Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext
What struck me about Delirium's excellent shots is how new Vancouver is. Almost nothing (other than the Hotel Georgia) appeared to be over 40 years old. I'm glad the old hotel was saved, too bad we lost Hotel Vancouver II as a counterpoint.
|

....
whew! ...... sorry? We lost the Hotel Vancouver II as a counterpoint? Are you referring to the ORIGINAL, first-built Hotel Vancouver, or the "newer" one on Georgia and Burrard?
.... I was afraid they had knocked THAT one (the present one) down, because that
IS HV II. Maybe you mean the Hotel Vancouver I. Am I correct?
Personally, although I know it was old, and very much a heritage building, the former Hotel Vancouver (in pictures only) always had a "clumsiness" about the way it looked. I think the current Hotel Vancouver is sleeker, if you can call it that.
What really peeved me off was the demolition of the Birk's Building, only to be replaced by a rather charmless tower, and a giant drug store underneath. Keeping the Birk's Building (and redoing the inside) would have kept some Edwardian heritage to the area.
Until fairly recently, in Vancouver "old" =
BAD, "new" =
GOOD. There were plans to demolish Christ Church Cathedral several decades back, and replace it with a geometric Arthur Erickson creation. (... and Jesus wept.)