Isn't it funny how the throw away statements end up being the news story?
I've a couple of questions based on this paragraph from Mr Bratina's response.
Quote:
Additional train service is coming to Hamilton, thanks in part to my unwaivering demand that passenger rail service be returned to James St. North. It was an underpinning of my original campaign and led to my assembling of the VIA Rail task force. No more trains can be accomodated at Hunter Street. However the increased GO service, including VIA trains, is explicitly outlined as an immediate (within 5 years) goal of the Metrolinx strategy.
|
I know some of these have been asked and answered elsewhere, but I'm curious incase things have changed with newer thoughts, etc.
When rail returns to James North, what are the chances that pressure will be brought to bear upon Liuna to allow the original station building to be reused, if only in part, as a railway station?
Which is to come to James North first, VIA or GO or doesn't it matter? They'll both happen at the same time?
When rail comes to James North again, what happens to rail at the Hunter Street station? Can Hamilton support two railway stations that are effectively performing the same task (GO transit to and from Toronto) or will the Hunter Street station be repurposed for some other transit use? Will they have slightly different tasks?
Why can't the Hunter Street station handle more train traffic? I am sure I read somewhere else in this forum about money having be put towards the tracks just outside of Hamilton that would allow passenger trains and freight trains to share the line more easily. Would this not help that station handle more traffic?
I personally think that any increase in rail access to and from Hamilton can only be a good thing.
On a totally personal note, I'm looking forward to riding a GO train for the silliest of reasons. We don't have double decker trains here.