HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1581  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 2:22 PM
GORDBO GORDBO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 305
I sure hope they don't throw up lights on the perimeter between henderson and Lag! The only logical thing to do , is build an overpass over Raleigh. And have access roads from there.
     
     
  #1582  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 2:48 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by rypinion View Post
On the assumption that the East St Paul/SmartCentres goes through - what do people think is the best way for the development to have road access?

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bre...232023151.html

It's easy, make the developer pay for a simple diamond interchange at the Perimeter and Gateway/Raleigh. If they want to get creative let them negotiate with the Province and work together regarding incorporating the active transportation bridge project to try and save some money and resources......otherwise the project is a no go. Developers need to pay the majority of infrastructure costs in the US, why not here?
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
     
     
  #1583  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 2:53 PM
oftheMoon's Avatar
oftheMoon oftheMoon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Exchanger
Posts: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
to bad the city is so gun hoe on taring the watkins building down
I don't know anything about the condition of this building or that the City wants it taken down, but it sure could be an iconic condo conversion for the Point Douglas area some years down the road as that area evolves.
     
     
  #1584  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 2:55 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
It's easy, make the developer pay for a simple diamond interchange at the Perimeter and Gateway/Raleigh. If they want to get creative let them negotiate with the Province and work together regarding incorporating the active transportation bridge project to try and save some money and resources......otherwise the project is a no go. Developers need to pay the majority of infrastructure costs in the US, why not here?
I agree 100%. And if building an interchange ruins the economics of the project, then build somewhere else where one wouldn't be necessary.
     
     
  #1585  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 3:41 PM
rypinion's Avatar
rypinion rypinion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Exchange, Winnipeg
Posts: 1,396
Where exactly is this shopping centre going? West or East of Raleigh? I've never been clear on that.
     
     
  #1586  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 3:45 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by rypinion View Post
Where exactly is this shopping centre going? West or East of Raleigh? I've never been clear on that.
East of Raleigh, sandwiched up to the Perimeter and Lagimodiere.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
     
     
  #1587  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 4:12 PM
steveosnyder steveosnyder is offline
North End Troublemaker
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: YWG
Posts: 1,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by rypinion View Post
On the assumption that the East St Paul/SmartCentres goes through - what do people think is the best way for the development to have road access?

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bre...232023151.html
First thing, Browaty is an idiot for thinking another access should be built on the 101 or Lagimodiere. Second, If you are going to build accesses in places like Headmaster and/or Raleigh/Gateway, you can expect people (and businesses) will use them for their needs. If you didn't want people to drive off Lag onto Headmaster then you shouldn't have built an intersection there.
     
     
  #1588  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 4:17 PM
steveosnyder steveosnyder is offline
North End Troublemaker
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: YWG
Posts: 1,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
It's easy, make the developer pay for a simple diamond interchange at the Perimeter and Gateway/Raleigh. If they want to get creative let them negotiate with the Province and work together regarding incorporating the active transportation bridge project to try and save some money and resources......otherwise the project is a no go. Developers need to pay the majority of infrastructure costs in the US, why not here?
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I agree 100%. And if building an interchange ruins the economics of the project, then build somewhere else where one wouldn't be necessary.
I have a huge problem with this... So the developer pays for the initial interchange, but the Province is on the hook for the maintenance, all so Walmart can build? I don't think this 1 mall will pay for the upkeep in tax revenues, so basically the people of Manitoba will be subsidizing this continuously, forever.

F**k that, no thanks.
     
     
  #1589  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 4:34 PM
factis factis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonaldSmith View Post

Neither link seems to work for me.
     
     
  #1590  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 4:43 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is online now
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,705
something shaking at the Dreman building

     
     
  #1591  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 4:46 PM
wags_in_the_peg's Avatar
wags_in_the_peg wags_in_the_peg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
something shaking at the Dreman building

]
Ahh, the building that is adverstising "new parking stalls" coming soon Sept 2009 or something like that. C'mon landlords, have a little pride and spend a few hundred bucks on a new sign. that sign has been up for 4-5 years.
__________________
just an ordinary Prairie Boy who loves to be in the loop on what is going on
     
     
  #1592  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 4:47 PM
DonaldSmith's Avatar
DonaldSmith DonaldSmith is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Wpg, Mb
Posts: 430
Quote:
Originally Posted by factis View Post
Neither link seems to work for me.
Clerks updated the agenda here is the new link:
http://winnipeg.ca/CLKDMIS/ViewPdf.asp?SectionId=351463

They also added an agenda item about Parcel 4. Unfortunately it looks like it will be walked on and there is no info at this time.
     
     
  #1593  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 4:57 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
something shaking at the Dreman building
That building has had a peculiar history. It was nearly vacant in the early 2000s before it was bought by a local owner and renovated. For a while it was either completely or nearly full, but then gradually tenants left, the lower level office space was converted to more parking, and now the office/retail space is for sale as condos, it appears.

I doubt that slapping a coat of black paint on the exterior is going to help the situation at all.
     
     
  #1594  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 5:17 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 15,809
The supercentre will never go through. Plan and simple. Land will go up for sale and some houses will be built. That's the only logical option and fit's in with the rest of the area.

FYI for everyone. East St. Paul residents are already mooching off the city. Glenway is the dividing line between ESP and CoW. So on Glenway and Foxgrove there about a 1.5 block wide by 5 block long chunk of houses that are on city sewer and water, but pay taxes to ESP. I know they get charged for it, but what about the IJC and their whole thing with the water an CentrePort. Same situation here.

North of Foxgrove, west of Raleigh, east of Henderson is currebtly being developed into residential commercial as well. Not sure who's water supply they'll be on.
     
     
  #1595  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 6:09 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Solution: Annexation or otherwise known as "boundary alteration". >>> E. St. Paul. Welcome to Winnipeg.
__________________
♥ ♥
     
     
  #1596  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 7:11 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
to bad the city is so gun hoe on taring the watkins building down
Is that the 8-9 story building in Point Douglas?
     
     
  #1597  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 7:18 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by rypinion View Post
On the assumption that the East St Paul/SmartCentres goes through - what do people think is the best way for the development to have road access?

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bre...232023151.html
Until the new clover-leaf is built on the clusterfuck called Lag. and Prov. highway 101 nothing should be built! What decade has the NDP decided that NE Winnipeg warrants a completed intersection, 2020, 2030? The money thrown at Centre Port Way should have been used for existing roadways which in my mind were a bigger priority! Wouldn't you think the time to complete the intersection should have coincided with the completion of the twinning on the perimeter back 10 years ago!
     
     
  #1598  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 7:22 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by GORDBO View Post
I sure hope they don't throw up lights on the perimeter between henderson and Lag! The only logical thing to do , is build an overpass over Raleigh. And have access roads from there.
What benefit other than for residents of East St. Paul does that serve? You want access to a new power centre you design an underpass/overpass off Lag. and upgrade De Vries from Henderson to the site, don't think East St. Paul would be too interested because they would actually have to PAY FOR SOMETHING for change!~

SteveO, BomberJet bang on as well!
     
     
  #1599  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 7:50 PM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 1,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
That building has had a peculiar history. It was nearly vacant in the early 2000s before it was bought by a local owner and renovated. For a while it was either completely or nearly full, but then gradually tenants left, the lower level office space was converted to more parking, and now the office/retail space is for sale as condos, it appears.

I doubt that slapping a coat of black paint on the exterior is going to help the situation at all.
Good info about that History here: http://winnipegdowntownplaces.blogsp...ge-avenue.html
     
     
  #1600  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2013, 7:51 PM
oftheMoon's Avatar
oftheMoon oftheMoon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Exchanger
Posts: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Is that the 8-9 story building in Point Douglas?
Yes it is: http://wbi.lib.umanitoba.ca/Winnipeg...ng.jsp?id=1231
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:18 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.