temple, except for the palm trees of course. People pay a premium to live or live/work in that vicinity. Many apartments or condo mid-rises have gone up recently in this area and others like it, filling in the gaps. However, it is definitely not a given that retail is going to be at street level where the correct figures just don't scratch out. This in simplistic terms, is usually because the existing commercial and pop. demographic does not jive with the need for additional commercial business. It has nothing to do with clueless planners or short sighted business men. On the contrary, they're usually experienced and far more savvy, those that plan these type of business ventures.

Often there is another nearby corridor or section of the same corridor that already meets the current demand of commercial volume. A more commercial type traffic is simply not practical or even desired.

Also remember, The often mentioned restaurant/café business is one very tough, thin profit margin business. Unless you have money to burn, combined with a passion to create your own foodie dreamscape, you are going to run the other way from such an endeavor. This unless of course you have a lot of ready traffic to justify the investment. Even when the location would seem ideal, the food service business can be too time demanding and profit thin, and just overall grueling from the business owners perspective.

Beautiful shot, but hopefully these are becoming rarer and rarer. The CCC additions and 222 aren't even in the mix, let alone 111


.

Last edited by delts145; Apr 11, 2016 at 2:13 PM.
     
     
  #5971  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 2:17 PM
bflatflat9 bflatflat9 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 308
Well said on these topics here.
     
     
  #5972  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 6:37 PM
ryerop ryerop is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 81
So I was messing around on google street view earlier, and if you want something kind of fun to see the changes in Salt Lake a little bit type in 100 s Main street SLC. When you get there go to the middle of the intersection, depending on where you go in the intersection some of the views are older without 111 being built, and some don't have city creek finished yet. Then if you go just even barely over and move the view it will put 111 there and city creek finished. Just was kind of fun to see how great Main is looking with the changes happening on it. If you are bored go try it.
     
     
  #5973  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2016, 8:31 PM
ajiuO's Avatar
ajiuO ajiuO is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,999
Dose any person know if the walker center parking will get s facelift? It is really going to be the last peice of epic ugly left on that street.
     
     
  #5974  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2016, 12:22 AM
asies1981 asies1981 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,173
     
     
  #5975  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2016, 1:10 AM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,134
Asies,
I think you mixed up that office tower with older mid-rise building on South temple that will be renovated with residential units.
     
     
  #5976  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2016, 1:30 AM
ctobsl's Avatar
ctobsl ctobsl is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Asies,
I think you mixed up that office tower with older mid-rise building on South temple that will be renovated with residential units.
I think so too, especially the office tower in the photo as being constructed in 1951. No worries, it happens and I'm sure he will correct it soon.
     
     
  #5977  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2016, 2:48 AM
asies1981 asies1981 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Asies,
I think you mixed up that office tower with older mid-rise building on South temple that will be renovated with residential units.
I did, and it is fixed. Although the Dan Jones building would make for a great adaptive reuse as well, lol. Maybe it is a sign of a future project announcement? (kidding its probably not).
     
     
  #5978  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2016, 12:46 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,797
..................................
     
     
  #5979  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2016, 12:49 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,797
Looking Back : Around Two Years Ago - March 2014


Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Mac View Post
Photo Update from this evening.





























Pics By T-Mac


May 2014

Quote:
Originally Posted by gusam26 View Post

Pic By Gusam26


I remembered seeing a photo of the building that use to occupy the southeast corner of Regent and 1st S. I hadn't been able to find it until now. In general look at how beautiful those buildings were. Not only what use to be on the corner, but especially the third building down, on what is now a parking garage...UGH...I'm extremely happy with what is happening to this block in general. However, I can't help but lament the loss of such beautiful past designs. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for the advent of the planned Regent Hotel. To me, that proposed building would recapture some of Salt Lake's lost 19th Century architectural beauty


.

Last edited by delts145; May 1, 2016 at 10:07 AM.
     
     
  #5980  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2016, 2:04 PM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,645
I think those pics are from 2014. The tower was already rising by May, 2015, and the theater was under construction.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:30 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.