HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2018, 2:54 PM
thmx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Jamesville Social Housing Redevelopment | ? | 3 to 20 fl | Approved

Content removed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2018, 6:27 PM
LRTfan LRTfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 773
Love this... the 8-storey options are absolutely the way to go. We can't be wasting prime land like this on squat little 3-4 storey buildings.
Also, it will help set the precedent for a nice 8-storey street wall down James, which lines up perfectly with the other new developments proposed between here and the harbour.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2018, 7:48 PM
lachlanholmes's Avatar
lachlanholmes lachlanholmes is offline
Forever forward.
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 878
Some people on Facebook and Twitter are opposing this based on the splitting of CityHousing units between here and Bay/Cannon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2018, 8:09 PM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by HamiltonForward View Post
Some people on Facebook and Twitter are opposing this based on the splitting of CityHousing units between here and Bay/Cannon.
On which pages? I am curious because I would like to comment with a rebuttal.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3kIXnr9MISIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2018, 9:10 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,786
oh yeah, I'm liking this.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2018, 1:12 AM
LRTfan LRTfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by HamiltonForward View Post
Some people on Facebook and Twitter are opposing this based on the splitting of CityHousing units between here and Bay/Cannon.

Guarantee you it's people who live in cushy well-off neighbourhoods, and not here with the constant threat of gun violence for years. Mixing social housing in amongst market housing is ABSOLUTELY the way to build a healthy city.
And selling a hunk of this land to a private builder is a no-brainer. This is very valuable land now. The city can make a fortune off of it to re-invest in more housing elsewhere. Most people on social media couldn't run a business to save their lives. They think money grows on trees and should be handed out to whoever wants some.

My only feedback is that was absolutely must go with the 8-storey version here, and I'd like to know why Bay/Cannon which is zoned for about 30 floors, would only be built at 6?? Seems a waste. A great opportunity to go taller and add more social housing units AND more market units similar to Regent Park, in a 20+ storey build.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2019, 9:04 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,352
Preferred bidder chosen to redevelop Hamilton’s Jamesville social housing complex
Stoney Creek-based Marz Homes is the preferred bidder to buy and redevelop the prominent block of 91 city-owned townhouses near the James Street GO station, but demolition could stretch beyond 2020.

https://www.thespec.com/news-story/95168...ton-s-jamesville-social-housing-complex/

A preferred bidder is now lined up to redevelop the Jamesville social housing complex, but the empty North End ghost town won't be knocked down for at least a year.

Stoney Creek-based Marz Homes is the preferred bidder to buy and redevelop the prominent block of 91 city-owned townhouses near the James Street GO station.

But a contract is not yet signed, and demolition alone could stretch beyond 2020.


That means Jamesville won't offer relief to Hamilton's growing 6,800-household waiting list for subsidized housing any time soon.

Here are five questions about the much-anticipated project:

What is this project?

The Jamesville complex is 91 family-sized townhouses bounded by MacNab, Ferrie, James and Strachan streets and owned by the city's social housing provider, CityHousing Hamilton (CHH).

The agency wants to sell the land near the GO train station for a mixed-income redevelopment featuring up to 650 condo and rental units, with 45 rentals still owned and subsidized by CHH. The existing townhomes will be demolished.

The agency started slowly emptying the townhomes as far back as 2015 in anticipation of a redevelopment.

This spurred plenty of criticism — particularly with units sitting vacant amid a housing crisis.

The last tenants were relocated early this year. So far, only five households have asked to return to CHH-owned units on the eventually rebuilt Jamesville site.

Other families are expected to go to a new six-storey rental building planned for the corner of Bay and Cannon streets. In total, 45 of the existing subsidized Jamesville units will be relocated here.

When will building start?

Don't hold your breath for construction cranes — even demolition could be a year or two away.

The CityHousing Hamilton board must vote on whether to "qualify" the preferred bid in November, and a contract won't be signed and sealed before May 2020.

The housing agency is responsible for razing the existing townhomes.

But demolition could be a long and complicated process, depending on how much asbestos must be removed from the 50-year-old townhouses. Historical ground contamination also requires study.

"I would like it to start tomorrow, but realistically we can't ignore safety and due diligence," said Ward 2 Coun. Jason Farr, who acknowledged North End residents are eager to see progress on the site.

"For me, this has been a seven-year journey already ... I'm pleased we now have a decision in sight."

In the best-case scenario, the start of the knock-down process is at least a year away.

Why are they doing it?

The cash-strapped social housing agency can't keep up with a growing backlog of repairs to its aging stable of 6,000-plus subsidized units, many located in failing towers or complexes built in the 1970s.

The agency is already selling off single-family homes to raise cash and is looking to partner with private builders to redevelop several properties, including Jamesville and land near Roxborough Park.

"We are land-rich but resource-poor," board chair Chad Collins has said. "This is about making the best use of our assets."

Collins argues redevelopment also allows the agency to invest in "mixed-income" communities, with a combination of subsidized housing and market-rate apartments.

What will it look like?

The public won't get a glimpse of the builder's vision for the 2.3-hectare property until late November.

But this is what we know so far:

Half of the existing 91 rent-geared-to-income social housing units will be replaced on the site, with the remainder relocating nearby.

The winning bidder must provide at least another 45 "affordable" private rental units on top of the subsidized CHH building.

Building heights are uncertain, but existing zoning limits buildings in the area and along James Street North to mid-rise or below. Other developers in the area have applied for exceptions to allow more density, given the proximity to the GO train station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2019, 3:56 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,442
Hopefully this doesn't end up "value engineered" toward higher profit housing. The city has to stand firm on not just preserving the affordable housing supply, but increasing it.

This may be the biggest experiment in creative mixed-income housing that Hamilton has seen. The Roxborough Park development would be the second one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2019, 9:39 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,352
Cheap rent? Indwell aims to boost affordability of city’s massive Jamesville housing redevelopment
The city-owned property is slated to be transformed into 600-plus apartments and condos with at least 15% reserved for affordable housing units

NEWS 04:52 PM by Matthew Van Dongen The Hamilton Spectator
https://www.thespec.com/news-story/96135...assive-jamesville-housing-redevelopment/

Indwell will partner on a heavily-scrutinized redevelopment of city-owned subsidized townhomes in Jamesville.

But the supportive housing agency is vowing to do "much better" than the project's stated affordable housing goal of 15 per cent.

CityHousing Hamilton has been planning for years to sell its 91 aging townhomes near the James Street GO train station for a mixed-income redevelopment featuring hundreds of new condo and rental apartments — with at least 15 per cent reserved for "affordable" housing.

Some housing advocates — including Indwell — urged the city's social housing agency as far back as 2017 to aim for more affordable units given how market rents are skyrocketing in the North End.

Now, Indwell has been revealed as a partner in the consortium approved by the CityHousing Hamilton board Tuesday as the preferred bidder on the project.

Indwell projects director Graham Cubitt said Tuesday he is confident "we can do much better" than the 15 per cent affordable rent target set for the redevelopment.

Cubitt said the exact number and anticipated rent range for the promised "affordable" units must still be set via ongoing confidential negotiations with CityHousing Hamilton and the city planning department.

But he noted in other parts of the city Indwell tries to keep its affordable one-bedroom apartments in the $500-a-month range to meet the needs of Ontario Disability Support Program recipients, for example.

"We are looking at increasing the range of affordable options in this neighbourhood. We want to provide real affordability to people trying to work and live in this community," he said.

Indwell is responsible under the redevelopment partnership for any affordable units on the site other than a 46-unit building that will continue to be owned and operated by CityHousing Hamilton.

Private redevelopment will be handled by Marz Developments and Homes by DeSantis alongside equity partners Fram Building Group Ltd. and Slokker Canada Corp.

More to come.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2019, 11:43 PM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
Shouldn't 100% of these units be affordable? We have a problem...not that I have a solution.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2019, 11:51 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,352
Mixed income is the best way to go forward, it won't lead to the "ghettoization" of the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2019, 11:59 PM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
Agreed.

But my point is that even middle class folks can't truly afford to buy a home anymore. Taking out a $200,000 mortgage is not what I'd call affordable. It's a sh** system.

And while I would prefer the government not get involved with regulating the market, they're complicit in all this nonsense so...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2019, 12:07 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,352
Yeah, I understand. It's almost like they need a second level of affordable housing for middle-class folks, say between $200 to $350,000. Lately it seems any house for sale in Hamilton is $400,000 or up.

Even rent has gone ridiculously high. I know one post-doc from Mac is renting a place near Queen St for $1.5K and it's a shoebox and probably a hundred year old building too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2019, 12:26 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
^Yes, we've created a world where PhDs can't afford to live - not a massive exaggeration. There are neither FT jobs nor housing for people with 10+ years of post-secondary education. It's time to rethink what we're doing both from a housing and an education standpoint...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2019, 3:04 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,807
Lol a $200k mortgage is $900 a month on a standard 25 year amortization.. that could easily be covered by an income of about $40k. Don’t need a post-doc to make that kind of cash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2019, 3:17 PM
king10 king10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 2,776
I’d love a $200k mortgage .

Last edited by king10; Sep 25, 2019 at 3:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2019, 5:03 PM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
Lol a $200k mortgage is $900 a month on a standard 25 year amortization.. that could easily be covered by an income of about $40k. Don’t need a post-doc to make that kind of cash.
You don't own a condo or house do you?

I have a $200k mortgage and firstly, principle is $666/month interest is $500/month which is $1166/month, plus property taxes $250/month beings you to $1416/month.

This doesn't include insurance and potential condo fees. You may also remember there is a stress test, so the interest needs to be calculated at 2% higher. And the bank will not touch you unless all of these costs equal more than 35% of your monthly income. So to afford a $200k mortgage your income needs to be at least $53,000+. The bank also won't like if you're on probation at your new job, if you're on contract, or you haven't worked 2 consecutive years prior.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3kIXnr9MISIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2019, 2:27 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,807
Those bank requirements are all reasonable if they are to trust you with a 25 year mortgage, regardless of amount.

The $900 figure is going off of the best interest rates available today, about 2.6%. It's going to be more with higher interest rates.

And yes, 35% of gross is the general max. Which is $31k annually for a $200k mortgage at 2.6%, with monthly payments of $920.

You have maintenance fees and taxes and whatnot above that, of course, not denying that. $900+300 maintenance and $100 insurance for a condo would result you in a carrying cost of about $1,300 a month. That is still affordable for someone on a $44k salary using the traditional 35% affordability assumption.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2019, 4:13 AM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
Those bank requirements are all reasonable if they are to trust you with a 25 year mortgage, regardless of amount.

The $900 figure is going off of the best interest rates available today, about 2.6%. It's going to be more with higher interest rates.

And yes, 35% of gross is the general max. Which is $31k annually for a $200k mortgage at 2.6%, with monthly payments of $920.

You have maintenance fees and taxes and whatnot above that, of course, not denying that. $900+300 maintenance and $100 insurance for a condo would result you in a carrying cost of about $1,300 a month. That is still affordable for someone on a $44k salary using the traditional 35% affordability assumption.
Look I'm not trying to start shit, but you're wrong. I literally just signed a 25 year $200k mortgage. The bank is never going to give someone making $44k a $200k mortgage. My costs after the mortgage, condo fees, property taxes and insurance are $1600-$1700. You will never get the theoretical lowest interest rate making that little money. And even if you did get your magical scenario, the bank doesn't like 35% that is their potential maximum, they generally aim for 30%-33%

I don't believe you have an ample understanding of how mortgages work.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3kIXnr9MISIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2019, 12:53 PM
HamiltonBoyInToronto HamiltonBoyInToronto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 482
You can both be right ! It depends on the lending interest being charged ....the higher the interest the higher the payment ....
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:40 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.