Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister F
Fascinating photos. When I see pictures of Iqaluit it always strikes me how bleak and ugly the place is. Dirt and mud everywhere and basically no landscaping or paving, even around the most important buildings. It might sound harsh but to me it looks more like a refugee camp or a colony on the moon than a capital in one of the world's richest countries. Looking at pictures of towns in Greenland, the difference is like night and day.
|
It's kind of hard to landscape where grass and trees don't grow. Paving is extremely expensive and needs to be replaced much more quickly in that climate. It's also important to remember that Iqaluit wasn't even founded until WWII and started off as a US military base. Since it became the capital of Nunavut it has more than doubled in size, so just keeping up with construction of housing and the related infrastructure for new residents and business has been the priority.
Comparitively, Greenland's capital (Nuuk) has been around since the 1880's and has a warmer climate.
Iqaluit might not seem like much through photos. It's quite different to be there. It's sort of a northern Ontario reserve meets Newfoundland fishing village.