HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2017, 6:07 PM
SteveP SteveP is offline
Reach for the heavens
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,310
Doesn't look like Shaw Court to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by X_ting_on View Post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2017, 8:33 PM
Habanero's Avatar
Habanero Habanero is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dynamic city near the Rockies
Posts: 2,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by dg66 View Post
It says 1000 units, you sure that the right project?
Says 400 units and 32 floors tall. Looks decent enough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2017, 9:27 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Government's condo regulation survey. This one deserves being shared far and wide!
https://extranet.gov.ab.ca/opinio6/s?s=37639
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2017, 10:48 PM
dg66 dg66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habanero View Post
Says 400 units and 32 floors tall. Looks decent enough.
Definitely said 1000 when I looked at it. Whatever, it's 400 is good also.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2017, 11:15 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveP View Post
Doesn't look like Shaw Court to me.
Yes it does.
https://www.google.ca/maps/@51.0506329,-...xH6_thizUcC39Sg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Nov 7, 2017, 5:21 PM
Tarsus's Avatar
Tarsus Tarsus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,062
Someone put a lot of time and effort into this, hopefully they are being paid by Shaw.
Quote:
Originally Posted by X_ting_on View Post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Nov 7, 2017, 10:19 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 25,965
TallBob and Craner will like this:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=228432
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Nov 7, 2017, 11:12 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Someone I know in greater Vancouver has half of their basement as a legal secondary suite, and the other half still used by the home's owners. There are two outside doors in the walk-out basement, one from the half still accessible to the owners, and a second from the suite. The two areas in the basement are connected via the utility room IE each half has a door to it (both with keyed locks, of course). Clearly the home has a substantial footprint, as both halves are quite reasonable (I'm thinking it is about 700+sf per half, plus 100sf for the utility room, so about 1,500-1,600sf on the floor I'm thinking). Is this scenario allowed in Calgary? I don't recall ever seeing a SFH with a door exiting from the basement on both sides of the house.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2017, 6:25 PM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
O-tacular: I saw that over on the Denver site.... Nice!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2017, 8:05 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
Thanks O-tac - good for Denver .... But I wish we could get something that tall built here (surprise surprise).
I'm not a fan of the design though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2017, 8:21 PM
Chinook Arch's Avatar
Chinook Arch Chinook Arch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,506
Tall Bob and Craner both responding to O-Tacular's post.......

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2017, 9:06 PM
ST1 ST1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chinook Arch View Post
Tall Bob and Craner both responding to O-Tacular's post.......

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2017, 12:51 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,375

Guess we'll keep everyone speculating.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2017, 4:29 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
^^Until the office market rebounds....It'll be a while a while! I'm encouraged to see a few fairly tall proposals (residential) out there, which is a positive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2017, 4:19 PM
Bad Grizzly's Avatar
Bad Grizzly Bad Grizzly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,178
Ever notice how posts by Craner are always followed by a post from Tall Bob or vice versa?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2017, 4:47 PM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
I haven't been around for over a year....I didn't realize I was missed this much....LOL!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2017, 12:17 AM
Rollerstud98 Rollerstud98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,820
NIMBYism banging on the door out here in Airdrie.

https://www.discoverairdrie.com/local/18...blic-hearing-on-309-main-street-rezoning

Property in article:
https://www.google.ca/maps/@51.293778,-1...6B-sB53v7OiCKulrtFnGg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

What it is surrounded by:

https://www.google.ca/maps/@51.293778,-1...6B-sB53v7OiCKulrtFnGg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
https://www.google.ca/maps/@51.293778,-1...6B-sB53v7OiCKulrtFnGg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

All commercial to the east and south really. There is no historic character in the area as I don't think any residents are older than the 70's even. Even houses here in town with some possible historic significance are just standard of the time nothing special houses. The first doctor the town had, his first house has already been torn down along with most everything else. All of these possibly historically significant houses are located in "The Village" and not old town though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2017, 9:10 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
You guys should spend more time in the States these days....Everybody's pissed off at everybody else.... I know, wrong thread!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2017, 3:53 PM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,084
^ That's right, wrong thread.

Time to get back to talking about construction.

Last edited by itom 987; Nov 12, 2017 at 5:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2017, 6:42 PM
PiGuy's Avatar
PiGuy PiGuy is offline
3.14159265
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 105
Great info there, thanks for sharing. I'm surprised another large condo is looking to go ahead in this market - I thought we were already fairly overbuilt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Sky View Post
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:16 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.