Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanboy
Why doesn't he invest in downtown? This is just more sprawl on agricultural land or open space. If any of you on this forum become billionaires, and want to invest it in a similar way, please invest it in our existing communities with infill and restoration projects, not on sprawled developments on the outskirts town. These just eat up the possibility of a green belt, which would help our air quality, therefore, improving our quality of life.
|
Oh come on, this will be great. There will be more people out there with nice big lawns to water, and a lot of them will commute in their SUVs into Park City or Salt Lake every day. We'll have to widen the roads, of course (see
http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/fullstory.php/aid/647/Road_pricing:_What's_the_deal_.html), but Utah's current ranking as the number one per capita producer of greenhouse gases in the country will be solidified. (see
http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_7133901?source=rv) And it will mean more business for doctors treating respiratory diseases like asthma. (see a bunch of recent pertinent articles here
http://utahmomsforcleanair.org/) And the oil companies will continue to profit, because it will prop up our dependence on oil. Of course, that will increase our dependence on the Middle East, but that will be good for defense contractors and private security firms like Blackwater.
Oh man, I could go on and on. I know some people are rolling their eyes at me right now, but I really think we need to start acknowledging all the direct and indirect costs of sprawl development. The costs are real, and they accumulate and compound.