HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #14141  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2019, 6:30 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
I am worndering what effect the grounding, by Trump, and as I understand by Air Canada, of all 737- max jets will have on flights, and on passenger capacity not only at YVR but elsewhere.
How long will the grounding last (anyone have an idea?) ... what per centage is already carried by 737-max (any airline), and what model of aircraft can be used to pinch-hit?
Most of the world banned the max aircraft. Canada and the US were the last to hold out. Canada grounded the aircraft and then a few hours later the US followed.

Both WestJet and AC have significant fleets of MAX. They are just going to move aircraft around and cancel flights.

Boeing is working on some software changes to remove the bug that caused the first crash (and potentially the second one was the same software bug). We are probably a few weeks away from the software upgrade being ready and installed.
     
     
  #14142  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2019, 5:12 PM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
Airplanes using the North runway aren’t flying over marpole residents heads. It’s still south of the river. Seems like a win/win for everyone. Having a curfew on the north runway makes no sense
So was the South Runway until they started dumping people into Richmond T. Centre.

This is Richmond's, and the resident's fault, not YVRs.

Not to mention the North Runway's flight path actually goes above Bridgeport Stn, not the river, where in a couple years, there's going to be exactly the same problem from residents.

The North Runway is also shorter than the South Runway, so less versatile.
     
     
  #14143  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2019, 5:58 PM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
So was the South Runway until they started dumping people into Richmond T. Centre.

This is Richmond's, and the resident's fault, not YVRs.

Not to mention the North Runway's flight path actually goes above Bridgeport Stn, not the river, where in a couple years, there's going to be exactly the same problem from residents.

The North Runway is also shorter than the South Runway, so less versatile.
Using the North runway will have less impact on less people though. Like I said it’s a win/win. Marpole residents won’t notice it and less people in Richmond will hear the planes.
     
     
  #14144  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2019, 7:02 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
The solution spears to be simple, and it's not moving the airplanes.

Either way, do these people think that moving the planes to the North Runway is going to solve anything? People living in Marpole are going to complain, then.

If Richmond didn't want to deal with Airplane noise, Richmond City Centre shouldn't have been designated so close to the airport, and the warehouses should have been kept. What do they think's going to happen when Richmond dumps people right next to an airplane runway?
Richmond has been an example of disastrous planning for years. They knowingly keep approving development under the flightpath.
     
     
  #14145  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2019, 9:07 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Richmond has been an example of disastrous planning for years. They knowingly keep approving development under the flightpath.
Hmmmm... kind of like how they approved multi-residential right next to the Steveston/Hwy 99 interchange, and then the Hwy 99 upgrade was proposed. I got lots of good laughs at Richmond staff's hissy-fits freaking out at the Province, but it was really dumb-@ass planning on the city's part to put a project like that right next to a major highway interchange.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #14146  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2019, 10:25 PM
thenoflyzone thenoflyzone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,295
According to someone on airliners.net, AC301/302 YUL-YVR-YUL will be flown by a TS A332 as of next week.
     
     
  #14147  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2019, 6:27 PM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
Using the North runway will have less impact on less people though. Like I said it’s a win/win. Marpole residents won’t notice it and less people in Richmond will hear the planes.
Until the Duck Island redevelopment is complete, then THOSE people will be complaining about living under the flightpath.
     
     
  #14148  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2019, 8:59 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,076
So much of getting rid of Rouge...

With the grounding of 737 MAX, Rouge 767 will be back to Vancouver

YVR-HNL
March: 1x daily 77W
April: 1x daily 788
May: 1x daily Rouge 767
June: 1x daily Rouge 767

YVR-OGG
March: 1x daily 789
April: 1x daily Rouge 767
May: 1x daily Rouge 767
June: 1x daily Rouge 767

For the month of May, there will be also 1x daily YVR-YYZ with Rouge 767.
     
     
  #14149  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 12:26 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Richmond has been an example of disastrous planning for years. They knowingly keep approving development under the flightpath.
The fact that even under a flight path developers continue to invest in the area shows that’s quite brilliant planning. You don’t think the densification along No. 3 road is good?
     
     
  #14150  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 7:03 PM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
The fact that even under a flight path developers continue to invest in the area shows that’s quite brilliant planning. You don’t think the densification along No. 3 road is good?
I would think removing industrial lands (like the South Fraserlands) is disastrous planning, but that doesn't stop people from investing heavily in the area.

Or the Surrey LRT. Developers started snatching up property in Newton in anticipation, until it got kiboshed.

Just because an area is being invested heavily in, it's not necessarily good planning. It means there's demand for new property. (plus, the property tax is a LVT, meaning that investors have every incentive to build, or even overbuild, to mitigate tax $$$.)

The densification on No.3 Rd isn't exactly bad- it's not like the Canada Line extends south of it- just Richmond shouldn't be complaining when people complain- it's their fault.
     
     
  #14151  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2019, 2:57 PM
Rogie's Avatar
Rogie Rogie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 433
Harbour Air is looking to go all-electric.

A Beaver will be converted and tested starting later this year, with the aim to certify by 2022 and the goal to eventually convert the whole fleet to electric.

https://westernaviationnews.com/2019/03/26/harbour-air-magnix-electric-aviation/
__________________
Western Aviation News
     
     
  #14152  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2019, 8:29 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,016
March 24, 2019 5:27 pm
Place your bets: Vancouver airport holds bracket to find best-looking plane

By Sean Boynton Online Journalist Global News

Beauty contests may be fading in popularity, but what about when planes are involved?

Vancouver International Airport is putting that to the test by holding a contest on its Instagram page to find out which airplane flying in and out of YVR has the best look of the bunch.

Dubbed “Last Livery Standing,” the bracket features 32 planes that service Metro Vancouver, broken into four “conferences”: domestic, international/U.S., Asia-Pacific and a “special” category that includes limited-edition planes like WestJet’s Mickey Mouse jet.


from twitter

...

https://globalnews.ca/news/5091017/yvr-best-looking-plane-contest/
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #14153  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2019, 7:30 AM
zahav zahav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,052
January stats posted, and mediocre results with some surprises:

Domestic: +3.5%
Transborder: +2.4%
International: +6.3% (Asia Pac +9.8%, Europe -1.2%, Misc. -0.3%)

Surprsied by the strength in Asia Pac, surprised by the decline in Europe and Misc., which had been posting huge % gains all last year. What happened in January, was there any major geopolitical issue that could've explained the drop?
     
     
  #14154  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2019, 2:45 PM
thenoflyzone thenoflyzone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav View Post
January stats posted, and mediocre results with some surprises:

Domestic: +3.5%
Transborder: +2.4%
International: +6.3% (Asia Pac +9.8%, Europe -1.2%, Misc. -0.3%)

Surprsied by the strength in Asia Pac, surprised by the decline in Europe and Misc., which had been posting huge % gains all last year. What happened in January, was there any major geopolitical issue that could've explained the drop?
It's still an overall 4.0% increase. Dec 2018 was even weaker. (+2.8%)

Intl charters seem to have taken a hit in January.
     
     
  #14155  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2019, 4:38 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav View Post
January stats posted, and mediocre results with some surprises:

Domestic: +3.5%
Transborder: +2.4%
International: +6.3% (Asia Pac +9.8%, Europe -1.2%, Misc. -0.3%)

Surprsied by the strength in Asia Pac, surprised by the decline in Europe and Misc., which had been posting huge % gains all last year. What happened in January, was there any major geopolitical issue that could've explained the drop?
That slight January 2019 dip in European traffic just might have been caused by the Yellow Vest uprisings all over the streets, and powerful anti-immigrant movements in Germany and elsewhere. In Paris, the police have been using teargas and rubber bullets.
In Germany, many mainsream citizens are takin' it to the streets. It's very tense here right now; maybe that's it.
Europe is in a real shake-up right now with a mangled BREXIT deal hanging over it, member nations rumbling about leaving the EU, a major shift to the political right (related to the migrant issue) ... and a feeling of uncertainty and malaise. Not the best conditions for attracting tourists.
     
     
  #14156  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2019, 6:45 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav View Post
Surprsied by the strength in Asia Pac, surprised by the decline in Europe and Misc., which had been posting huge % gains all last year. What happened in January, was there any major geopolitical issue that could've explained the drop?
Well there are almost no carriers flying Vancouver --> Europe in January, so any little change is a big % difference.

Non daily service from KLM and AF, daily Lufthansa to Frankfurt and daily AC/BA to London.

The actual drop was 273 people. That's less than one flight. Could have even been a cancellation and people were routed through other Canadian airports so the PAX were recorded as domestic not International.

I'm pretty pleased with 4% growth. I think this year is going to be abysmal for YVR, given the amount of cuts coming to international flying this summer. Only good years from domestic and transborder will keep things positive.

With most of the S19 changes wrapped up I'll post my summer frequency/seats tracker.



As you can see seats in 2019 are actually 2.6% lower than 2018, so I'm expecting flat to negative growth this summer internationally. AsiaPac in particular looks brutal with cuts all over.
     
     
  #14157  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2019, 7:07 PM
Rogie's Avatar
Rogie Rogie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 433
YVR was awarded the Skytrax award for Best Airport in North America for the 10th straight year, beating out Denver and Atlanta. Toronto was 7th, Montreal 10th.

https://wp.me/p2cMjz-tU
__________________
Western Aviation News
     
     
  #14158  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2019, 8:20 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,016
Is there a direct flight from Vancouver to Singapore?

A friend is going to Singapore next week and he said his flight is direct but I didn't know we had direct flights there.
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #14159  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2019, 12:16 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Well there are almost no carriers flying Vancouver --> Europe in January, so any little change is a big % difference.

Non daily service from KLM and AF, daily Lufthansa to Frankfurt and daily AC/BA to London.

The actual drop was 273 people. That's less than one flight. Could have even been a cancellation and people were routed through other Canadian airports so the PAX were recorded as domestic not International.

I'm pretty pleased with 4% growth. I think this year is going to be abysmal for YVR, given the amount of cuts coming to international flying this summer. Only good years from domestic and transborder will keep things positive.

With most of the S19 changes wrapped up I'll post my summer frequency/seats tracker.



As you can see seats in 2019 are actually 2.6% lower than 2018, so I'm expecting flat to negative growth this summer internationally. AsiaPac in particular looks brutal with cuts all over.
Thanks again for your awesome chart! I’ll audit it later

I guess YVR couldn’t continue with that unprecedented growth over the last three years. Comparing the chart to 10 years ago though you sure get a good idea how far YVR has managed to grow. Definitely a year of slower growth in 2019. 4% isn’t anything to sneeze at though.
     
     
  #14160  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2019, 1:09 AM
Rogie's Avatar
Rogie Rogie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post
Thanks again for your awesome chart! I’ll audit it later

I guess YVR couldn’t continue with that unprecedented growth over the last three years. Comparing the chart to 10 years ago though you sure get a good idea how far YVR has managed to grow. Definitely a year of slower growth in 2019. 4% isn’t anything to sneeze at though.
You're right. 4% may give them a little breathing room to catch up with all the construction projects going on.
__________________
Western Aviation News
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:15 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.