HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2024, 12:35 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,468
Deleted - dupe post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2024, 12:38 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav View Post
The combined AC/UA flight schedule is very strong, and all mainline to boot. I had posted on the Canada Airport thread that YVR will be the only Canadian airport with both AC and UA service to all seven of UA's hubs (not counting Guam, which doesn't even have UA flights to the mainland US).

Definitely a solid showing by WS. Johnny Aussie, I counted 12 destinations this summer, not 11, unless I am missing something? Atlanta, Honolulu, Kahului, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Orange County, Orlando, Palm Springs, Detroit, Nashville, San Diego, San Francisco. I am not mad at having WS take over from DL on several transborder routes (ATL, LAX, DTW, all of which DL has served at some point in the past, and handed them to WS with DL codeshare). I feel like solidifying WS's place is more important for YVR than having DL operate these; it boosts the overall flights by our 2nd biggest carrier, and still keeps the codeshare from DL for US connections. I am also happy that WS stuck it out with OGG. The devastating fires a few months ago really hurt Maui, and airlines like AC dropped it for the summer. But WS kept daily flights, so I'm sure they will reap the benefits of being the only carrier on the route. Maui is bouncing back, and is always a popular choice for West Coasters, so very happy WS stuck it out. WS and AC have really reached an equilibrium in terms of sharing transborder routes (WS has traditionally been on routes like PSP and SNA, but then AC moved in). Glad to see the shared leisure routes have absorbed the capacity and both carriers are steady (WS basically wiped out AC in YYC, and AC massively cut down WS in YYZ, but they've both kept a steady schedule here.

Small update I noticed, AF is switching from the A359 to 777-300. It appears to be an increase in seats as well (the A359 has either 324 or 292 pax, while the 777 has either 369, 381, or 472 seats). I never know how to tell which variant is operating a route, as the schedules only list the equipment, not the configuration. But even assuming the high end for the 359 at 324, and the low end for the 777 at 369, it is still a bump. I am not sure about which is a nicer experience however, the 777 are quite old and the 359s brand new, so might be a downgrade in interior, but is a boost is capacity. And 777-300s are nice and beefy, glad to see both AF and KLM operating their largest planes here.
Sorry yes 12 by Westjet. The list posted didn’t have SAN as a WS destination.
Very impressive showing and so diverse with so many flights by non Canadian carriers. AC’s list of Transborder destinations continues to impress as well. OGG has been gutted with so many flights cancelled. No doubt it will bounce back and AC will return year round. YVR’s year round flights to Europe on full service carriers is excellent especially considering the geographic disadvantage.
Definitely punching way above its weight… and yes as mentioned even without the China flights bouncing back. The number of international carriers fantastic.
Flying out on Friday on NZ was a very pleasant experience. Intl Maple Leaf lounge struggling to cope despite (at the time we were there) only LHR and MEX on AC and AKL on NZ. Cannot imagine what it would be like later in the evening or peak early afternoon. Lounges seem to be struggling everywhere. Within the last two months visited SQ, NZ, AI, LH, LO and OS lounges and it’s a very similar situation. Lack of space and staff in most cases.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2024, 5:58 AM
hehehe hehehe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: YYC--> BNE
Posts: 1,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post
Sorry yes 12 by Westjet. The list posted didn’t have SAN as a WS destination.
Very impressive showing and so diverse with so many flights by non Canadian carriers. AC’s list of Transborder destinations continues to impress as well. OGG has been gutted with so many flights cancelled. No doubt it will bounce back and AC will return year round. YVR’s year round flights to Europe on full service carriers is excellent especially considering the geographic disadvantage.
Definitely punching way above its weight… and yes as mentioned even without the China flights bouncing back. The number of international carriers fantastic.
Flying out on Friday on NZ was a very pleasant experience. Intl Maple Leaf lounge struggling to cope despite (at the time we were there) only LHR and MEX on AC and AKL on NZ. Cannot imagine what it would be like later in the evening or peak early afternoon. Lounges seem to be struggling everywhere. Within the last two months visited SQ, NZ, AI, LH, LO and OS lounges and it’s a very similar situation. Lack of space and staff in most cases.
I flew YVR-BNE a year back and the lounge was absolutely crowded. But YVR is an excellent airport and has huge potential, and overall the connecting experience at YVR is quite good.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2024, 10:26 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav View Post
Small update I noticed, AF is switching from the A359 to 777-300. It appears to be an increase in seats as well (the A359 has either 324 or 292 pax, while the 777 has either 369, 381, or 472 seats). I never know how to tell which variant is operating a route, as the schedules only list the equipment, not the configuration.
Looks like it's the 369 seat variant, their second most premium configuration. Great sign for the route!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2024, 12:12 AM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
With this latest AF boost I wanted to check in on S24 Vs S19 Europe capacity again.

To no one's surprise AC is the only major airline at YVR to have a decline in European seat capacity at YVR. The only other airline with a decline is Icelandair.



I always understood the Europe flights to be popular subcontinent flights too. With the AC Delhi flight gone and connections through China gone, one would think there would be a boost to seats to Europe. Apparently not according to AC. BA and AF/KLM seem to be happy to jump in and steal PAX, as are Westjet through YYC im sure.

Pretty disappointing attention AC are paying to their 3rd 'hub'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2024, 12:19 AM
JakeLRS's Avatar
JakeLRS JakeLRS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 877
Porter to open YVR base October 2024
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2024, 1:21 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
With this latest AF boost I wanted to check in on S24 Vs S19 Europe capacity again.

To no one's surprise AC is the only major airline at YVR to have a decline in European seat capacity at YVR. The only other airline with a decline is Icelandair.



I always understood the Europe flights to be popular subcontinent flights too. With the AC Delhi flight gone and connections through China gone, one would think there would be a boost to seats to Europe. Apparently not according to AC. BA and AF/KLM seem to be happy to jump in and steal PAX, as are Westjet through YYC im sure.

Pretty disappointing attention AC are paying to their 3rd 'hub'.
You forget WS, which is -100%. Even more disappointing since YVR is their second-largest base?
Oh, and TS is also -100%.

With DEL gone, AC replaces it with DXB (winter seasonal for now, but may eventually go year-round).

With China gone, AC replaces it with additional flights to HKG, as well as BKK/SIN.

Remember, AC is still more than 20 widebody planes down from their peak in 2019. That's about 20 daily flights they need to cut across their hubs. YVR cut was about 5 daily for the summer, and a single daily during winter. Well within our share.

There should be something new coming when AC start receiving the XLRs in 2025, assuming no further delays...

Also, for ZRH AC now codeshare with WK, so it's a confirmation that they just transfer the route to their *A partner. Maybe next summer LX will take over the service and/or turn it to year-round?

Last edited by nname; Feb 9, 2024 at 1:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2024, 1:23 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
With this latest AF boost I wanted to check in on S24 Vs S19 Europe capacity again.

To no one's surprise AC is the only major airline at YVR to have a decline in European seat capacity at YVR. The only other airline with a decline is Icelandair.



I always understood the Europe flights to be popular subcontinent flights too. With the AC Delhi flight gone and connections through China gone, one would think there would be a boost to seats to Europe. Apparently not according to AC. BA and AF/KLM seem to be happy to jump in and steal PAX, as are Westjet through YYC im sure.

Pretty disappointing attention AC are paying to their 3rd 'hub'.

Yes, really quite a mean surprise to see the numbers down so much. Is it because they want most European traffic funnelled through YUL and YYZ?
Or are there route possibilities they won't look into developing? WS does fCO (Rome) in the summer. Surely there could be a summer YVR-FCO.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeLRS View Post
Porter to open YVR base October 2024

What would such a new base entail? Hangars? More slots? A new terminal building of some sort?? Offices? What?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2024, 1:31 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
What would such a new base entail? Hangars? More slots? A new terminal building of some sort?? Offices? What?
I assume it's just a pilot base for now, rather than starting a new "hub"? So that means you can live in Vancouver and fly for Porter as a pilot. Just like how YWG for AC or YQT for PD.

So unless their business plan changed, PD will still only fly to YYZ, YOW, YUL, YHU from YVR...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2024, 3:01 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
...........


......Also, for ZRH AC now codeshare with WK, so it's a confirmation that they just transfer the route to their *A partner. Maybe next summer LX will take over the service and/or turn it to year-round?
Swiss International Airlines.... year round to Zurich. That would be another feather in YVR's cap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2024, 3:43 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
There is another free slot out of YVR for S24 - the other 3x weekly on the days when PVG not operating. But that time slot is too short and wouldn't work well with DXB. AC recently decide to put the slot toward KIX from May to mid-June. From mid-June onward is still undecided. It can either be additional frequency for KIX/DUB, or increase PVG to daily if they are allowed to, a new 3x weekly route, or do a big shuffle and move the slot over to YYZ/YUL (like last year with adding YUL-AMS). Either way, AC will have to decide on that by probably next Feb at the latest.
There, AC officially gave up on China for S24, and they just allocate the last frequency to KIX. YVR-KIX will now run 6x weekly from mid-June until the end of season. This is on top of the new YYZ-KIX route, which is likely using the frequency freed up from TLV.

So the following routes will rotate for S24 from June:
Late night: SIN x4, HKG x3
Mid-day: KIX x6, DUB x4, PVG x4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2024, 6:59 AM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
I assume it's just a pilot base for now, rather than starting a new "hub"? So that means you can live in Vancouver and fly for Porter as a pilot. Just like how YWG for AC or YQT for PD.

So unless their business plan changed, PD will still only fly to YYZ, YOW, YUL, YHU from YVR...
Per other places reporting this (though still no sources), it will be for pilots AND for cabin crew.
http://www.avcanada.ca/forums2/viewtopic.php?t=210044
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2024, 8:14 AM
thenoflyzone thenoflyzone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
With this latest AF boost I wanted to check in on S24 Vs S19 Europe capacity again.

To no one's surprise AC is the only major airline at YVR to have a decline in European seat capacity at YVR. The only other airline with a decline is Icelandair.



I always understood the Europe flights to be popular subcontinent flights too. With the AC Delhi flight gone and connections through China gone, one would think there would be a boost to seats to Europe. Apparently not according to AC. BA and AF/KLM seem to be happy to jump in and steal PAX, as are Westjet through YYC im sure.

Pretty disappointing attention AC are paying to their 3rd 'hub'.
I understand your frustration, but a few things to consider.

1. AC wants you to take their subcontinent flights from YYZ/YUL, not FRA/MUC/ZRH or VIE. This way they dont have to share the revenue with LH Group. The A++ JV is only applicable between Europe and North America, so on AC's non stops to India, they don't need to share anything. knowing this, if you were AC, what flights would you push on your customers?

2. TATL traffic to Europe is the most lucrative air market in the world at the moment. Period. YVR's position in North America, and relatively weaker O&D to Europe compared to YYZ/YUL, means it's not well placed to capture the growth we are seeing in that market. Also, WS's significant seat capacity on YYC-Europe in the summer negatively affects YVR-Europe. There is no denying that. AC's widebody shortage is also a factor, as nname said.

3. I think AF would have added YVR regardless of what AC did on YVR-Europe. As for BA, considering historically they flew double daily B747s from LHR to YVR, I wouldn't call their current setup a significant increase in service. I've said this before.

4. I wouldn't call AC's additions at YVR in the last 2 years (BKK/SIN/DXB) disappointing. These are all alpha cities, and major destinations any North American airport would dream of having. In the case of BKK, you're the only one in NA that has it. That's something to be proud of, and it's all because of AC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeLRS View Post
Porter to open YVR base October 2024
Worth mentioning, it's for the E2 only, not the Q400s.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post

Remember, AC is still more than 20 widebody planes down from their peak in 2019. That's about 20 daily flights they need to cut across their hubs. YVR cut was about 5 daily for the summer, and a single daily during winter. Well within our share.
Is it that high? I don't think it's more than 20. Probably around 15 or so. They bought quite a few used A330s since 2019 and 2-3 B789s as well.

Also worth mentioning, some of those Rouge 767s were getting quite old. They couldn't have flown forever, and would have probably been close to retirement by now.

Last edited by thenoflyzone; Feb 9, 2024 at 8:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2024, 10:48 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenoflyzone View Post
Is it that high? I don't think it's more than 20. Probably around 15 or so. They bought quite a few used A330s since 2019 and 2-3 B789s as well.

Also worth mentioning, some of those Rouge 767s were getting quite old. They couldn't have flown forever, and would have probably been close to retirement by now.
OK, 21 down since 2020, or 20 assuming the last remaining 789 will join before summer begin. Or 16 if you include the ones that joined the fleet after S19 and before pandemic.

But no matter how you count it, losing 1 to 4.5* daily flights is still well within YVR's share. The biggest loser from AC is actually YYZ and YYC. YYZ, in particular, is still almost 1000 weekly flights down from S19...

* = I counted around 5 daily before the KIX increase. Now with the extra 2x weekly, it's closer to 4.5 than 5.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2024, 8:51 AM
hehehe hehehe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: YYC--> BNE
Posts: 1,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
With this latest AF boost I wanted to check in on S24 Vs S19 Europe capacity again.

To no one's surprise AC is the only major airline at YVR to have a decline in European seat capacity at YVR. The only other airline with a decline is Icelandair.



I always understood the Europe flights to be popular subcontinent flights too. With the AC Delhi flight gone and connections through China gone, one would think there would be a boost to seats to Europe. Apparently not according to AC. BA and AF/KLM seem to be happy to jump in and steal PAX, as are Westjet through YYC im sure.

Pretty disappointing attention AC are paying to their 3rd 'hub'.
I mean they're running an airline for a profit and not based on emotion, and YVR is a huge part of their strategy still. I don't really see why this is a big deal, same reason why AC drew back on YYC so much. AC has added SIN/DXB/Oceania increases and a lot of North American increases, so they are investing a lot at YVR.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2024, 4:14 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2024, 5:02 PM
Zmonkey Zmonkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by hehehe View Post
I mean they're running an airline for a profit and not based on emotion, and YVR is a huge part of their strategy still. I don't really see why this is a big deal, same reason why AC drew back on YYC so much. AC has added SIN/DXB/Oceania increases and a lot of North American increases, so they are investing a lot at YVR.
Air Canada also has 21 fewer Wide Body aircraft compared to 2019.
They need to get the XLR in before they can go back to pre covid frequencies and destinations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2024, 9:53 PM
zahav zahav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,052
I agree with what many others said, we have not made out that bad all things considered. The double whammy of Chinese flights dropping off and the Ukraine war blocking access to India for AC really crushed big segments of our market. And as others have also said, other airports suffered as well in their own way. Just looking at overall traffic isn't always the only story. Look at YYC. WS has really beefed up there, adding some real solid international flights, dominating domestic routes ex-YYC, and locking down transborder and leisure. But what people don't get when they see WS increasing YYC like crazy is the corresponding loss from other airlines. AC absolutely gutted their network there, across all sectors. Even before Covid, the random international airlines dropped off (British Airways, Hainan, Aeromexico, Lufthansa, am I missing any?). I am not saying this to bad mouth YYC or imply they are doing poorly. Rather just emphasizing that airports like YVR and YYC are seeing positives and negatives. WS building up their YYC fortress has boosted traffic all around, but it's come at the cost of basically every other airline there. So even though the loss of China is a huge issue for YVR, getting adds like BKK, SIN, DXB are fantastic, and a sign of confidence to experiment on such bold routes. Bringing back routes like DUB might be small, but it's a route that could easily be shelved, yet still operates (ditto with KIX). Then you have the great international carrier presence, which is stronger than ever (minus China), and an improvement over pre-Covid even (ex. Qantas finally going year round, adding Fiji Airways, adding Air India, Aeromexico going to 3x daily, Icelandair going year-round, both KL and AF operating 777-300s, LH still flying the 747). These might not be huge, but they are choices these airlines made when there were other options available. So any little bit is positive, especially for non-domestic airlines. International airlines have the whole world as potential candidates to devote resources, they don't have hubs in Canada like AC does, they have no allegiance or infrastructure anywhere but in their home airports (ie. LH in FRA and MUC). They fly where they make the most money, and don't stick around if a route is a dud. It's not personal, it's business. So keeping and attracting international carriers is a big coup, even if it doesn't make up for losing China or various AC routes in terms of pax, it is a positive endorsement.

PS, YVR.ca used to have a cool feature where you used a pulldown menu to show the connections process between various sectors (ie. Arriving From: International, Connecting to: US, and it would tell you exactly what to do (ie. do not enter customs hall, proceed to US connections, you will not pick up your bags, etc.). You could select which airline you were arriving on, which you were departing on, and it generated specific instructions for the chosen connection. It is not always clear when people do and do not collect bags between international connections, or when to clear customs if connecting to the US from international, when you exit a secured area and when you can connect within security, etc. And it has changed from years past, new facilities built, etc. So that tool was very helpful. They have a map now, but it has way less detail, and isn't as clear for people who aren't airport savvy. Very odd they got rid of it... Or maybe I am just blind and braindead, so if anyone else knows the feature I mean, and can find it, let me know
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2024, 12:42 AM
owenf owenf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
Nearly 25 million in 2023 - putting us at just shy of 95% of peak-2019 numbers. Will we top 2019 this year?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2024, 1:37 AM
hehehe hehehe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: YYC--> BNE
Posts: 1,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav View Post
I agree with what many others said, we have not made out that bad all things considered. The double whammy of Chinese flights dropping off and the Ukraine war blocking access to India for AC really crushed big segments of our market. And as others have also said, other airports suffered as well in their own way. Just looking at overall traffic isn't always the only story. Look at YYC. WS has really beefed up there, adding some real solid international flights, dominating domestic routes ex-YYC, and locking down transborder and leisure. But what people don't get when they see WS increasing YYC like crazy is the corresponding loss from other airlines. AC absolutely gutted their network there, across all sectors. Even before Covid, the random international airlines dropped off (British Airways, Hainan, Aeromexico, Lufthansa, am I missing any?). I am not saying this to bad mouth YYC or imply they are doing poorly. Rather just emphasizing that airports like YVR and YYC are seeing positives and negatives. WS building up their YYC fortress has boosted traffic all around, but it's come at the cost of basically every other airline there. So even though the loss of China is a huge issue for YVR, getting adds like BKK, SIN, DXB are fantastic, and a sign of confidence to experiment on such bold routes. Bringing back routes like DUB might be small, but it's a route that could easily be shelved, yet still operates (ditto with KIX). Then you have the great international carrier presence, which is stronger than ever (minus China), and an improvement over pre-Covid even (ex. Qantas finally going year round, adding Fiji Airways, adding Air India, Aeromexico going to 3x daily, Icelandair going year-round, both KL and AF operating 777-300s, LH still flying the 747). These might not be huge, but they are choices these airlines made when there were other options available. So any little bit is positive, especially for non-domestic airlines. International airlines have the whole world as potential candidates to devote resources, they don't have hubs in Canada like AC does, they have no allegiance or infrastructure anywhere but in their home airports (ie. LH in FRA and MUC). They fly where they make the most money, and don't stick around if a route is a dud. It's not personal, it's business. So keeping and attracting international carriers is a big coup, even if it doesn't make up for losing China or various AC routes in terms of pax, it is a positive endorsement.

PS, YVR.ca used to have a cool feature where you used a pulldown menu to show the connections process between various sectors (ie. Arriving From: International, Connecting to: US, and it would tell you exactly what to do (ie. do not enter customs hall, proceed to US connections, you will not pick up your bags, etc.). You could select which airline you were arriving on, which you were departing on, and it generated specific instructions for the chosen connection. It is not always clear when people do and do not collect bags between international connections, or when to clear customs if connecting to the US from international, when you exit a secured area and when you can connect within security, etc. And it has changed from years past, new facilities built, etc. So that tool was very helpful. They have a map now, but it has way less detail, and isn't as clear for people who aren't airport savvy. Very odd they got rid of it... Or maybe I am just blind and braindead, so if anyone else knows the feature I mean, and can find it, let me know
Exactly, YVR is still doing incredibly well. A minor correction but LH wasn't at YYC pre pandemic ( I guess with Discover airlines now at 12x weekly March 31-End of October, plus Condor it's still a capacity boost on YYC-FRA). But otherwise yeah both YVR and YYC are doing fairly well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:07 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.