HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario


View Poll Results: Which route should be twinned? Quelle route doit-on élargir?
11 8 20.00%
17 32 80.00%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2017, 1:15 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco101 View Post
I've heard the drugs and alcohol argument for the far North reserves that aren't accessible by a permanent road. I've even heard some in Moosonee (yes it's a town but 85% Indigenous) talk about it even though the train has gone there for 80 years. But I'd say the vast majority of people in any of those places want to have a road built.

Now widening a highway through a reserve is a totally different issue. First Nations know that they can negotiate so they do it. They sometimes play hardball and aren't in a hurry because they know that it will likely mean they will get more.
Sometimes, if the government feels that they’re asking for too much, though, it just decides to bypass the FN’s too, forcing a deal. An example is AB government twinning their HWY 43. (It’s a hearsay for me though.)

What that means for twinning 17 in case of a stalled negotiation, then, is this:
In Blind River, we demolish and relocate every single property north of Causeley Street to make way for another 2 lanes, shoulders and interchanges.
(I “left out” SSM because I have talked about it in earlier posts.)
In Serpent River, we realign the freeway to the north of the FN, from west of it to Webwood.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2017, 4:12 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco101 View Post
I've heard the drugs and alcohol argument for the far North reserves that aren't accessible by a permanent road. I've even heard some in Moosonee (yes it's a town but 85% Indigenous) talk about it even though the train has gone there for 80 years. But I'd say the vast majority of people in any of those places want to have a road built.

Now widening a highway through a reserve is a totally different issue. First Nations know that they can negotiate so they do it. They sometimes play hardball and aren't in a hurry because they know that it will likely mean they will get more.
Highway 69 is a great example of this mess. The current undivided sections run through a few FN reserves.

If the province really wanted to play hard ball, they could simply skirt their lands, an the old highway gets downloaded.

Then they get nothing but more headaches.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2017, 6:27 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
Highway 69 is a great example of this mess. The current undivided sections run through a few FN reserves.

If the province really wanted to play hard ball, they could simply skirt their lands, an the old highway gets downloaded.

Then they get nothing but more headaches.
It will be a lose-lose though, since MTO will have to do it at great cost. Imagine the extra amount of rock that needs blasting and/or the amount of property expropriation that needs to happen.

AB doesn’t have the kind of terrain that we have so bypassing FN can be easily done.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2017, 2:23 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
It will be a lose-lose though, since MTO will have to do it at great cost. Imagine the extra amount of rock that needs blasting and/or the amount of property expropriation that needs to happen.

AB doesn’t have the kind of terrain that we have so bypassing FN can be easily done.
Expropriation? Most of the surrounding land is crown land.

The additional amount of blasting would be not be that much in comparison to the costs of paying the FN.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2017, 3:43 AM
Loco101's Avatar
Loco101 Loco101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Timmins, Northern Ontario
Posts: 7,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
Highway 69 is a great example of this mess. The current undivided sections run through a few FN reserves.

If the province really wanted to play hard ball, they could simply skirt their lands, an the old highway gets downloaded.

Then they get nothing but more headaches.
The province can go around reserves but it's not often easier and less costly. With a reserve it is only dealing with the First Nation government which can (but not always) be easier than dealing with a bunch of private property owners.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2017, 3:51 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco101 View Post
The province can go around reserves but it's not often easier and less costly. With a reserve it is only dealing with the First Nation government which can (but not always) be easier than dealing with a bunch of private property owners.
As I said before, the land surrounding the reserves along highway 69 is mainly Crown Land.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2017, 5:09 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
Expropriation? Most of the surrounding land is crown land.

The additional amount of blasting would be not be that much in comparison to the costs of paying the FN.
I'm having 17 near SSM in mind.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2017, 5:32 AM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco101 View Post
The province can go around reserves but it's not often easier and less costly. With a reserve it is only dealing with the First Nation government which can (but not always) be easier than dealing with a bunch of private property owners.
Well, Garden River reserve held out for 30 years before they decided to allow the stretch from the Black Road (eventually) to Echo Bay to be built. This was in spite of the safety issues of having a transcontinental highway routed down their Main Street, with their kids riding their bikes on the shoulders alongside transport trucks. In that case, going around the reserve wasn’t feasible, however.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2017, 5:43 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6 View Post
Well, Garden River reserve held out for 30 years before they decided to allow the stretch from the Black Road (eventually) to Echo Bay to be built. This was in spite of the safety issues of having a transcontinental highway routed down their Main Street, with their kids riding their bikes on the shoulders alongside transport trucks. In that case, going around the reserve wasn’t feasible, however.
In hindsight, MTO should have threatened to route the 4-lane segment along 108 (starting east of Serpent River FN), across to 129, then west onto 101 and finally along 17 west of Wawa.

Alternatively, a very expensive option could also have been considered: 4-lane freeway hovering over Saint Mary's River.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2017, 5:50 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
By the way, I just realized that there’s no reasonable alternative route to the 17 between 631 (White River) and 101 (Wawa).
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2017, 6:26 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
By the way, I just realized that there’s no reasonable alternative route to the 17 between 631 (White River) and 101 (Wawa).
This is the case in much of Northern Ontario. This is why I am not a fan of simply adding 2 lanes beside it.

The MTO should leave 11 and 17 alone, and keep them as 2 lane highways. They should build new 4 lanes near them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2017, 4:36 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
deleted
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.

Last edited by Dengler Avenue; Jan 4, 2018 at 9:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2018, 9:06 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
I don't know if I've asked this before, but is it at least remotely feasible for the provincial government to negotiate a deal with the federal government to get the army (at Petawawa) to twin 17 between North Bay and Arnprior, with the latter footing most of the bill? ("Military training" they call it.)

I'm asking for a lot, am I not?
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2018, 10:32 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
I don't know if I've asked this before, but is it at least remotely feasible for the provincial government to negotiate a deal with the federal government to get the army (at Petawawa) to twin 17 between North Bay and Arnprior, with the latter footing most of the bill? ("Military training" they call it.)

I'm asking for a lot, am I not?
I don't think this has been asked.

The military does not actively build roads, much less major highways. I doubt they have the skill set for this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2018, 10:57 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
I don't think this has been asked.

The military does not actively build roads, much less major highways. I doubt they have the skill set for this.
Don't they need to know how to build roads and bridges under hours if not minutes, in the context of a war... I thought I could have expected more...
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2018, 10:59 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Don't they need to know how to build roads and bridges under hours if not minutes, in the context of a war... I thought I could have expected more...
Those roads and bridges are designed to be used by large trucks going slow, but still moving. Not for high speed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2018, 5:01 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Rip. I talked to 2 friends from Toronto about this, and they were deadly opposed to it, “Not that many people take it/drive trucks anyway, so why waste money trying to upgrade it?”
See what opposition we face to twin even the bottlenecks.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2018, 8:33 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Rip. I talked to 2 friends from Toronto about this, and they were deadly opposed to it, “Not that many people take it/drive trucks anyway, so why waste money trying to upgrade it?”
See what opposition we face to twin even the bottlenecks.
Was there much doubt?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2018, 9:20 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
Was there much doubt?
It just doesn’t help that the provincial capital of Ontario is not on the main TCH route, unlike every other province (except NS). Forget it. Let’s talk about under what circumstance a referendum will be triggered to split the province into 3. My proposal of the split was written in the other thread.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2018, 9:25 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
It just doesn’t help that the provincial capital of Ontario is not on the main TCH route, unlike every other province (except NS). Forget it. Let’s talk about under what circumstance a referendum will be triggered to split the province into 3. My proposal of the split was written in the other thread.
I doubt the south would ever let us go. Our resources are funding their services.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:49 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.