Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyAnderson
I agree, I was expressing sarcasm because you turned what someone said into a religious idea. I think any fairly intelligent person recognizes the use of the word sin as a synonym of wrong. So he was asking if it was wrong to want to drive a car, or drive on a freeway. It's not a religious issue.
I also think the idea of 'widening freeways causes more congestion' is inaccurate. I think the cause-effect relationship is the opposite. Widening freeways doesn't cause more people to drive on them. More people driving on them causes them to be widened.
The debate and challenge is figuring out if that'll work, if we want it, if we can support it, and at what point, if any, is it too much?
|
The Triple Convergence
Stuck in Traffic (1992), pp. 27-29, by Anthony Downs
"Nearly every vehicle driver normally searches for the quickest route, one that is shorter or less encumbered by obstacles (such as traffic signals or cross-streets) than most other routes. These direct routes are usually limited-access roads (freeways, expressways, or beltways) that are faster than local streets if they are not congested. Since most drivers know this, they converge on such 'best' routes from many points of origin.
The problem is that during the peak travel hours on weekdays, so many drivers converge on these 'best' routes that they become overloaded, particularly in metropolitan areas. Traffic on them eventually slows to the point where they have no advantage over the alternative routes. That is, a rough equilibrium is reached, which means that many drivers can get to their destinations just as fast on other roads. At times, the direct road may become even slower than alternative streets, and some drivers eager to save time will switch to them. Soon rough equality of travel times on both types of route is restored at the margin. The opposite happens if travel becomes slower on alternative streets than on the expressway.
Such observations can be made about this equilibrium situation: (1) it tends to recur, because most drivers develop habitual travel patterns; (2) during equilibrium each limited-access road is carrying more vehicles per hour than each normal city street or arterial route because it has more lanes, more direct routing, and fewer obstacles; (3) many drivers time their journeys to miss these periods because they do not like to waste time in heavy traffic; and (4) at the peak of equilibrium, traffic on most expressways is crawling along at a pace far below the optimal speed for those roads, as explained below.
Now suppose that the limited-access route undergoes a vast improvement -- its four lanes are expanded to eight. Once its carrying capacity is increased, the drivers using it move much faster than those using alternative routes. But this disequilibrium does not last long because word soon gets around that conditions on the expressway are superior.
In response, three types of convergence occur on the improved expressway: (1) many drivers who formerly used alternative routes during peak hours switch to the improved expressway
(spatial convergence); (2) many drivers who formerly traveled just before or after the peak hours start traveling during those hours
(time convergence); and (3) some commuters who used to take public transportation during peak hours now switch to driving, since it has become faster
(modal convergence).
The triple convergence causes more and more drivers to use the improved expressway during peak hours. Therefore its traffic volumes keep rising until vehicles are once again moving at a crawl during the peak period. This outcome is almost inescapable if peak-hour traffic was already slow before the highway was improved. If traffic is going faster than a crawl on this direct route at the peak hour, its users will still get to their destinations faster than users of city streets, which are less direct and more encumbered by signals and cross-streets. Total travel times on these two types of paths will only become equalized if the limited-access roads are so overloaded that vehicles on them are moving at slower speeds than those on normal streets. Triple convergence creates just such an effect during peak hours...
...In any event, expanding roadway capacity does not fully eliminate peak-hour traffic congestion, or even reduce the intensity of traffic jams during the most crowded periods -- although those periods will be shorter. In fact, it is almost impossible to eradicate peak-hour traffic congestion on limited-access roads once it has appeared within a nonshrinking community. In theory, such congestion could be eliminated only if the capacity of those roads were increased to the extent that they could carry every single commuter simultaneously at the peak minute at, say, 35 miles per hour or faster. In nearly all metropolitan areas, that is impossible. Therefore, expansions of road capacity -- no matter how large, within the limits of feasibility -- cannot fully eliminate periods of crawling along on expressways at frustratingly low speeds."
http://www.walkablestreets.com/triple.htm
Prev
This life is your last life right, enjoy it, stop worrying about if a freeway is used more than a rail line.
Linear Mode
