HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1741  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2015, 11:49 PM
Migs Migs is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Regina, Sk, Canada
Posts: 3,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry View Post
Riders announced a profit of 2.2 million last season. That shows you how tight the profit margins are. 42M operating budget. Makes me wonder how much the Cats/Argos are losing per season
Don't forget the Riders are allocating millions out of that revenue towards the new stadium.
     
     
  #1742  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 1:44 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Something seems off when it comes to CFL team balance sheets. The cap is a hair over $5M... where does the rest of that money go? I know the other teams have lower revenue lines than the Riders, but still, even if you bring in half of what the Riders do, $5M still seems oddly low for a football team roster.
I think there's a lot of other expenses people don't think about when they consider the cap.

Coaching and football staff are not covered by it, neither is scouting (and most teams seem to invest more heavily in all of that these days). They each run off-season free agent camps, usually several. Equipment must be a large cost, and most teams maintain training facilities now. Travel costs must be a large amount (transportation, food, accommodation).

The business side has a lot of expenses. Promotion and advertising. Maintaining a staff of ticket reps and business account managers. Concession purchases and management/prep/sales. I don't know what profit margins are on merchandise, but teams have to buy the inventory (which must be huge for the Riders in particular). There are office-related costs and overhead. Some have stadium rental costs. Teams also put money into community programs.

That's just off the top of my head but I imagine a more complete accounting could be put together from the annual reports of the publicly owned teams.
     
     
  #1743  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 12:10 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denscity View Post
Ya I was gonna say I can't even speak French but it is one of Canada's official languages. Thought it was a bit disrespectful.
Water on the back of a duck!
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #1744  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 12:41 PM
osmo osmo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy_haak View Post
You're trying to tell us that there's a greater difference between these two photos than some news seats and a fresh coat of paint? /s
The Lansdowne reno is offensive architecturally/design wise.

Canadian folks with our low standards for stadia take it, since it is "better then nothing", but the no frills approach to the old stands will make the facility age poorly.

Why could they not integrate the wood feature into the old stands? Why wasn't the seat alignment modified to match the new stands? Price of course, but it made a bush league situation where you have a isolated world class section on one end, and a completely foreign structure on the other. It maybe would of been to tall of a task to rebuild both ends, that is a steep price, but at least do things to bridge and marry both sides together more seamlessly. More could of been done.
     
     
  #1745  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 4:15 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by osmo View Post
The Lansdowne reno is offensive architecturally/design wise.

Canadian folks with our low standards for stadia take it, since it is "better then nothing", but the no frills approach to the old stands will make the facility age poorly.

Why could they not integrate the wood feature into the old stands? Why wasn't the seat alignment modified to match the new stands? Price of course, but it made a bush league situation where you have a isolated world class section on one end, and a completely foreign structure on the other. It maybe would of been to tall of a task to rebuild both ends, that is a steep price, but at least do things to bridge and marry both sides together more seamlessly. More could of been done.
Bullshit, nice try with the Canadians are backwards shot, again bullshit, considering an American did the design. Some people are always ready to troll out the old "bush league" or "US high school" crap without a clue of the history.

Here's a history lesson for ya and while I'm at it, a grammar lesson..."could have been"

Early stadium design wins kudos from panel
Don Butler The Ottawa Citizen May 1, 2010

If Rob Claiborne has his way, a sculpted “stadium in the park” will replace the rotting hulk of Frank Clair stadium by 2013.



Claiborne is the architect chosen to design the stadium as part of the redevelopment of Lansdowne Park. He works for Cannon Design, the firm behind the much-admired Olympic Oval in Richmond, B.C.

His conceptual design for the new Frank Clair stadium has already won kudos from experts on the review panel overseeing the design of the Lansdowne Park plan.

George Dark, the renowned urban designer who chairs the panel, calls Claiborne’s design “quite cool. There’s quite an imaginative stadium being cooked up here.”

Another panel member, Rick Haldenby, the head of the University of Waterloo’s architecture school, is even more effusive.

If Claiborne’s design is accepted by city council on June 23, Haldenby says, “it’s going to be an instant architectural feature in Canada — the most interesting stadium in Canada by far.”

Claiborne knows he’s got something special. He describes his design, which he’s been working on since December, as a “gift to the city of Ottawa. I’m just thrilled, because people seem to be enjoying it.”

Its most striking feature is a sinuous $7.5-million “veil” of glued laminated Alaskan yellow cedar that rises up from behind new southside stands and curls over the top, creating a flowing system of enclosure and roofing.



Claiborne uses the same veil motif at the entrances to the northside stands. It recurs as well behind the end zone scoreboard, creating a bandstand that could be used during outdoor concerts in Lansdowne Park’s proposed “front lawn” urban park.

“I always saw this project being done in wood,” Claiborne says, proudly showing off his plans in Cannon Design’s 12th floor offices overlooking University Avenue in Toronto.

In part it’s a reference to Ottawa’s lumber-town past, but it also fits Claiborne’s daring concept of a stadium in the park. To do that, he says, “you have to be much more natural.”

Claiborne chose Alaskan yellow cedar for the veil because it withstands the weather well.



“It will turn a beautiful silvery colour over time, but in all our conversations with the manufacturers, they’re quite comfortable that this will maintain its structural integrity.”

In Claiborne’s design, the southside stands seem to emerge organically from a steep grassy berm that rises seven metres from the Queen Elizabeth Driveway. “You can actually see the park bending up, merging into the stadium,” the architect says.

It’s all part of his concept of “laminar space, a space that literally flows. The parklands become sculpted, undulating, flowing. That became really important to me.”

The wooden frames of the veil are part of that idea of flow, he says. At the concourse level of the southside stands, the public can walk or ride bicycles right through the veil, even on game days.

“Typically a stadium’s going to have a very clear border, a buffer,” Claiborne says. “There’s a public side, and there’s a stadium side. Not the case here. It’s not just lip service about being in the park. It is in the park.”

Lansdowne Park, he says, has never really been a park. “It was a fairgrounds, it was a carnival site, it was a series of venues, but it was never actually parkland. Now, for the first time, it’s a park.”

To improve spectator sightlines and enhance the stadium’s bowl appearance, Claiborne proposes to lower the current playing field by about one metre. “That one’s still a cost issue,” he cautions, “because it’s expensive to lower the field.”

On a pragmatic level, lowering the field makes it easier to widen it to 75 yards, the standard for FIFA soccer games. The current field is only 70 yards wide.

Under Claiborne’s plan, the remaining southside stands — Dark describes them as a “hideous lump” — would be demolished and replaced by new stands. The existing northside stands would stay, but get a retrofit.

New wider seats would be installed and the heavy metal roof would be replaced by the same translucent fabric used on the southside roof.

Claiborne is considering two possible suppliers for the roof fabric. His preferred choice is a German-Italian company called Vector Foiltec, which made the clear exterior panels for the Beijing Olympics’ aquatic centre, dubbed the Water Cube.

The stadium would have seating for 24,000 — 13,000 in the northside stands and 11,000 in the southside. It would offer three levels of seating — general, club seats and seats in 28 box suites.

For events such as the Grey Cup, temporary end zone seats could be installed, raising the stadium’s capacity to 45,000. Otherwise, the end zones would be grassy berms where people could sit or enjoy a picnic.

Claiborne’s plan calls for a two-storey retail component that would provide improved entrances to the arena and enclose the mammoth steel frames on the north facade of the Civic Centre.

Those sloping steel frames disrupt the view of the Aberdeen Pavilion, with its soft curves, Claiborne explains. “The second you put a vertical face here, it calms the entire vista.”

While the arena, home to the Ottawa 67’s, needs considerable work to address a long list of mechanical, electrical and structural problems, its design would remain essentially unchanged.

“If we turn it into a first-class arena,” Claiborne says, “the ticket prices have to go up considerably. The Ottawa 67’s are a very successful club, but they would be less successful if they had to double their ticket price.”

So far, Claiborne says cost estimates for the project are on target. “We have a budget of $85 million, not a penny more, for the stadium,” he says. “We’re right where we should be.” (The price tag rises to $110 million when “soft costs” such as professional fees are included.)

Dark says Claiborne’s thinking is “quite magical. He’s a smart guy.” Based on the design work he’s seen, Dark says the new stadium has the potential to rival the Richmond Oval as an iconic Canadian sporting venue.

Claiborne isn’t entirely at ease with the word icon, though. “An icon carries so much gravity with it. I would be more comfortable if this was a building people looked at and just had a comfortable, warm feeling about. If it was close to being universally liked, that would make me happy.”

Before joining Cannon Design about a year ago, Claiborne, a California native, worked for years for acclaimed architect Daniel Libeskind. He’s also an adjunct professor at McGill University’s school of architecture.

He’s acutely aware of the controversy surrounding the Lansdowne project.

He has relatives in Old Ottawa South — the area, along with the Glebe, where opposition to the redevelopment is concentrated — “and they hate me. They think I’m the devil because I’m working on Lansdowne Park.”

But Claiborne is hoping opposition will abate once people see his design. “Good architecture can be a great appeasement for everybody. People can actually enjoy it. And that’s the goal.

“It’s a building for the people. I’ve never lost sight of that for a second.”

For now, Claiborne’s stadium is just a concept on paper. But he’s optimistic that by 2013, it will be home to a new Ottawa CFL team.

“I go home every weekend and I’m having a glass of wine with my wife and I say, ‘Carolyn, you’re not going to believe this. This might actually get built’.”
     
     
  #1746  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 5:18 PM
Richard Lipschitz Richard Lipschitz is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by osmo View Post
The Lansdowne reno is offensive architecturally/design wise.
100% correct. You will take flack for that post, but you are bang on.
     
     
  #1747  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 5:47 PM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
Bullshit, nice try with the Canadians are backwards shot, again bullshit, considering an American did the design. Some people are always ready to troll out the old "bush league" or "US high school" crap without a clue of the history.

Here's a history lesson for ya and while I'm at it, a grammar lesson..."could have been"
...

Quote:
If Claiborne’s design is accepted by city council on June 23, Haldenby says, “it’s going to be an instant architectural feature in Canada — the most interesting stadium in Canada by far.”
While I don't mind the total stadium the way it is now - I think it's decent enough, and the best thing is the location... but it's just people's opinions. I've heard many not liking the look of it, but it doesn't make them right or wrong... and using a quote from someone who likes it doesn't negate the opinions of people who hate it. Nevermind that the quoted opinion was from 2010 and based only the plan and not the final outcome - as the shovels haven't even hit the ground at that point.

Also, the article is focused on the creation of the new south stands - which is not what people have problems with... it's the old north stands that's the issue. It was retrofitted but generally looks the same as before - and vastly differs from the south side.

Like I said, I think it's fine - but I can see other people's problem with the stadium - or at least half of it.
     
     
  #1748  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 6:27 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berklon View Post
.Like I said, I think it's fine - but I can see other people's problem with the stadium - or at least half of it.
My issue is people saying they did nothing to the north side and also acting like no thought was put into the integration of the north and south sides which is patently false. And you better than anybody know my reaction to when somebody makes the excuse because we are Canadian we can't do something
     
     
  #1749  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 6:28 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Lipschitz View Post
100% correct. You will take flack for that post, but you are bang on.
So says the guy who said they just added some seats to the north side.
     
     
  #1750  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 6:37 PM
osmo osmo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,717
A wall of text and the old stands of Lansdowne are still ugly... what is your point aside from some how my opinion having less value because I am not a grammar snob? Or appeasement because some American designed it? I could care less if a German, Canadian, or Swede did that plan, the result is ugly.

I never once bashed the NEW stands, they look great, but its the passing off the OLD stands which is what is offensive. It does not fit with the new stands in any sort of way. The awards never were given to the full scope of the project on both sides (why were they not pictured?), why? because no designer worth two pennies would promote such a plan unless forced too. Detail and effort was made for the new South stands, and the North was a afterthought and it is obvious to see it now.

Typical of new type designers, I can suspect he was turned off by the handcuffs of reforming the North side. Having to take into account the arena and other structure components limits creativity, so instead of uniform plan we simply just got half a beautiful stadium with the other half left the same. That's what Lansdowne is, its half a world style venue, and half a 1970s commie block stadium. Its a mess.

If both stands were like the South then yes it would be one of the best mid-sized venues easily on the globe. I think many felt that people would get so impressed by the new stands they would forget about the old ones. Any Ottawa local I talk too just scratches their head and says "Why didn't they remake the other stands too? Just should of blown the whole thing up and made it all look the same" It is like wearing one Italian loafer with one chuck Taylor shoe on the other foot, it makes no sense, and does not mesh.

The overhead shots are proof enough. Why would the designer curve the seating to look so strange and out of place to the old North stands? Why about the height and elevation difference? The use of glass heavy on the North side while not on the South?

It is plain as day the two sides were two different projects with small cross collaboration.
     
     
  #1751  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 7:12 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by osmo View Post
The awards never were given to the full scope of the project on both sides (why were they not pictured?), why? because no designer worth two pennies would promote such a plan unless forced too.
Uhh no, it was because I posted those few available drawings years ago to give people an idea of the what the article was saying.

Quote:
Originally Posted by osmo View Post
It is plain as day the two sides were two different projects with small cross collaboration.
Maybe plain in your uniformed opinion but the designer thought otherwise. Hmm, who do I believe understands this project, the guy who worked on it day in and day out and has design as his life career or a guy on an Internet board, hmmm, tough one.

Say it's ugly if that's your opinion but don't go projecting ideas that a large amount of thought didn't go into collaborating a project that also had a relatively small budget.
     
     
  #1752  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 8:54 PM
Danny D Oh Danny D Oh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry View Post
^ That makes no sense. Without the grey cup the riders only profited 1.1 in 2013 and doubled it in 2014. So its fairly consistent profit margins in sask. How in gods name do the riders run a 40M OB if the rest of the CFL is lower? they don't start making payments on new mosiac untill 2016. Is it that much more expensive to operate out west or is this a salary thing?

More to the point if the riders sell out a 30,000 seat building of which im going to assume are the most expensive seats in the league and make up for 33% of all merch sales and only turn a modest profit as far as pro sports go Its got to be tough for the eastern teams who have a hard time getting 25k into a building to break even let alone profit.

The bombers profited 3.9m in 2014 and 2.9m in 2013. Something is fishy here
In the Bombers case, the way they are defining "profit" is very crafty. If they wanted to be they could be in the red for the same amount. That doesn't include debt repayments, which will be significantly higher than their "profit" for at least the next decade.
     
     
  #1753  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 9:44 PM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
Ive said it before and ill say it again. In 2011 TD place would have been the set bar in the CFL stadium world. Even the north side stands would have blown peoples minds. Goes to show how far we've come as a league and as a country.

I like TD place myself. Its one of the most, if not the most intimate Stadium settings in the CFL and for 85 million? Not a bad outcome for such a budget limited project. However I do agree there was few dropped balls that could have made a world of difference and It's not just the North side. Why didn't they wrap that wood over top the south side stands for weather protection were talking an extra 15 feet of wood which I would imagine was costly but absolutely more necessary than that out of place weird statue thing they put up on the park side of the stadium i mean seriously what is that replica south side stadium pole structure thing meant for? Also Why didn't they do something more dramatic with the north side roof, I mean they rebuilt the dam thing they couldn't have been a little more imaginative for close to the same cost? Endzones... This is my biggest complaint regarding TD Place to me this was downright laziness from the designer. throw some concrete down and connect the 2 sides for god sakes were talking a couple hundred thousand dollars to give the stadium a finished look THF style if you will. No seating or tables needed although that would be awesome as well considering you can visually see how wrap around seating would flow almost flawlessly even just 5 rows on oneside and few party decks on the other for the super rowdys. But even without the additional seating a bit of concrete and some rails and another little bridge connecting the north side to the south side under the scoreboard would have given it more of a closed in sunken bowl stadium look.

My biggest complaint with TD place is the wood facade. I almost forget its even there when I think about the place it doesn't stick in my head at all. I would have much rather them either wrapped the stadium around it completely or just not have done it at all and went with a traditional facade in order to give the place a few more perks.

In the end It's the right size for Ottawa and the eastern CFL, Great intimate atmosphere, All the modern amenities you see in new buildings and The location is perfect, plus it really does look great too. But I do feel like too much was skipped

Last edited by Oilkountry; Jun 20, 2015 at 10:14 PM.
     
     
  #1754  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2015, 11:07 PM
Richard Lipschitz Richard Lipschitz is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
Uhh no, it was because I posted those few available drawings years ago to give people an idea of the what the article was saying.

Maybe plain in your uniformed opinion but the designer thought otherwise. Hmm, who do I believe understands this project, the guy who worked on it day in and day out and has design as his life career or a guy on an Internet board, hmmm, tough one.

Say it's ugly if that's your opinion but don't go projecting ideas that a large amount of thought didn't go into collaborating a project that also had a relatively small budget.
Wow what a pompous <censored> you are.
     
     
  #1755  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2015, 12:40 AM
EpicPonyTime's Avatar
EpicPonyTime EpicPonyTime is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Yellowfork
Posts: 1,168
I don't see what the problem with the north side stands is. An alternative would have been better, but there wasn't one given the budget and the arena underneath. Like it or not, the city was stuck with those stands and did their best in renovating them. If people are going to complain about that, hop in a time machine and go talk to the genuises who thought putting the Civic Centre underneath was a good idea.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry View Post
Endzones... This is my biggest complaint regarding TD Place to me this was downright laziness from the designer. throw some concrete down and connect the 2 sides for god sakes were talking a couple hundred thousand dollars to give the stadium a finished look THF style if you will. No seating or tables needed although that would be awesome as well considering you can visually see how wrap around seating would flow almost flawlessly even just 5 rows on oneside and few party decks on the other for the super rowdys. But even without the additional seating a bit of concrete and some rails and another little bridge connecting the north side to the south side under the scoreboard would have given it more of a closed in sunken bowl stadium look.
I disagree with you on the endzones. I really like the green space and think it adds a unique look to the stadium which isn't reflected anywhere else in the league. Given that the stadium is just one part of a complete renovation of Landsdowne Park from a sea of cement to a genuine park, I'm glad the redevelopment integrated the stadium into the surrounding area rather than surrounding it with more concrete.

Though I do agree with you when it comes to the laziness of some parts of it. The little path that connects the two sides looks really cheap, but hopefully that's just a temporary measure. It's clear they planned to add endzone seating at some point.
     
     
  #1756  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2015, 12:47 AM
FrankieFlowerpot's Avatar
FrankieFlowerpot FrankieFlowerpot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,478
Ah you're back again?

Re: Fatty/Butter/Richard up there
     
     
  #1757  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2015, 4:49 AM
Skyisnolimit's Avatar
Skyisnolimit Skyisnolimit is offline
Love skyscrapers
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: edmonton
Posts: 232
Love IGF in the Peg top notch design imo.
     
     
  #1758  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2015, 5:16 AM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyisnolimit View Post
Love IGF in the Peg top notch design imo.
Nobody is gonna disagree with you there. IGF has its faults but it will be in the top 3 stadiums in Canada talk for a long time.
     
     
  #1759  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2015, 10:02 AM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankieFlowerpot View Post
Ah you're back again? Re: Fatty/Butter/Richard up there
My thought as well. Time to check the ol' IP address.
     
     
  #1760  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2015, 4:40 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
Rogers Place, Edmonton:

     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:55 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.