HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Politics


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 7:22 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,985
What to do with the University Endowment Lands

What say you SSP, should the UEL join the City of Vancouver or become it's own municipality?

Recent high level Provincial study on UEL governance: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/britis...s/governance-powers/uel_final_report.pdf (archived link)
The only conclusion is that the status quo or as a Metro Vancouver service area are not ideal leaving the only options as incorporation into their own municipality or joining another which would be Vancouver.


Image from Province of BC

From the Vancouver Sun:
Quote:
A provincial study suggests the B.C. government wants out of responsibility for the University of B.C. Endowment Lands, possibly opening the door for the community to join the City of Vancouver or become a new municipality.

It presents the case for two “municipalization” scenarios: Joining Vancouver, or going it alone.

On Wednesday, Metro Vancouver’s electoral area committee will vote on whether it agrees with the province’s assessment.
...
In previous discussions, UEL residents have resisted joining Vancouver because their taxes could increase, while the city balked at the infrastructure costs associated with amalgamation.

But the provincial report notes UEL could benefit from Vancouver’s much larger tax base and its ability to apply for senior government grants. On the downside, there could be “immediate increased costs” for some services, as well as issues maintaining UEL’s community identity in a large city.

Becoming a new municipality also has pros and cons, said the report. It would bring benefits like greater local representation and control over taxation, growth and development. Challenges could include increased costs associated with incorporation and a relatively small taxable land base.
https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news...d-responsibility-for-ubc-endowment-lands

Last edited by madog222; May 9, 2023 at 7:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 8:44 AM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Don't annex it to Vancouver. Make it its own municipality.

The UEL is physically separated from Vancouver by Pacific Spirit Park.

The UEL is building a separate municipal center away from Vancouver, and Point Grey residents would likely end up complaining about whatever happens in the University Lands.

IMO, Vancouver should split back to its 1920 borders (I guess with Hastings-Sunrise given to East/South Vancouver) so that it better represents the de-facto divide between the inner suburbs and the urban core (roughly 16th St.)

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 6:00 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,736
Becoming its own municipality would require some interesting looks at representation. Homeowners vs students.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 6:49 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,986
In addition, annexing UBC would probably get Pacific Spirit handed over to the Parks Board, and I'm fairly sure nobody here wants that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 6:51 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
In addition, annexing UBC would probably get Pacific Spirit handed over to the Parks Board, and I'm fairly sure nobody here wants that.
Could it remain a Regional or Provincial park?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 7:03 PM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Could it remain a Regional or Provincial park?
Pac Spirit is alreadypp a regional parkp... pl
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 7:04 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,736
So I've gotten into the report a bit and found the biggest Red Flag I can think of coming up pre and or post becoming an independent municipality.

_______Pop. (%) Age Income Own / Rent
Area A 490 15% 31.9 97,000 $ 65% / 35%
Area B 390 12% 38.6 157,000 $ 82% / 18%
Area C 340 11% 41.6 128,000 $ 74% / 26%
Area D 1,950 62% 26.5 39,000 $ 35% / 65%
TOTAL 3,170 100% 28.8 52,000 $ 46% / 54%
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 7:06 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,985
Pacific Spirit is currently a Metro Vancouver regional park, it should be able to remain that way regardless of what happens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 7:06 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
Don't annex it to Vancouver. Make it its own municipality.

The UEL is physically separated from Vancouver by Pacific Spirit Park.

The UEL is building a separate municipal center away from Vancouver, and Point Grey residents would likely end up complaining about whatever happens in the University Lands.

IMO, Vancouver should split back to its 1920 borders (I guess with Hastings-Sunrise given to East/South Vancouver) so that it better represents the de-facto divide between the inner suburbs and the urban core (roughly 16th St.)
Why would you want further balkanization of Metro Vancouver. We don't need any more pint size municipalities, if anything we should be amalgamating them!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 7:09 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,736
"For the 411 single family properties in UEL, the average assessed value in 2021 was $5.46 million"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 7:52 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,118
The whole are between Chancellor and 16th should be developed into high density housing. Way too much forest and golf courses for too few people. Even Pacific Spirit park is way too big for the number of people it serves.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 8:11 PM
Tysonbrown Tysonbrown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 182
Leave them alone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 8:39 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,703
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
Even Pacific Spirit park is way too big for the number of people it serves.
Imagine complaining that a park is too big.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 8:42 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,986
We can always redevelop the Endowment Land later, after we've densified the thousands of detached homes next to it. The entire point of greenfield land is to keep it in reserve.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 8:50 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
We can always redevelop the Endowment Land later, after we've densified the thousands of detached homes next to it. The entire point of greenfield land is to keep it in reserve.
There’s going to be a multi billion dollar subway running right through the middle of that area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 9:05 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
The whole are between Chancellor and 16th should be developed into high density housing. Way too much forest and golf courses for too few people. Even Pacific Spirit park is way too big for the number of people it serves.
All ze green spaces must be destroyed. Clearcut it, level it and put up a forest of banal 50 story towers. Paradise!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 9:08 PM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,052
Converting it into any sort of hybrid greenspace and residential zoning (what's even the point of zoning any fraction of it commercial?) serves no point besides maintaining that corner of the city as some of the most expensive real estate in the province. It benefits nobody beyond the ultra-wealthy.

Vancouver : We are proud of our large and lush green spaces throughout the city
Also Vancouver: Ugh! Why is this land just doing nothing?? D:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 9:08 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
There’s going to be a multi billion dollar subway running right through the middle of that area.
A subway which could also support campus expansion, or offices, or a stadium or convention centre, or a city zoo, or an airship terminal, or just remain a wildlife preserve. Once it’s low or midrise residential suburbia, it’s staying that way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 9:17 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
There’s going to be a multi billion dollar subway running right through the middle of that area.
By that logic we should develop Central Park in Burnaby?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted May 9, 2023, 9:23 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,985
Calling Pacific Spirit greenfield implies it can be developed, it can't be, it's protected conservation & recreation park land.

The golf course on the other hand can be developed, just not for the next 60 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Politics
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:37 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.