HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Politics


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 4:24 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
??? Sim gets sidetracked constantly.

He said all the right things during the campaign, but has hardly delivered on any of them.
And promises more money for community centres, but is it more? And then gets blasted by the entire group of community association boards.

Quote:
Jerry Fast, the chair of the Association President’s Group, which represents 19 community centre associations across Vancouver, said he was very concerned with how the five centres in the capital plan were chosen.

“We’re not following the major study that was done to resolve this issue about prioritizing renewal,” he said. “Instead we have a list that seems to come out of nowhere.”
https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article...s-critical-of-mayors-rec-centre-renewal/

Can't even deliver a good news story for positive press!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 4:46 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
??? Sim gets sidetracked constantly.

He said all the right things during the campaign, but has hardly delivered on any of them.
In what way? You don't have to agree with the policy, but pretty much everything that is voted on that Sim and ABC want passed gets passed without a trillion amendments and endless debate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 4:55 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
In what way? You don't have to agree with the policy, but pretty much everything that is voted on that Sim and ABC want passed gets passed without a trillion amendments and endless debate.
What happened to the Park Board stuff?

Community centres and pools continue to degrade.

Council voted against the west end hotel proposal? Why? NIMBY?

He's obsessed with bitcoin. He refuses to touch the massive VPD budget. They dropped the ball on the stanley park train and now it's gone for good. He's wasting money on fireworks.

The latest is this MLB garbage. Totally out of left field, pun intended.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 5:17 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
What happened to the Park Board stuff?
Vancouver cannot unilaterally do it. Mayor and council requested this from the province and the province said to hold a referendum. No getting side tracked there.

Quote:
Community centres and pools continue to degrade.
What about this shows a city council that can't get their agenda done?

Quote:
Council voted against the west end hotel proposal? Why? NIMBY?
Seems like. Just a policy you and I disagree with, though.

Quote:
He's obsessed with bitcoin. He refuses to touch the massive VPD budget. They dropped the ball on the stanley park train and now it's gone for good. He's wasting money on fireworks.
These just sound like policies you disagree with. VPD budget is untouchable according to the province so it's not like that's changing under any other mayor and council. I'm pretty happy to see fireworks funding. In a wishy-washier council if an event like the Celebration of Light was in jeopardy we'd probably see zero support.

Quote:
The latest is this MLB garbage. Totally out of left field, pun intended.
This is just a policy you disagree with, and that's fine.

Last edited by chowhou; Apr 24, 2026 at 5:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 5:17 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
In what way? You don't have to agree with the policy, but pretty much everything that is voted on that Sim and ABC want passed gets passed without a trillion amendments and endless debate.
I suspect the content of any policy is viewed by most people as much more important than it being passed without 'a trillion amendments or endless debate'.

But if ABC is more efficient at moving their policy through Council, it's in part because they illegally meet (virtually and as a caucus) and agree decisions ahead of time. That's been noted by the ethics commissioner in two reports that the mayor and ABC continue to ignore. Caucusing is legal in Federal and Provincial politics but it isn't allowed at the municipal level.

Unfortunately, there's not much that can be done about ABC's continued breach of the rules, as they're supposed to self police them. B.C. ombudsperson has recently said B.C.’s system is too weak. And ABC's initial response to the findings were to try to shut down the office of the integrity commissioner.

Internally within ABC there have been several minor earthquakes. They've thrown one councillor out of caucus, and they no longer control either the Park Board or the School Board as commissioners on both bodies have abandoned ABC for other parties, or to become independent. The two bi-elections show how popular the party had become last year. It'll be interesting to see how the next election plays out. It would be ironic for Sim to win, but the majority of Council being from more progressive parties. Maybe he'll start issuing Executive Orders, signed in sharpie.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/

Last edited by Changing City; Apr 24, 2026 at 6:10 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 5:21 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
But if ABC is more efficient at moving their policy through Council, it's in part because they illegally meet (virtually and as a caucus) and agree decisions ahead of time. That's been noted by the ethics commissioner in two reports that the mayor and ABC continue to ignore. Caucusing is legal in Federal and Provincial politics but it isn't allowed at the municipal level.

Unfortunately, there's not much that can be done about ABC's continued breach of the rules, as they're supposed to self police them. B.C. ombudsperson has recently said B.C.’s system is too weak. And ABC's initial response to the findings were to try to shut down the office of the integrity commissioner.
This is still a very odd policy to me and while it is indeed explicitly not allowed on paper, it's not something I care about deeply since the rule itself is a bad rule as far as I'm concerned. I would expect and encourage COPE and OneCity and the Greens and TEAM to do the same.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 5:55 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
In what way? You don't have to agree with the policy, but pretty much everything that is voted on that Sim and ABC want passed gets passed without a trillion amendments and endless debate.
Debate and compromise in government is not a "bad" thing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 9:24 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
This is just a policy you disagree with, and that's fine.
No we're talking about random things that pop into Sim's head.

I'd be happy if he did what he said he would when he was running for Mayor. He hasn't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2026, 12:11 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,059
He also backtracked on the Park Board and some of the bike lanes during the election... only to put them front and centre again once he won. I'm not particularly fond of either, but that's fairly deceptive.

Most of the 200 new cops and nurses haven't shown up, the reduced permit approval time hasn't been reduced, the "waste" in the budget hasn't been found, and now "zero means zero" is forcing service cuts left and right. It's a different brand of inaction from the Stewart council, but produces the exact same kind of nothing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted May 1, 2026, 10:14 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,677
It's all just gambling at the end of the day but I find it fun to watch the Polymarket prediction for the municipal election.

https://polymarket.com/event/vancouver-mayoral-election-winner

Currently Ken Sim is neck and neck with Kareem Allam (according to degenerate gamblers).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted May 4, 2026, 6:53 PM
kikin kikin is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2025
Posts: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
It's all just gambling at the end of the day but I find it fun to watch the Polymarket prediction for the municipal election.

https://polymarket.com/event/vancouver-mayoral-election-winner

Currently Ken Sim is neck and neck with Kareem Allam (according to degenerate gamblers).
how accurate is Polymarket for elections in the past?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted May 5, 2026, 10:57 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by kikin View Post
how accurate is Polymarket for elections in the past?
Supposedly on the whole only around 90% accurate 1 month before an event and given we're 5 months out I wouldn't put too much faith in the odds here. It's just interesting to watch.

You can look at the last two months before the last provincial election here, and it was pretty uncertain until the weeks leading up to the election.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted May 11, 2026, 9:29 PM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,515
Quote:
Vancouver Greens Nominate City Council Candidates for 2026 Election
May 11, 2026
Annette Reilly, Bridget Burns, Camil Dumont, and Stephanie Smith to join Pete Fry’s team for City Hall

VANCOUVER, B.C., MAY 11, 2026 — Members of the Green Party of Vancouver have selected Annette Reilly, Bridget Burns, Camil Dumont, and Stephanie Smith as the party’s nominated candidates for Vancouver City Council in the 2026 municipal election.

The four candidates will join Councillor Pete Fry, who is running for Mayor, as part of his Green team focused on affordability, climate action, accountable governance, and putting people back at the centre of City Hall.
https://www.vangreens.ca/vancouver_greens_nominate_city_council_candidates_for_2026_election

This leaves the Greens with one empty space to run a candidate for council per their tri-party agreement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted May 12, 2026, 1:13 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,515
Quote:
Nominees for council, joining Lucy Maloney:

Iona Bonamis
Frances Bula
Jarrett Hagglund
Caitlin Stockwell
https://morehousing.substack.com/p/nomination-results

One City elected their nominees yesterday.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted May 12, 2026, 3:58 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
https://morehousing.substack.com/p/nomination-results

One City elected their nominees yesterday.
And as a result of OneCity's self cuckoldry we lose out on Russil Wvong and Peter Waldkirch. What a damn shame. Interesting to note that Frances Bula, Iona Bonamis, and Jarrett Hagglund had formed a coalition together with Mike Tan but he lost out to Caitlin Stockwell who most certainly will not be getting my vote.

Sounds like tonight COPE will be announcing Stephanie Allen as their mayoral candidate. What happened to COPE, OneCity, and the Greens agreeing on a mayoral candidate? This might be the most "serious" mayoral candidates we've ever seen on the ballot. I guess no one can say that they're politically homeless this election.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted May 12, 2026, 4:16 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
And as a result of OneCity's self cuckoldry we lose out on Russil Wvong and Peter Waldkirch. What a damn shame. Interesting to note that Frances Bula, Iona Bonamis, and Jarrett Hagglund had formed a coalition together with Mike Tan but he lost out to Caitlin Stockwell who most certainly will not be getting my vote.

Sounds like tonight COPE will be announcing Stephanie Allen as their mayoral candidate. What happened to COPE, OneCity, and the Greens agreeing on a mayoral candidate? This might be the most "serious" mayoral candidates we've ever seen on the ballot. I guess no one can say that they're politically homeless this election.
It pretty much guarantees Sim’s reelection.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted May 12, 2026, 4:35 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
It pretty much guarantees Sim’s reelection.
I think we're still possibly waiting for the "Conservative Electors" candidate as well which might strip some votes away from Sim.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted May 12, 2026, 3:24 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
It pretty much guarantees Sim’s reelection.
You think so? I can see a situation with Sim as mayor but a mostly left-wing council.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted May 12, 2026, 7:28 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
You think so? I can see a situation with Sim as mayor but a mostly left-wing council.
Yes, I agree. I meant it guaranteed his own re-election not necessarily all his councillors. The demise of local media means voters really don't know much about the issues unless they really seek out info.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted May 13, 2026, 2:04 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
And as a result of OneCity's self cuckoldry we lose out on Russil Wvong and Peter Waldkirch. What a damn shame. Interesting to note that Frances Bula, Iona Bonamis, and Jarrett Hagglund had formed a coalition together with Mike Tan but he lost out to Caitlin Stockwell who most certainly will not be getting my vote.
No word on the Russil Wvong's placement, but Peter Waldkirch finished fifth, meaning he was the last to be eliminated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Politics
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:21 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.