HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2008, 8:20 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,721
[Locked] Burrard Street Bridge Cycling Improvements | Completed

Just noticed this site on the City's website showing the poster boards from the November 2007 open house:

http://vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/burrard/index.htm
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2008, 11:06 PM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
beat me dammit =P

Interesting about the section pier 1 & 6. I don't think they will ever open it. If they do, they need to really adress safety and security.
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2008, 11:32 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,721
Agreed. There already are staircases in there that aren't used in at least one pier. They would have to build a ribbon staircase around the outside of the tower base to make it safe.
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2008, 2:01 AM
clooless clooless is offline
Registered Luser
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 424
Perhaps I am seeing things, but I was sure that one of the suggested improvements was the installation of an elevator into one of the piers to facilitate pedestrian access to the bridge from False Creek.
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2008, 2:13 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,721
Yeah, that's what Deasine is referring to. Don't know how that could be made safe.
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2008, 4:33 AM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,700
City of Vancouver Burrard Bridge PDFs

Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Just noticed this site on the City's website showing the poster boards from the November 2007 open house:

http://vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/burrard/index.htm
















__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2008, 8:42 PM
nikw nikw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 50
i agree that the complete widening of the bridge is the most practical option, but looking at the renderings, I don't think that the look of the extended sidewalks at the piers goes at all esthetically with the rest of the bridge.

Last edited by nikw; Feb 3, 2008 at 12:17 AM.
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2008, 9:53 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,721
Thanks for posting the diagrams.

Actually, I think the design looks OK. I did notice that the existing concrete balustrade is deteriorating quite a bit (though that could be in anticipation of this project).
The only thing that's a bit odd to me is the supports for the cantilevered sidewalk at the Main Towers are from above, rather than from below. From the bridge deck, having the supports below the walkway would look better.

I still think that the best solution would be to take one lane and reallocate it as outside bike lanes and shuffle the existing lanes - esp. given the cost of this project.
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2008, 5:36 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
David
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,453
yeah, I really wish they had just shut down a lane of car traffic.
I don't understand the problem either. Do Granville or Burrard Bridges EVER have traffic problems!?
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2008, 6:06 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,083
yeah it bottlenecks at either end
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2008, 6:32 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,721
But not significantly - i.e. maybe a 10 minute wait.
The reduction of Cambie Brdige to one lane each way during Canada Line construction hasn't seriously overloaded Main St. or Granville Bridge or Burrard Bridge - traffic spreads around - the same would happen if just one lane of Burrard is removed.
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2008, 6:28 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,721
Hmmm, no surprise here.....

Quote:
Cost of attaching bike lanes to Burrard Street Bridge has increased

Tuesday, April 29 - 09:25:00 AM
Shane Bigham

VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) - The cost of attaching bike lanes to the side of the Burrard Street Bridge has jumped from $14 to $57 million, which is a four-fold increase over the initial estimate.

The city had hoped to avoid traffic congestion on the bridge during construction by building along the side of the bridge.

Rising construction costs and changes to the initial plan are blamed for the increase.
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 12:58 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
It's still a proposal/study isn't it?
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 1:44 AM
MistyMountainHop's Avatar
MistyMountainHop MistyMountainHop is offline
I worship Led Zeppelin
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,233
Why don't they just get rid of a lane like they'd originally planned?
__________________
Bill: Be excellent to each other.
Ted: Party on, dudes.
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 2:00 AM
Stingray2004's Avatar
Stingray2004 Stingray2004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: White Rock, BC (Metro Vancouver)
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
The cost of attaching bike lanes to the side of the Burrard Street Bridge has jumped from $14 to $57 million, which is a four-fold increase over the initial estimate.
Woahh... $57 million just ain't financialy feasible or viable.

Perhaps something more simpler, bikes on one sidewalk and pedestrians on the other and perhaps some simple metal barrier adjacent to the sidewalk providing a better sense of security.
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 2:35 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmorek View Post
Why don't they just get rid of a lane like they'd originally planned?
I don't agree with taking out one lane - Burrard street is pretty busy for most of the day.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stingray2004 View Post
Woahh... $57 million just ain't financialy feasible or viable.

Perhaps something more simpler, bikes on one sidewalk and pedestrians on the other and perhaps some simple metal barrier adjacent to the sidewalk providing a better sense of security.
The sidewalks aren't very wide and it feels pretty dangerous biking on Burrard street bridge despite it being segregated from traffic. I did it a few times and even though i'm an experienced biker [or more experienced than others I should say], I'm still scared of fallling to the side or hitting pedestrians. Even if you seperated pedestrians and bikers, you would still have that problem since the sidewalks aren't wide enough.
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 2:56 AM
nathan6969 nathan6969 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 216
For $57 milllion we might as well buy a car for every single person that bikes across the burrard bridge...and as for taking out a lane, this thing was built 80 years ago, now vancouver is 10 times the size and we wanna make it smaller.
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 3:20 AM
worldwide's Avatar
worldwide worldwide is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver - Ktown
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan6969 View Post
For $57 milllion we might as well buy a car for every single person that bikes across the burrard bridge...and as for taking out a lane, this thing was built 80 years ago, now vancouver is 10 times the size and we wanna make it smaller.
funny thing about this is that most of these cyclists probably own a car, or would if they wanted to, but they bike anyways, for obvious reasons.

also theres a lot of bike traffic into downtown. if we bought them all cars we may actually need a new traffic lane or 2
__________________
Hieroglyphics yeah, to the kick and the snare like that, there, yeah, we keep it raw rare
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 3:21 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan6969 View Post
For $57 milllion we might as well buy a car for every single person that bikes across the burrard bridge...and as for taking out a lane, this thing was built 80 years ago, now vancouver is 10 times the size and we wanna make it smaller.
AHHHHHHHH! *SMACK*

We are trying to make our city have less cars, NOT MORE. We want to make our city more bike and pedestrian friendly, not necessarily car friendly. If we chose to purchase cars for everyone, might as well tear up a few neighborhoods for freeways.

$57 million is a lot of money I agree, but it's a long investment, and a good one. I would prefer to see another pedestrian/bike only bridge however.
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 3:30 AM
worldwide's Avatar
worldwide worldwide is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver - Ktown
Posts: 704
yeah, from english bay to vanier park... they need to build this
__________________
Hieroglyphics yeah, to the kick and the snare like that, there, yeah, we keep it raw rare
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:07 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.