HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1521  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 2:36 AM
JerryK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by feepa View Post
Isnt that pretty much what he just said?
Yup, thanks man.....Just responded in a knee jerk reaction
     
     
  #1522  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 3:00 AM
JerryK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by murman View Post
A four storey concrete building?

In Edmonton?

I call BS.
Hey cabbage, I .... no.....we are laughing at your shit, you are comic entertainment for us in edmonton or Los Angeles
     
     
  #1523  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 3:23 AM
whyteknight's Avatar
whyteknight whyteknight is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 300
What about something like this for the commonwealth lands?

From SW:


From NW:


From SE:
     
     
  #1524  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 4:06 AM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by murman View Post
Edmonton, this is nothing short of a F*CKING embarrassment. I've seen nicer Super 8's. You really don't care about your city, do you? Where's your vaunted design review committee? Too busy on a junket to Vegreville to study their take on 21st century architecture? Will you PLEASE stop doing this to your city???????
I agree with Murman - the project is a FRICKEN joke - the Design Committee mandate needs to be broadened to beyond downtown!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
     
  #1525  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 4:44 AM
murman murman is offline
Dreaming in Colour
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMD UW View Post
/\ It is concrete so says the website.

Sure it's a POS lowrise, but let's not kid ourselves, there are plenty of these in other cities. Yes Vancouver, even you.
So that somehow absolves Edmonton? For shame.

And PS... for all we know, by concrete they mean concrete block. Now that's fitting for Edmonton.
     
     
  #1526  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 5:11 AM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
If the EDC had control outside of downtown, Carrington and Park Place would be out of business. (@ Carrington... Urban Village!?! You have to be kidding...)
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #1527  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 3:54 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by murman View Post
So that somehow absolves Edmonton? For shame.

And PS... for all we know, by concrete they mean concrete block. Now that's fitting for Edmonton.
Murman. Crap does have to be built in every city. I'm thankful this is not downtown, or in a very prominant area.

feepa
     
     
  #1528  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 4:21 PM
murman murman is offline
Dreaming in Colour
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by feepa View Post
Murman. Crap does have to be built in every city. I'm thankful this is not downtown, or in a very prominant area.

feepa
Crap HAS to be built? Not in my universe.

I'm glad you're not on the design committee.

I continue to be surprised how many Edmontonians feel they have to justify mediocrity. Maybe I should stop being surprised, and just come to expect it as one of Edmonton's many charms.
     
     
  #1529  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 4:53 PM
CanadianCentaur's Avatar
CanadianCentaur CanadianCentaur is offline
Briareos Hecatonchires
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Big E
Posts: 3,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by feepa View Post
Murman. Crap does have to be built in every city. I'm thankful this is not downtown, or in a very prominant area.

feepa
Don't forget that we should also be thankful it's not a tall highrise, either!
__________________
Edmonton/Amiskwacîwâskahikan Lat. 53° 34'N Elevation 671 m (2201 ft) Pop. 1,010,899 (2021 city) 1,418,118 (2021 metro) - North America's northernmost metro area over one million.
     
     
  #1530  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 5:50 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
I've lived in several cities and I've seen a fair amount of crap. In Vancouver, the massive numbers of stick- built condos with leaky building envellopes and interior humidity problems is an example of poor design and improper applicaton for the environment. In Calgary, there are stick built condos all around the beltline, low rise condos where proper planning should have stepped in, and a proliferaton of conversion projects, in which 50 year old buildngs are given a gaudy facelift and sold as new, even though the building mechanicals and power systems are left original. Disgusting. Some of the original condos on the west end are pretty uninspiuring as well. Edmonton designs seem to be uninspiring, take the condos on 109 street north of the Save-on for example.

It's getting better in Calgary and Edmonton, but a far cry from the good projects going up in Port Moody and Downtown Vancouver.
     
     
  #1531  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 5:56 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,559
Someone please help this post out.
We need to help adjust attitudes about Downtown Edmonton.
http://www.connect2edmonton.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1612
     
     
  #1532  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 6:00 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by murman View Post
Crap HAS to be built? Not in my universe.

I'm glad you're not on the design committee.

I continue to be surprised how many Edmontonians feel they have to justify mediocrity. Maybe I should stop being surprised, and just come to expect it as one of Edmonton's many charms.
Well, your universe must just delete things as you wisk away in your vehicle off to la-la land, where everything is of perfect taste and completely utopian. Oh wait, you are from Lotus Land, god, theres nothing wrong with anything built in Vancouver, or Calgary, or Toronto, or ______? get real man
Are you oblivious to the world around you?
Sometimes, I think you are bang on with your post murman, but this ... just reaks of you trying to be an all out elistist, saying this crap is limited to Edmonton.
Yes, I dont like this project, but thank god its out of the core, not in a valueable location, and damn, its not a highrise. I'm not even sure why it made this thread.
     
     
  #1533  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 6:04 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240glt View Post
I've lived in several cities and I've seen a fair amount of crap. In Vancouver, the massive numbers of stick- built condos with leaky building envellopes and interior humidity problems is an example of poor design and improper applicaton for the environment. In Calgary, there are stick built condos all around the beltline, low rise condos where proper planning should have stepped in, and a proliferaton of conversion projects, in which 50 year old buildngs are given a gaudy facelift and sold as new, even though the building mechanicals and power systems are left original. Disgusting. Some of the original condos on the west end are pretty uninspiuring as well. Edmonton designs seem to be uninspiring, take the condos on 109 street north of the Save-on for example.

It's getting better in Calgary and Edmonton, but a far cry from the good projects going up in Port Moody and Downtown Vancouver.
Ya, and this project isn't being built in Downtown Edmonton, or Ole Strathcona.

Those condos you refer to are crap, and built during a economic slump. Are you trying to tell me theres nothing in Vancouver thats uninspiring that has been built in the last 10-15 years?

Think of the current projects that are starting to get built now, such as Century Park, and Icon. This is the way our latest development is going.
     
     
  #1534  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 6:19 PM
murman murman is offline
Dreaming in Colour
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by feepa View Post
Well, your universe must just delete things as you wisk away in your vehicle off to la-la land, where everything is of perfect taste and completely utopian. Oh wait, you are from Lotus Land, god, theres nothing wrong with anything built in Vancouver, or Calgary, or Toronto, or ______? get real man
Are you oblivious to the world around you?
Sometimes, I think you are bang on with your post murman, but this ... just reaks of you trying to be an all out elistist, saying this crap is limited to Edmonton.
Yes, I dont like this project, but thank god its out of the core, not in a valueable location, and damn, its not a highrise. I'm not even sure why it made this thread.
You'll like my new sig then. I've never said there aren't design horrors elsewhere. Trust me, quite the opposite. In Edmonton's case however, it's almost as if the city excels in design mediocrity, with absolutely no clue about how to pull itself out of its small-town very-prairie mindset. There's a big world out there; discover it and learn from it.

STOP DEFENDING MEDIOCRITY.
     
     
  #1535  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 6:21 PM
murman murman is offline
Dreaming in Colour
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by feepa View Post
Ya, and this project isn't being built in Downtown Edmonton, or Ole Strathcona.

Those condos you refer to are crap, and built during a economic slump. Are you trying to tell me theres nothing in Vancouver thats uninspiring that has been built in the last 10-15 years?
Oh, sorry, my mistake.

These are PERFECT reasons for Edmonton to build crap:

1) it's not downtown

2) other cities have crap too

     
     
  #1536  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 6:47 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by murman View Post
You'll like my new sig then. I've never said there aren't design horrors elsewhere. Trust me, quite the opposite. In Edmonton's case however, it's almost as if the city excels in design mediocrity, with absolutely no clue about how to pull itself out of its small-town very-prairie mindset. There's a big world out there; discover it and learn from it.

STOP DEFENDING MEDIOCRITY.
I would argue, murman, that you are not the target demographic for Edmonton, so I wouldn't worry too much.

Edmonton isn't for everybody. Those that believe the opposite are typically Blind Vancouverites that can't see beyond their utopian like dream world.
     
     
  #1537  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 6:56 PM
murman murman is offline
Dreaming in Colour
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by feepa View Post
I would argue, murman, that you are not the target demographic for Edmonton, so I wouldn't worry too much.

Edmonton isn't for everybody. Those that believe the opposite are typically Blind Vancouverites that can't see beyond their utopian like dream world.
What makes you think that this is a Vancouver vs. Edmonton thing? Not sure how you reached that conclusion, but if it makes your belief system align properly, have at 'er.
     
     
  #1538  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 7:41 PM
CDE's Avatar
CDE CDE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 156
That thing in garneau makes me want to cry.
     
     
  #1539  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 7:44 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,027
Feepa vs Murman - First blood - live @ rexall jan 18th, 2007.


Edmontonians SHOULD NOT DEFEND THIS KIND OF PROJECT

Crap IS NOT ACCEPTABLE....simple as that, vancouver, calgary, edmonton...doesnt matter.

"not a prominent area".....i seem to have forgotten that the borders of garneau have become a slum....

Edmonton can choose its future and if this is the way we are going, i dont know how much longer i can be here.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #1540  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2006, 7:51 PM
CDE's Avatar
CDE CDE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 156
Plain and simple that Garneau project is a combination of a shit developer and a shit architect/builder teaming up. Brutal incompetence.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.