HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1481  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 12:48 AM
0773|=\ 0773|=\ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
wrong...it has been discussed in the "right circles" i do believe. Stupid that it is NOT DONE.
Not really. They're completely re-aligning the highway in a few years. Why would they light 15kms of highway if it's going to be moved 1/2 a mile to the west in a few years (to accommodate an outer-outer-ring road's system's interchange with the intermodal site's location)? They're saving millions by waiting.
     
     
  #1482  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 1:08 AM
0773|=\ 0773|=\ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,256
I don't know how HSR got on this topic, but seriously, I think that this is a classic case of traffic between Edmonton and Calgary being created, as opposed to being removed from the QE2. I honestly believe that in this case, if you build it, traffic will come, because 1 hour from downtown to downtown without security waits is just too attractive for a lot of people to pass up. It's nice enough that some people could actually work in Calgary and live in Edmonton, or vice-versa.

On the other hand, I do wonder if this venture is artificially environmentally friendly (powering this rail has to come from somewhere, right?), but if it's integrated with a station @ YEG which would give all Edmontonians easier access to their airport, I think I'd actually be leaning more in favor of this project than not. I'd rather see this ease traffic between our cities than an extra lane each way on the QE2 (THAT is a colossal waste of money, and this is coming from someone who loves freeways).
     
     
  #1483  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 2:07 AM
Edmonchuck's Avatar
Edmonchuck Edmonchuck is offline
why try anymore
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where we can lose things, and replace them with nothing...or a wananbe yaletown
Posts: 3,314
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0773|=\ View Post
I don't know how HSR got on this topic, but seriously, I think that this is a classic case of traffic between Edmonton and Calgary being created, as opposed to being removed from the QE2. I honestly believe that in this case, if you build it, traffic will come, because 1 hour from downtown to downtown without security waits is just too attractive for a lot of people to pass up. It's nice enough that some people could actually work in Calgary and live in Edmonton, or vice-versa.

Because as long as the flight remains within Alberta from YXD (and doesn't connect elsewhere that requires security), you don't need security.

It is like they have it now. HSR is EDM-CAL no security. Peace Air was YXD-YYC no security and no 10 billlion in infrastructure.
__________________
Change is impossible if the impediments to it remain in positions of power. Some people need to retire, and in Edmonton speak, that means they will die in their office.
     
     
  #1484  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 3:22 AM
0773|=\ 0773|=\ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edmonchuck View Post
Because as long as the flight remains within Alberta from YXD (and doesn't connect elsewhere that requires security), you don't need security.

It is like they have it now. HSR is EDM-CAL no security. Peace Air was YXD-YYC no security and no 10 billlion in infrastructure.
Do you think no-security will last for the forseeable future? Also, I thought the HSR estimates were more in the $3-5 billion range...
     
     
  #1485  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 4:00 AM
Edmonchuck's Avatar
Edmonchuck Edmonchuck is offline
why try anymore
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where we can lose things, and replace them with nothing...or a wananbe yaletown
Posts: 3,314
5+. still waaaaaay more expensive than using an FBO.

As long as it stays w/in AB and does not deplane/enplane in a secure area, then yes.
__________________
Change is impossible if the impediments to it remain in positions of power. Some people need to retire, and in Edmonton speak, that means they will die in their office.
     
     
  #1486  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 4:11 AM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
FBO's do offer a totally different aspect to travel, mind you most user's are people with too much money flying on private aircraft.But as a example there is Integra air who flys from YEG to Lethbridge and Ft.Mac and uses a FBO were the rental cars are onsite,free WIFI,plus free coffee and snacks while pax wait for the flight.The no security is a big bonus aswell for these pax who can now show up 5 minutes before departure...

Saw the total numbers for the year today and ohhhhh are they good.

Somebody has to notice the growth pattern and demand for other points, oh wait they did.Cant wait!!!
     
     
  #1487  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 5:16 AM
Edmonchuck's Avatar
Edmonchuck Edmonchuck is offline
why try anymore
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where we can lose things, and replace them with nothing...or a wananbe yaletown
Posts: 3,314
HAHHAHAHAHA tuffyy, you tease.
__________________
Change is impossible if the impediments to it remain in positions of power. Some people need to retire, and in Edmonton speak, that means they will die in their office.
     
     
  #1488  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 4:08 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,861
In the Edmonton Sun Sat morning Yukon Jack has a column that supports opening the Muni.

I have a suggestion. If YEG has a big announcement coming up maybe it would be a good time to call a press conference and announce it now? It could take the starch out of the ongoing Muni Debate and allow EAA people to explain why it would be a bad move to startup the Muni again - get their point across so to speak.
     
     
  #1489  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 5:44 PM
S_B_Russell's Avatar
S_B_Russell S_B_Russell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Genève
Posts: 631
If Yukon Jack is jumping on the muni bandwagon YEG has nothing to worry about. I didn't know his expertise went beyond professional wrestling.
__________________
I used to jog but the ice cubes kept falling out of my glass.
     
     
  #1490  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 5:44 PM
TimB09 TimB09 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket252 View Post
In the Edmonton Sun Sat morning Yukon Jack has a column that supports opening the Muni.

I have a suggestion. If YEG has a big announcement coming up maybe it would be a good time to call a press conference and announce it now? It could take the starch out of the ongoing Muni Debate and allow EAA people to explain why it would be a bad move to startup the Muni again - get their point across so to speak.
Wait wait...Yukon Jack has an article in the Edmonton Sun? About the Muni? Wow...the Sun MUST be a tabloid to let a guy like that write an article.
Stick to the Radio Yukon!
     
     
  #1491  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 7:17 PM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,008
Ziiiiiiiiiiing....

tuffy - numbers are that good eh. I think 08 will be a verrry veerrry interesting year for YEG.
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
     
     
  #1492  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 7:54 PM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
^Yep they should be released shortly, 2008 will see things happen that will make them look even shinier.
     
     
  #1493  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2008, 11:31 PM
ibz's Avatar
ibz ibz is offline
GT Champion
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,734
Lol this is what we get for teasing you guys about new office towers no one could talk about! haha

Things are really starting to roll for YEG, although I still wonder why Second Cup is never open..
__________________
...
     
     
  #1494  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2008, 6:26 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
It was open when we flew back on the 2nd. (both pre and post security)
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #1495  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2008, 6:37 PM
oilfan's Avatar
oilfan oilfan is offline
Go Oilers
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 32
I hear that along with construction of the terminal expansion and hotel, that there will be a new cargo terminal that is going to be built. I wonder if this is part of Port Alberta, which we should be hearing more about soon!

Could this be the "big" news? Or are we looking at some increased passenger service as well??
     
     
  #1496  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2008, 6:50 PM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,008
I was thinking the same thing, I think this announcement may have something to do with the Port Alberta, but I'm not sure.

I also anticipate hearing new service sometimes during 08 as YEGs PAX numbers have reached a new milestone ~ +6 million PAX.
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
     
     
  #1497  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2008, 8:24 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,559
I wonder if its going to involve a major player like CN or CP... along with that whole Port Alberta thing, and a major development in that, combined with the big airport expansion plans. Could we also see some sort of announcement for BUS/LRT service to YEG?
     
     
  #1498  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2008, 8:54 PM
oilfan's Avatar
oilfan oilfan is offline
Go Oilers
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 32
I understand that CP is building a terminal south of the city. Although CN already has a terminal in the west-end, I could see them building something too, considering they are the ones who have the tracks out to Prince Rupert.
     
     
  #1499  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2008, 9:21 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilfan View Post
I understand that CP is building a terminal south of the city. Although CN already has a terminal in the west-end, I could see them building something too, considering they are the ones who have the tracks out to Prince Rupert.
Unless CN sees a huge interlinking option, with the Henday and QE2 there should be no difficulty moving cargo from the CN terminal to the airport by road. You don't ship something across the ocean by boat to then 'last mile' it by air, it doesn't really make sense unless it is being shipped to the Canadian North.

With the cargo projections in the ERAA documents being so low for the next 40 years, I think they realize this too. Port Alberta is more about developing more airport land as trade parks, to provide a secondary non air dependent revenue stream to the airport than increasing cargo growth.

It is also about branding to provide new energy and better consumer identification with the airport as a IO operation.
     
     
  #1500  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2008, 5:56 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
Rumor has it that the new terminal project will hit the streets today. Can't wait to see what it looks like. One thing is for sure: It is going to be HUGE.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:22 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.