HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > General Discussion


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2013, 5:51 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,728
Metro Vancouverites Would Prefer a House Over a Condo

Interesting survey that came out last week:

..When asked what type of housing they’d buy if given $1 million, 34 per cent of renters and property owners in the Lower Mainland and Fraser Valley surveyed would rather have a large house and property in a suburban setting, compared with just 12 per cent who would opt for a luxury apartment in the city, according to a Mustel Research Group poll...

..“We were a bit surprised that, despite all the talk about densification and walkability, despite the fact that condos have taken over from houses in many parts of our region, the overwhelming choice was for a large house on a big suburban property,” said Elizabeth Wilson, content editor for REW.

Another surprising find, she said, was that the younger folks — or the so-called GenYs — were the most keen to own a big house and property...


Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/business...#ixzz2P2xHAqjt
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2013, 6:11 PM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Interesting survey that came out last week:

..When asked what type of housing they’d buy if given $1 million, 34 per cent of renters and property owners in the Lower Mainland and Fraser Valley surveyed would rather have a large house and property in a suburban setting, compared with just 12 per cent who would opt for a luxury apartment in the city, according to a Mustel Research Group poll...

..“We were a bit surprised that, despite all the talk about densification and walkability, despite the fact that condos have taken over from houses in many parts of our region, the overwhelming choice was for a large house on a big suburban property,” said Elizabeth Wilson, content editor for REW.

Another surprising find, she said, was that the younger folks — or the so-called GenYs — were the most keen to own a big house and property...


Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/business...#ixzz2P2xHAqjt
They should have added "buy a 10 acre farm with some cows" based on the answers from Surrey/Delta/Langley.

Dumb survey, dumb results.

http://www.rew.ca/news/vancouver-rea...survey-mar2013

And who would actually sit through answering these dumb questions?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2013, 6:27 PM
McPaul McPaul is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 399
Very surprising. I thought the number preferring a large house would be much closer to 100%.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2013, 7:19 PM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
Should have also added "go to a retirement home"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2013, 7:58 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,065
Maybe if condos had a living space that more closely resembled a small house, e.g. - 1400 sq. feet, then maybe more people would consider high density living.

Let's see. 1400 x $500/sq.ft = $700 000. Hmm, 40 000 dollars more expensive than a 7 year old 2800 sq. ft house in New West.

I guess that's why condo developers don't want to sell family sized apartments, because it becomes glaringly apparent what a rip off condo's are.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2013, 8:41 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
I thought I would always be a condo guy but the inconsideration of my neighbours (specifically one across the alley) has made me want to live far away from my fellow Vancouverites.

Still can't stomach a 30+ minute commute though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2013, 8:51 PM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,426
Quote:
The survey shows big differences depending on where people live, and indicates suburbanites are more likely than city slickers to desire the white picket fence life. More than half of the respondents who said they’d buy a big house in the ’burbs already live in Surrey, Delta and Langley.

Of the folks who live in the city of Vancouver, most would go for the cash or the small detached house in the city, and only about 10 per cent said they’d rather have an estate in the burbs.

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/business...#ixzz2P3g0HPIX
So most people already live where they want to... Not particularly surprising.

I would prefer to live in a West Van mansion along the water if my "dreams" came true. In the meantime, my downtown apartment is the current best option for me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2013, 10:25 PM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
I definitely don't want a house. Too much upkeep versus a condo. Though if money was no issue, I could just pay people to take care of stuff around the house so...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2013, 10:50 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is online now
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,186
On the other hand, you have to deal with often moronic strata councils when big things need to be done. I would rather own a house just because of that.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2013, 12:17 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Yes, my strata council is awful. They consistently make poor decisions (e.g. always hiring the cheapest company available, who - surprise - does a horrible half-assed job) and now I have to shell out $9,000 for multiple projects that should've been spread out over the last several years.

The building looked great when I bought it, but the strata president was in my unit and the new one is terrible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2013, 12:51 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
Yes, my strata council is awful. They consistently make poor decisions (e.g. always hiring the cheapest company available, who - surprise - does a horrible half-assed job) and now I have to shell out $9,000 for multiple projects that should've been spread out over the last several years.

The building looked great when I bought it, but the strata president was in my unit and the new one is terrible.
Yeah, I think I mentioned in a previous thread that I've had to put way less money into my pre-war house than most friends who are in post-1970 condos. And that doesn't count the ~$400 monthly maintenance fees they're paying.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2013, 1:58 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
I've lived in both. I gotta say, I'd take house over condo any day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > General Discussion
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:38 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.