HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 2:05 AM
owenhujb owenhujb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 225
[Burnaby] Metropolis at Metrotown Redevelopment (Downtown Burnaby)

Due to an increasing number of discussions about the demolition and complete redevelopment of Metropolis and Metrotown, I have decided to make a separate thread for this topic.

The ultimate goal is to replace the mall with high rises, plazas, and walkable streets.

So far, the only potential development is the Concord Sears lot on the northeastern parking lot. Also, there have been speculation to an arts/performing center.

More information will be revealed tomorrow during an information session on November 25, at the atrium court in Metrotown Mall.

https://metropolisatmetrotown.com/en/new...is-metrotown-public-information-session/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 4:01 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by owenhujb View Post
Due to an increasing number of discussions about the demolition and complete redevelopment of Metropolis and Metrotown, I have decided to make a separate thread for this topic.

The ultimate goal is to replace the mall with high rises, plazas, and walkable streets.

So far, the only potential development is the Concord Sears lot on the northeastern parking lot. Also, there have been speculation to an arts/performing center.

More information will be revealed tomorrow during an information session on November 25, at the atrium court in Metrotown Mall.

https://metropolisatmetrotown.com/en/new...is-metrotown-public-information-session/
Hey, good thinking! Now the Burnaby thread can get some (relative) peace and quiet.

It could go either way, depending on what Ivanhoe's got in mind... though I'd like to point out that much of Metrotown's attractiveness is from the climate control and open spaces, so I'm hoping the "new" look at least comes as a Euro-like gallery mall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 6:41 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by owenhujb View Post
Due to an increasing number of discussions about the demolition and complete redevelopment of Metropolis and Metrotown, I have decided to make a separate thread for this topic.

The ultimate goal is to replace the mall with high rises, plazas, and walkable streets.

So far, the only potential development is the Concord Sears lot on the northeastern parking lot. Also, there have been speculation to an arts/performing center.

More information will be revealed tomorrow during an information session on November 25, at the atrium court in Metrotown Mall.

https://metropolisatmetrotown.com/en/new...is-metrotown-public-information-session/
I think that Metrotown needs a more defined 'centre' and more chohesion. A main thoroughfare, lined with snazzy buildings, mini-parks, plazas, all great. A "Downtown Metrotown."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 7:40 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,727
Metrotown does not need to be like other North American downtowns, but something more progressive, like what this South Korean city is trying to achieve:

https://www.businessinsider.com/songdo-south-korea-design-2017-11

That should be the long-term plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 7:47 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Metrotown does not need to be like other North American downtowns, but something more progressive, like what this South Korean city is trying to achieve:

https://www.businessinsider.com/songdo-south-korea-design-2017-11

That should be the long-term plan.
If they can build something like that, more power to them. However, it seems unrealistic to plan for a Metrotown without cars. This isn't Seoul, and all we have is Skytrain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 9:55 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,939
I have to concur with trofirhen on this one.

That Songdo model is more than a little bit unrealistic for Metrotown for a whole host of reasons.
For one thing they seem to have been designing this concept from the ground up with the idea of public-transit based/car-less and sustainable livability in mind.

Metrotown's redevelopment will or would be building upon already existing infrastructre and an already existing underlying plan layout that doesn't have all these things in mind, and not all of which would be torn down to accommodate the plan.
It seems the South Korean government already engineered a whole lot of these concepts into their plan early on and have been implementing them as the city kept getting built up.

Metrotown's redevelopment doesn't even seem to be in concert with Translink's own expansion plans (i.e lack of street cars or regional light rail) much less the city's public services (like waste management) which would be necessary to achieve something even remotely approaching that ambitious Songdo plan.

And then there's the different scales of economies in consideration here.
The Metrotown plan is mooted to cost in the region of $6-8 Billion to see it through based on Ivanhoe Cambridge's statement.

That Songdo plan was more in the neighbourhood of $20 Billion USD - that's (over) THREE times what the Metrotown plan is speculated to cost (factoring the Canadian $ to USD conversion rates).

And reading through that article it seems like that project is being built as more of a showcase of what the south Korean govt. would see as an ideal for the rest of the world, rather than a realistic model than can be replicated even elsewhere in Korea much less anywhere else in Asia (outside of Singapore).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 10:23 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
If they can build something like that, more power to them. However, it seems unrealistic to plan for a Metrotown without cars. This isn't Seoul, and all we have is Skytrain.
If Burnaby can build something even remotely like what Songpo is doing, getting rid of Metrotown mall would be the last thing in their mind. Right now the long term plan is to convert Metrotown back into a dinosaur: a relic downtown of the past. I'm not saying that Metrotown should be modelled exactly after Songpo, but merely want to show the direction of where progressive societies are headed versus ours, that's all.

It would be very sad that we are still seved by singlie-line 1980s Expo era skytrain 80 years from now. But with the direction we are heading, we just might be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 12:32 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,872
Again the two options don’t need to be mutually exclusive.

New roads and at grade street retail / pedestrian plazas can be added while retaining a major indoor / climate controlled mall. Such a mall would just be within several large tower podiums connected via skywalks on the 2nd and or 3rd levels.

Why is everything either or when it come to planning in Metro Vancouver?

I feel that Brentwood and Oakridge are on the right path, no reason Metrotown can’t simply do that at a larger scale.

Pacific Centre is another example on how a major mall can exist without destroying the street grade...

This is done all the time in Japan in urban areas.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 1:10 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,407
From Daily Hive.

Metropolis at Metrotown owner reveals first details of massive mall redevelopment
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/metropolis-at-metrotown-redevelopment-principles

Looking at Phase 4 - we'll end up with the residual mall a block away from the SkyTrain Station.


Four phases of the full redevelopment of Metropolis at Metrotown. (Ivanhoe Cambridge)
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/metropolis-at-metrotown-redevelopment-principles


Proposed live events centre on the site of the existing Metrotown bus loop. (Ivanhoe Cambridge)
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/metropolis-at-metrotown-redevelopment-principles

Like Pacific Centre, the various complexes will have underground truck access and loading.
Sounds like there will be interconnected undergound parkades across the whole site
- like Amazing Brentwood and City of Lougheed.


New street grid from the redevelopment of Metropolis at Metrotown. (Ivanhoe Cambridge)
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/metropolis-at-metrotown-redevelopment-principles


New parks and open spaces from the redevelopment of Metropolis at Metrotown. (Ivanhoe Cambridge)
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/metropolis-at-metrotown-redevelopment-principles

Last edited by officedweller; Nov 26, 2019 at 1:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 1:18 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,013
Well, Phases 1 and 2 do make sense...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 1:38 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Well, Phases 1 and 2 do make sense...
I thought the same.

Phase 3 and 4 like of lose it though.

Disconnecting the indoor mall from a direct connection to the station seems really odd...

Again, don’t know why the mall can’t be interconnected through the podiums...
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 1:53 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,013
Right? If you're going to rebuild the mall anyway, why not add a couple of skyways? It's not like Metrotown doesn't have the room (*cough*Pacific*cough*)...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 2:55 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,042
.... and speaking of Metrotown .... please ...... while they're at it ... can they do something to make Kingsway more efficient, smarter looking-while still pedestrian friendly; sleeker, greener ...
That has got to be one of the ugliest stretches of road in all of the metro region.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 3:03 AM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,727
I love it! Basically they have decided to keep a whole chunk and call it the retail core: pretty much the existing foorprint of Metropolis (or most of it). That I'm really really glad. Still losing some of the peripheral parts of the mall at later stages, but hopefully the new retail blocks can more than make up for the losses.

See how different the plan is from how the City envisions it, which I really really detest:

https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/burnaby-metrotown-downtown-plan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 3:11 AM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I thought the same.

Phase 3 and 4 like of lose it though.

Disconnecting the indoor mall from a direct connection to the station seems really odd...

Again, don’t know why the mall can’t be interconnected through the podiums...
I think that still can be done. Not shown on the plan, but hopefully they can be pressured to do that: something like the PATH of Toronto would be awesome, and both overhead and below ground, please!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Again the two options don’t need to be mutually exclusive.

New roads and at grade street retail / pedestrian plazas can be added while retaining a major indoor / climate controlled mall. Such a mall would just be within several large tower podiums connected via skywalks on the 2nd and or 3rd levels.

Why is everything either or when it come to planning in Metro Vancouver?

I feel that Brentwood and Oakridge are on the right path, no reason Metrotown can’t simply do that at a larger scale.

Pacific Centre is another example on how a major mall can exist without destroying the street grade...
Creativity is something hard to come by in these parts of the continent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 3:21 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,387
There is no retail planned to go into the podium of the three tall Sears towers at Kingsway and Nelson? They are there in the diagram but separated from the plan...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 3:25 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,407
Yes, there will be restaurants and retail:

Quote:
Originally Posted by owenhujb View Post
https://vancouversun.com/business/commer...-be-the-regions-tallest-vertical-village

Main points: Approved, 2025 completion, taller than Gilmore Place, at 219.5 Meters. Good news, though I expected it to be in the 220 Meters range. Finally, the tallest building is returning to Metrotown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 4:03 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,945
Developer plans to build 15,000 new homes on Metrotown mall site
Only 4% identified as "affordable" rental, but plans are evolving, says Ivanhoé Cambridge

https://www.burnabynow.com/news/develope...u_YUgTMOsav6a7B2fPldohaWTq99Rnl6eD39EqSQ
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 4:21 AM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
There is no retail planned to go into the podium of the three tall Sears towers at Kingsway and Nelson? They are there in the diagram but separated from the plan...
This.

I was there this evening and let's just say that this plan has lots of question marks and big holes in their concept that need to be addressed, and for which the people answering questions there didn't have any definitive or clear answers themselves (and even admitted this).

There seems to be a 'pick and choose' deal going on with regards to what they're planning on redeveloping versus what they actually can or can't actually do anything with seeing as they don't have as much as as they would seem it to believe.

At the end of the day there are quite a few stakeholders involved in this process who aren't even (as of this stage it seems) actually involved at all, and without their say-so, this plan is on a fast track to nowhere.

Just two examples:-

1) You correctly identified that although they showed the phase 1 towers of the Concord Sears development project on their north parking lot, they don't seem to be shown as part of this concept plan. With good reason obviously since Ivanhoe Cambridge are currently involved in major litigation with Concord in a court case regarding that development.
But at the same time they've indicated the part that would constitute phases 2 and 4 of the Concord Sears development as part of the plan, and yet there's no assurance that Concord will play ball for whatever they're planning for those lots.

2) Secondly, the south side of the mall.
They show the plans for a possible Event space on the location of where the current Bus Loop currently sits.
I thought we had already been through this.
They wanted to develop that lot already and place Metrotower IV or a residential highrise tower there and proposed relocating the bus loop to south of Beresford and both the city and Translink shot down that idea so fast, their heads are still spinning.
So how would they make the city and Translink come around to agreeing to relocate the Bus loop elsewhere in the area but not too far from the Skytrain station? (which is kind of the point for why it's located where it currently is)

Maybe they're proposing to eventually have some sort of combination Public events space and bus loop/transit hub-type deal? (the logistics of the program and functions of these two kinds of spaces operating in essentially the same area is a nightmare to even begin to contemplate.)

The guy I spoke to basically admitted that these are problems they would have to resolve before the plan could go anywhere and at the same time more or less conceded at in it's current state it's more conceptual and abstract than has any level of "concrete-ness" or lucidity.
It's more about throwing ideas out and getting the ball rolling than setting down anything concrete (....at this stage).

We're still early doors, and they're working on a timescale that could see it go as much as 80 years before it's fully realized so they're really working on a timescale that allows them to address these problems.
But they are problems that are not easily (or quickly) resolvable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 4:33 AM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Again the two options don’t need to be mutually exclusive.

New roads and at grade street retail / pedestrian plazas can be added while retaining a major indoor / climate controlled mall. Such a mall would just be within several large tower podiums connected via skywalks on the 2nd and or 3rd levels.

Why is everything either or when it come to planning in Metro Vancouver?

I feel that Brentwood and Oakridge are on the right path, no reason Metrotown can’t simply do that at a larger scale.

Pacific Centre is another example on how a major mall can exist without destroying the street grade...

This is done all the time in Japan in urban areas.
$$$$$$$$$

Money.
Money might be the reason why it can't necessarily be done at a larger scale in a similar way.

At some point in a development project your ROI (Return-on-Investment) begins to approach and hit a point where it you're getting more diminishing returns than bigger profits.
And the bigger the project, the faster that point reaches you.
Ditto the more financially viable (read: profitable) your project already is.

Oakridge and Brentwood are relatively smaller than the Metrotown mall, and in addition were already under-performing malls by the time the redevelopment plans were first mooted. (In fact, Oakridge changed ownership partly for this very reason with the previous ownership being none other than Metropolis current owners).Which means they always had a higher ceiling for a healthy ROI than a Metropolis redevelopment (or a fiscally healthy and massively larger mall) would entail.

It's essentially not an easy one-to-one comparison between a potential Metropolis redevelopment and the redevelopment of those malls (and I'll even throw in Lougheed mall in there too since it too was in the same boat before its own redevelopment plans).

Malls of this scale typically don't undergo major redevelopment like this unless they're on the verge of being failing enterprises (or are already failing).
And when they do (in the event they're not failing malls) it's not usually that extensive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.