HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2024, 9:00 PM
Ahoi's Avatar
Ahoi Ahoi is offline
Mulan M.
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 272
Smile NEW YORK | 250 Park Ave | FT | FLOORS

„ While debate rages over the future of the office, one investor is looking for someone bullish enough to build a 1 million square foot tower near Grand Central Terminal.

The 1920s-era building is 76 percent occupied, but AEW has structured the leases so a buyer can terminate them and demolish the edifice. With special permitting bonuses available under the Midtown East rezoning, a new building could be as large as 950,000 square feet.„

https://therealdeal.com/new-york/202...0-park-avenue/
__________________
War is shit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2024, 9:09 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,218
Mark me on the list of no thanks.

I'm afraid we're going too far with the Terminal City teardowns. If Roosevelt is inevitable, so be it, but there is nothing wrong with this original GCT building and it compliments the NYC Building well, stepping down from Bear Stearns and giving Helmsley breathing room. Leave it alone FFS.


250 PARK AV
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2024, 10:13 PM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Deadend town, Flyover State.
Posts: 1,095
Not gonna happen sorry ^
__________________
NYC - 20 Supertalls (including UC)
NYC - Future 2035 supertalls - 45 + not including anything that gets newly proposed between now and then (which will likely put it over 50)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2024, 2:15 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 32,066
Given the location, I really hope the eventual replacement is an iconic supertall.

I always wondered how this building still existed. You'd think it would have gotten demolished in the postwar Mad Men years, replaced by some sober, modernist box.

Not surprised that it's likely a goner, just surprised it lasted this long.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2024, 4:26 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 53,007

Surprised they put this one up for sale. At the CB5 landmarking meeting, it was stated that they were drawing up plans for what could be done with the site. It’s complicated because the lot is larger than the block it sits on. That would cause anything built here to be very tall. I wouldn’t mind if it stayed. But I don’t think anyone buys it without plans for using the site.


Quote:
A spokesperson for Boston-based AEW said the property is in an ideal location a that they’ve already received “significant interest from qualified purchasers.”

The company, headed by CEO Jonathan Martin, has owned the property since the 1980s. It sits between East 46th and 47th Streets, just a short walk north of Grand Central — an area that has become a hotbed of office development.

One block north is JPMorgan’s 2.5 million-square-foot headquarters at 270 Park Avenue, which is scheduled for completion next year. Next to Grand Central, SL Green completed 1.75-million-square-foot One Vanderbilt in 2020, and Scott Rechler’s RXR Realty is working with TF Cornerstone to develop a 2.1 million-square-foot office and hotel at 175 Park Avenue.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2024, 4:33 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 53,007
Details for this particular lot.







FAR of 27.



__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2024, 5:36 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,058
Gorgeous building. Hope it is preserved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2024, 7:54 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 53,007
RXR has talked about the possibility of converting part of the Helmsley Building to residential. This would also be a nice one to convert, but with that pricetag, no way will it be.



Quote:
AEW Capital seeks $350M for Grand Central dev site
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2024, 8:00 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 53,007
















__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2024, 10:18 PM
streetscaper streetscaper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 2,769
hope they don't demolish this beauty.. in this case I'm def NIMBY!
__________________
hmmm....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2024, 10:22 PM
jbermingham123's Avatar
jbermingham123 jbermingham123 is offline
Registered (Nimby Ab)User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego > Great Falls, MT > Denver > St. Louis > Providence, RI > Worcester, MA > Kunming, China > Bay Area > St. Louis > Seattle
Posts: 783
Hoping for a Hearst Tower situation with this one.
__________________
You guys are laughing now but Jacksonville will soon assume its rightful place as the largest and most important city on Earth.

I heard the UN is moving its HQ there. The eiffel tower is moving there soon as well. Elon Musk even decided he didnt want to go to mars anymore after visiting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2024, 11:24 PM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Deadend town, Flyover State.
Posts: 1,095
This is a beautiful building so I'd be fine with it staying how it is, but a Hearst tower kind of thing is probably not happening. The building currently standing is included in the sqft of the development.

In other words to build their tower, they have to demolish the site. Or build something much smaller.
__________________
NYC - 20 Supertalls (including UC)
NYC - Future 2035 supertalls - 45 + not including anything that gets newly proposed between now and then (which will likely put it over 50)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2024, 3:14 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 53,007
Yeah, for the price tag alone, nobody is going to want to buy it just to keep the existing building. It would be ground up development.

It's a nice building, but a larger reason for me wanting it to stay has to do with skyline clutter. We already know the Roosevelt Hotel is going to be redeveloped into a very tall building. Standing in the shadow of 270 Park, it could be a bit much for all three to rub elbows. One would really have to jump out in height. But I like the idea of Vanderbilt and 270 having a little elbow room.

Still, it's a prime site on Park Avenue. Despite not having large floorplates, it could be very attractive as a multi-tenant, even boutique office building.

Some more older photos...















__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2024, 10:45 AM
SkyHigher SkyHigher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 416
Yeh team keep it.

I reckon Metlife will wait until all these towers around are build then come in with a 1700+ footer aka 'Grand Central Tower' for the lol. Either way I expect it to get a reclad and height boost proposal in the next decade.



***Changed my mind......probably get destroyed in an earthquake so best hedge said bets......

Last edited by SkyHigher; Apr 6, 2024 at 2:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2024, 5:10 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 53,007
So much would have to align to get all of the tenants out of MetLife to rebuild that. With a guaranteed tenant for about half the space that will be built, maybe. But we're talking about potentially a HUGE tower. I don't see it happening though.


Between the Roosevelt and 250 Park though, its very much in the cards that two very tall skyscrapers will be competing with 270 Park and Vanderbilt. 250 Park has such a small footprint, it would definitely be a very tall tower, possibly topping even 270 Park.


Current building not ideal compared to new construction.






Roosevelt and 250 Park...



















__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2024, 5:42 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,218
Pan Am being "heightened" is a fantasy.

Re-skin maybe.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2024, 6:43 PM
Ahoi's Avatar
Ahoi Ahoi is offline
Mulan M.
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 272
What did you say, bigger than 270 Park Ave. that would be fantastic.

__________________
War is shit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2024, 11:04 PM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Deadend town, Flyover State.
Posts: 1,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Pan Am being "heightened" is a fantasy.

Re-skin maybe.
Hopefully torn down and replaced with something epic...

As for this site, I actually would love to see Vanderbilt and 270 crowded. It's going to be such an awesome neighborhood with some many extremely tall buildings side by side, directly connected to Grand Central.
__________________
NYC - 20 Supertalls (including UC)
NYC - Future 2035 supertalls - 45 + not including anything that gets newly proposed between now and then (which will likely put it over 50)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2024, 12:39 AM
jbermingham123's Avatar
jbermingham123 jbermingham123 is offline
Registered (Nimby Ab)User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego > Great Falls, MT > Denver > St. Louis > Providence, RI > Worcester, MA > Kunming, China > Bay Area > St. Louis > Seattle
Posts: 783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Pan Am being "heightened" is a fantasy.

Re-skin maybe.
My fantasy since childhood has been for Pan-Am to be replaced by the worlds tallest building
__________________
You guys are laughing now but Jacksonville will soon assume its rightful place as the largest and most important city on Earth.

I heard the UN is moving its HQ there. The eiffel tower is moving there soon as well. Elon Musk even decided he didnt want to go to mars anymore after visiting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2024, 1:27 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 53,007
A couple of years ago when landmarking was discussed, 24 & 52 min in...(from the Roosevelt thread)



Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:07 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.