HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2009, 3:14 AM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Bylaw 2005-208: mow it all down

It looks like the City is already trying to find a way to backtrack on the idea of mowing down a couple's garden in Constance Bay based on what I saw on the news this evening...

What gets me about all this is that anyone would even bother calling in the bylaw officials in the first place.


http://www.ottawacitizen.com/their+b...684/story.html

Not in their backyard: Bylaw threatens to mow down couple's ecological, back-to-nature, meadow-like yard following complaint

BY PATRICK DARE, THE OTTAWA CITIZENJULY 7, 2009 10:29 PM

OTTAWA — Henry and Vera Jones have a dream of a new kind of backyard, one that is an oasis of nature. But that dream is threatened by a City of Ottawa bylaw that appears to suggest they should mow it all down.

For nine months the Constance Bay couple have been planning a new ecologically tuned garden on their half-acre lot on Allbirch Road. No manicured lawns to be watered, fertilized, cut and weeded. Just lots of flowers, trees and vegetables to create a sanctuary for wildlife, especially the kind that pollinate flowers.

They call it the Allbirch Pollinator Garden. The city calls it a violation under bylaw 2005-208.

A few days ago they got a registered letter from the city saying that their property is in violation of the city's bylaw because they had failed to remove heavy undergrowth, long grass or weeds. The city instructed the couple to cut the long grass on their property by July 8 or risk having the city do the job, then bill them for the work.

They were shocked.

They have planned their return-to-nature garden for many years. They used to live in Nepean and bought their house at Constance Bay a year ago. Henry was a scientist with Fisheries and Oceans and has accumulated a lifetime of concern about what we are doing to the natural world. Vera is an environmentalist who believes that caring for the natural world is a deeply moral issue and that the alternative yard being created is their free expression on that issue.

So their garden is no monochrome piece of Kentucky bluegrass. It's more like a meadow in training, with a diverse array of plants and wildlife. There are some paths mowed, but there is also tall grass, a lot of wildflowers, many perennial plants and trees. They have also planted fruit trees.
The Fletcher Wildlife Garden at the Central Experimental Farm has donated 140 plants and they are being installed.

There is no trimmed lawn because Vera and Henry Jones don't like how lawns suck up precious water, become ecological dead zones that fail to support insects and birds, and sometimes encourage soil erosion.
Their first year with the alternative garden has attracted lots of birds and dragonflies, frogs, pileated woodpeckers, a family of cardinals and large numbers of goldfinches.

Vera concedes that the garden is very much a work in progress. She says it will take many more months before all of the plants have filled in and grown to create a rich meadow that doesn't require watering or significant maintenance and is mowed only once a year, in the spring. When the garden is fully planted, they hope that people will come by and see it, and that the idea of an alternative garden that returns land to nature will spread.

But someone isn't impressed. The city got a complaint about the property and a bylaw inspector visited on June 23 before issuing the order.
Vera says to follow the city's order would mow down nine months of work in a few minutes. "This is anything but a derelict property. The city has more serious issues to deal with."

Henry says the garden project is an attempt to "leave something for the kids of the future," and to mow it down "would be a violation."

Councillor Eli El-Chantiry, who represents West Carleton-March, said Monday that he has asked city bylaw officials to hold back on the complaint until a supervisor in the department has visited the couple's garden.

El-Chantiry said the city's bylaws regarding property standards are a complaint-driven process and complaints cannot be ignored. The city doesn't want to see people neglecting their properties and claiming they are doing it for environmental reasons, he said, but if people are just gardening in a different way, that shouldn't be a problem.

The couple promises a legal fight if the city pushes the matter. They say they have a growing group of supporters, some with legal expertise, who want this new kind of garden to flourish.

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen


Maria Cook has an entry about this topic generally:

http://communities.canada.com/ottawa...and-order.aspx
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2009, 3:16 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Follow-up

Do we not have any rights as neighbours?’
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Technol...754/story.html
Backyard wildlife garden sparks complaints of skunks, swarms of bugs

BY PATRICK DARE, THE OTTAWA CITIZENJULY 7, 2009 11:01 PMBE THE FIRST TO POST A COMMENT


OTTAWA-Some neighbours of a Constance Bay couple who are trying to build a wildlife garden in their backyard say the project has generated problems for them, attracting skunks and swarms of bugs.

Linda Januch said she called the city and complained as a last resort after trying to approach her neighbours, Vera and Henry Jones, about the negative effects of their garden project. The Joneses moved into a half-acre property a year ago and started planning a garden to replace the large lawns that had been there.

They call it the Allbirch Pollinator Garden, and it involves allowing grass and flowers to grow and only be cut once, in the spring. They have also planted a number of fruit trees. The goal is to create an environment that’s welcoming to butterflies and other insects that pollinate crops and flowers.

The City of Ottawa has stepped in and charged the couple under a property-maintenance bylaw that says residents must clear undergrowth, long grass or weeds.

Januch says skunks have made a home in some of the long grass at the Jones property. She says she is having trouble sleeping because of the strong smell of skunk. She says her children have been covered in mosquito bites this year and that family members can’t sit out and enjoy their deck and pool because of the volume of bugs coming from the long grass.

“They need to think of the people who live around them as well,” Januch said. “Do we not have any rights as neighbours?”

Randy Campeau, who lives with Januch, says he understands the desire to have a garden that is not just lawn and is more natural, but he says he’s concerned about the possibilities of their children and two dogs running into skunks. He also says he can’t use his hot tub because there are too many bugs.

Campeau and Januch say people who want a completely naturalized garden should move to the country, where there is seclusion and no one to be bothered next door.

Campeau is also concerned about the impact the Jones property could have on the value of his home. “It looks just awful,” Campeau said of the Jones property. “It’s just a mess.”

Vera Jones says she doesn’t believe they have skunks nesting in the tall grass of their garden, and she doesn’t accept that there are more mosquitoes at their place. Henry Jones says that a normal lawn is much more attractive to skunks because they are lured by the presence of grubs, and that insects are an important part of the natural ecosystem.

On Tuesday, a manager with the city’s bylaw department visited the property to take a closer look. The city’s case is based on a single formal complaint. Vera Jones said they had been given an assurance that the city would not be enforcing the original deadline for cutting down the grass, which was today.

Under the city’s bylaws, it can order property owners to cut long grass, weeds or heavy undergrowth by a certain day. If that’s not done, the city can have the work done and hand the property owners the bill.

Linda Anderson, manager of bylaw services, said the city had not yet decided what to do in this case. She said the intent of the bylaw was to ensure properties were maintained and attractive. She said that the bylaw reflected the wishes of most of the citizens of the city.

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2009, 4:36 AM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
This just keeps on getting better.

Good grief... the mosquito problem is in all likelihood due to the amount of rain we've had this year. Constance Bay is surrounded by forest and mosquitoes breed in the dampness of forests, amongst other places. You cannot seriously expect to live surrounded by forest next to a major water body and not have mosquitoes.
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2009, 12:06 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dado View Post
This just keeps on getting better.

Good grief... the mosquito problem is in all likelihood due to the amount of rain we've had this year. Constance Bay is surrounded by forest and mosquitoes breed in the dampness of forests, amongst other places. You cannot seriously expect to live surrounded by forest next to a major water body and not have mosquitoes.
There is nothing quite as irrational as home owners.

My recollection of Constance Bay is that there are some pretty thick woods and water and swampy areas on many sides of the community...hmm sounds like prime breeding ground for mosquitoes to me.

I gather that the neighbours who complained to the by-law officers won't be exchanging christmas cards with the natural garden folks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2009, 3:29 PM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
There was a comment on the Citizen article page to the effect that (1) the bylaw in question is actually 2005-207 (not 208) and (2) that the bylaw itself may be being misapplied. Here is the part that refers to yard standards, which I've trimmed down (bad pun) to include only references to vegetation:


http://www.ottawa.ca/residents/bylaw...ndards_en.html
PART II - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY STANDARDS
YARD
6.
(3) Heavy undergrowth shall be eliminated from the yard so as to be consistent with the surrounding environment.

(4) A yard shall be cultivated or protected by ground cover, which prevents the erosion of the soil.

(5) A tree or other plant, or limb or branch of it, that is dead, diseased, decayed or damaged shall be removed from the property or otherwise pruned to remove the dead, diseased, dying or dangerous portions of the tree or plant so as to prevent an unsafe condition or damage to any building.

(6) Lawns shall be kept trimmed and not be overgrown or in an unsightly condition out of character with the surrounding environment.

(7) Subsection (6) shall not apply to yards which have been landscaped or maintained with materials such as:
(a) trees, shrubs, ornamental grasses or flowers;
(b) decorative stonework, walkways or screening;
(c) any other horticultural or landscape architectural elements.

(8) All hedges, shrubs, trees or other plants shall be planted and maintained in a manner that does not,
(a) adversely affect the safety of the public;
(b) adversely affect the safety of vehicular or pedestrian traffic;
(c) constitute an obstruction of view for vehicular or pedestrian traffic, but this does not prevent the erection of a hedge in the location that is 1 m (3 ft 3 in) or less in height; or,
(d) wholly or partially conceal or interfere with the use of any hydrant or water valves.


It would seem that the 'infraction' is that of 6 (3) ("heavy undergrowth" etc.) but undergrowth usually refers to wooded areas. There's even an explicit exception in subsection (7) that would seem to apply far more than does subs. (3).
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2009, 4:39 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dado View Post
There was a comment on the Citizen article page to the effect that (1) the bylaw in question is actually 2005-207 (not 208) and (2) that the bylaw itself may be being misapplied. Here is the part that refers to yard standards, which I've trimmed down (bad pun) to include only references to vegetation:

(6) Lawns shall be kept trimmed and not be overgrown or in an unsightly condition out of character with the surrounding environment.
This section could be open to a lot of interpretation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2009, 5:17 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
Follow-up

Do we not have any rights as neighbours?’
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Technol...754/story.html
Backyard wildlife garden sparks complaints of skunks, swarms of bugs

...
Campeau and Januch say people who want a completely naturalized garden should move to the country, where there is seclusion and no one to be bothered next door.
...

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen
I always thought that Constance Bay pretty much WAS out in the country?! If you don't want birds, bees, skunks, mosquitoes, then move downtown. Oh wait, I think they're all downtown too. Hmm.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2009, 1:21 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,599
Farewell to the lawn

By Leonard Stern, The Ottawa Citizen, July 9, 2009

Social conformity just happens. We do things because they've always been done that way. How we live is shaped by a zillion unwritten rules and regulations. To ignore these inherited protocols is to run the risk of being labelled eccentric.

For Henry and Vera Jones, their refusal to conform amounts to downright anti-social behaviour, at least according to the strict codes of conduct in suburbia. The Joneses, as the Citizen reported this week, outed themselves as social radicals by publicly rejecting the ideal of a manicured lawn.

The couple have a big backyard in Constance Bay and some months ago decided to hell with watering, fertilizing, cutting and weeding. Henry is a former Fisheries and Oceans scientist who has some understanding of ecology, so he and Vera decided to create a natural green space in lieu of a lawn. They would let the grass grow, plant an assortment of butterfly-friendly plants and allow a mini-meadow to emerge.

The neighbours were not impressed. Someone complained to the city's bylaw officials, who then sent the Joneses a letter threatening to come down there and cut the grass if the couple didn't do it themselves. Unmowed lawns in Constance Bay will not be tolerated. The resistance must be put down. Order will be re-established.

The neighbours deny that this is about anyone's refusal to conform. They say the Jones garden is attracting too many insects and critters to the area and thus diminishing the ability of others to enjoy their own properties. Still, it's clear that the Joneses are in equal trouble for breaching a strict code of suburban etiquette. "It looks just awful," said one disapproving neighbour.

The central irony of suburbia is that we give the streets names like Meadow Grove and Orchard Drive while ensuring that all traces of meadows and orchards are erased. The appearance of an actual meadow is an act of rebellion.

More than a decade ago, the Canadian cultural critic Robert Fulford observed that the suburban lawn had become an instrument of public shaming and social control.

"[A] dandelion's appearance on a lawn indicates that Sloth has taken up residence in paradise and is about to spread evil in every direction," he wrote. Weeds demonstrate a "weakness of the soul," announcing to the world that "the owner of the house refuses to respect the neighbourhood's right to peace, order and good government."

They say that clothes express the man, but in fact it's the lawn that does. A large expanse of flat, weedless grass in front of your house conveys a bunch of social messages. It suggests discipline, an ability to tame the natural world. As Fulford says, lawns express an "imperialist personality."

The most interesting aspect of big green lawns, especially front lawns, is that they are unused pieces of property. Sure, the children might play on the grass while you wash the car in the driveway, but a lawn is generally a place devoid of activity. Lawns are not living space.

The Canadian-trained architect Rufina Wu has said that the lawn represents "an extreme devaluation of space." The artifice of suburban lawns requires a considerable investment of resources -- an investment in something that has mainly aesthetic value.

Lawns are examples of conspicuous consumption, and like other such symbols have status attached to them. The more wasteful your lifestyle, the more money you are seen to have.

Maintaining a large velvety front lawn is not as excessive as keeping a private jet or killing an elephant for its tusks, but it is a symbol of waste nonetheless.

Urban planners have begun to wonder whether the fetish for big green lawns is sustainable.

The lawn came about as an accessory to a particular style of living, namely, the detached single-family house. But single-family houses, and the sprawling suburbs they produced, where life revolves around the automobile, are becoming obsolete, owing to the scarcity and high cost of energy.

The need to build denser and more efficient communities could spell the end of the road for the big green lawn. The environmentalist impulse behind denser communities and smart living has already interfered with lawn culture, in the form of pesticide bans. Without chemicals, the effort required to maintain the equivalent of a putting green on your property becomes much harder.

For some homeowners, the cost of doing so, as measured in time and money, outweighs the benefit. Henry and Vera Jones seem to have arrived at that conclusion.

As we become more sensitive to how we live, it'll be interesting to see whether perfect lawns begin to acquire reverse status. The large manicured lawn could soon transform from a symbol of good taste and discipline into one of personal irresponsibility, a bit like owning a Hummer.

Right now the Joneses are being derided as non-conformist troublemakers. Someday, they might be hailed as trendsetters.

Leonard Stern is the Citizen's editorial pages editor.

E-mail: lstern@thecitizen.canwest.com

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Life/Fa...019/story.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2009, 1:22 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,599
Wildlife garden row could end up in court
Environmental-law group considering bid for injunction

By Kate Jaimet, The Ottawa Citizen, July 9, 2009


A Constance Bay man who ran afoul of a city bylaw over the long, meadow-like grass in his front yard says he may begin legal proceedings against the city as early as today.

Hank Jones says he is taking advice from the environmental-law organization Ecojustice and is seriously considering filing for a court injunction to prevent the city from mowing the long grass and wildflowers that make up the budding wildlife garden in his front yard.

Although the city does not appear to be imminently poised to mow down Jones' wildlife garden, and has sent a bylaw supervisor to work with him on a compromise, Jones said Wednesday that a bigger issue was at stake.

"I'm ready to go national. I understand all cities have bylaws like this, and it's because of aesthetics, and aesthetics are what somebody else wants you to do," he said.

He said bylaws that encouraged mowed, golf-course-style lawns and discouraged natural, meadow-like properties contributed to environmental problems and to the decline of beneficial insects, such as bees and butterflies.

"Since this is a pollinator garden -- and it enriches the population of pollinators, who are taking a hit across North America, jeopardizing food security -- this is not just an aesthetic issue," Jones said. "It looks like a pretty deep and far-reaching issue, and it needs to be fixed."

He added that he was prepared to fight the case under the guidance of Ecojustice, even if it takes years in court.

"I'm not a young man. I may not be around to see the end of it. This, if it ends properly, is my legacy."

Hank Jones and his wife, Vera, received a notice last week informing them they were in violation of city bylaw 2005-208, for failing to remove the heavy undergrowth, long grass, or weeds on their property. They were instructed to cut the grass by Wednesday or risk having the city do the work and send them the bill. The notice was sent out in response to a complaint by a neighbour, who said that the long grass harboured skunks and mosquitoes.

When the Joneses complained to their councillor, Eli El-Chantiry, he arranged to have a bylaw supervisor visit the property and work with the Joneses on a solution.

On Wednesday, El-Chantiry said a compromise had been found that would allow Hank and Vera Jones to grow wildflowers, fruit trees and long meadow grasses on their portion of the half-acre property as long as they mowed and maintained the part of the property adjacent to the road, which belongs to the city.

"We're willing to work with them to achieve what they want in terms of naturalization," said Susan Jones, the city's general manager of emergency and protective services and no relation to Hank and Vera Jones.

However, she added, the city could not guarantee in writing that it would never step in and mow the lawn.

"If they stop doing something (to maintain the property), we may have to go back. We can never give that guarantee that we wouldn't go in and do it," she said. "This is going to be a work in progress, given what they want to do."

Although he agreed to work with the city, having no written guarantee that his meadow would be protected left Hank Jones uneasy. Then on Wednesday, he received a call from Will Amos, a staff lawyer at the environmental-law clinic jointly run by Ecojustice and the University of Ottawa, who had heard about the situation in the news and proposed turning the matter into a legal fight.

"The Joneses recognize this isn't just about them," Amos said. "This is one reason Ecojustice sees them as perfect clients for us. ... It's about all municipalities in Canada who purport to have the authority to go and chop down peoples' lawns. The message needs to be heard loud and clear, and, if it takes an injunction against Canada's capital, so be it."

Amos said that, while he was still considering the legal options, one course of action would be to file an injunction against the city in Ontario Superior Court, followed by a claim seeking a legal review of the Joneses' notice of violation.

This legal review could be used to challenge both the specific notice against the Joneses and the overall validity of the bylaw. Amos said the bylaw could potentially be challenged on the basis that it was unconstitutional (violating freedom of expression), that it was too vague, and that it was outside of municipal jurisdiction.

However, Susan Jones, the manager responsible at the city, said she believed the bylaw would stand up to legal scrutiny. She said the city received about 1,700 complaints each summer from people whose neighbours had unkempt, weedy gardens that pull down property values, and those were the properties targeted by the bylaw.

"This is a bylaw that was developed in full consultation with the community, who developed the standards they wanted," she said. "I think we're on good grounds here."

Meanwhile, Hank Jones said he would keep up his end of the bargain with the city by mowing the grass adjacent to the road and planting attractive native shrubs on a steeply sloping part of the property leading from the road easement to the rest of the lawn.

He added that the concerns of his neighbours were important to him. A retired Fisheries and Oceans scientist, he said the wildlife garden was something of a scientific experiment.

"We would like to invite our neighbours to participate. If they have concerns with what we're doing, a critique would be good, or as we say in science, a peer review," he said. "These concerns will be taken, they will be investigated, and, if they require some kind of change, we will make the change."

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Wi...028/story.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:51 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.