HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 8:49 AM
TonyAnderson's Avatar
TonyAnderson TonyAnderson is offline
.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Salt Lake City | Utah
Posts: 2,788
Utah will pass Kansas, Arkansas, and Mississippi by 2015 probably. And Iowa shortly after...passing 4 states total by next census.
__________________
Instagram | Twitter

www.UtahProjects.info
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 1:32 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
Damn, Wisconsin grew by more residents than Illinois?

It must be the Packers...

You also see Indiana, Kansas, and Minnesota growing faster as well.

Indiana and Minnesota I can understand because they have very large and growing metros (Indianpolis and the Twin Cities), although I'm a bit more baffled by Wisconsin and Kansas. The better explanation, though, is that the bad economy, high taxes, and the pension issue are really holding down Illinois right now.
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 3:53 PM
Unity77 Unity77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Damn, Wisconsin grew by more residents than Illinois?

It must be the Packers...

You also see Indiana, Kansas, and Minnesota growing faster as well.

Indiana and Minnesota I can understand because they have very large and growing metros (Indianpolis and the Twin Cities), although I'm a bit more baffled by Wisconsin and Kansas. The better explanation, though, is that the bad economy, high taxes, and the pension issue are really holding down Illinois right now.
A lot of Wisconsin's growth is occurring in its western counties such as Pierce and St. Croix, which are part of the MPLS - STPL metro area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2012, 11:08 PM
SPonteK SPonteK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
although I'm a bit more baffled by Wisconsin and Kansas.
Kansas' growth is almost exclusively NE Kansas, along the I-70 corridor from Manhattan to KC, and that growth is heavily concentrated in Johnson County and the KC exurbs.

To a lesser degree (by a couple orders of magnitude) metro Wichita is also growing.

Which is to say the Kansas growth is largely fueled by the westernmost Missouri metro.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 8:04 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,924
We can disagree.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 8:55 PM
unusualfire unusualfire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cincinnati,OH San Diego,CA Alamosa, CO
Posts: 2,031
What is he saying? The plants should have closed? Plants did close in Ohio. The auto bail out has been paid back. GM has 10,000 workers in Ohio out of over 5.6 million jobs. It not like what benefits Ohio only benefits Ohio.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 9:11 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by unusualfire View Post
What is he saying? The plants should have closed? Plants did close in Ohio. The auto bail out has been paid back. GM has 10,000 workers in Ohio out of over 5.6 million jobs. It not like what benefits Ohio only benefits Ohio.
How many workers does Chrysler have in Ohio?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 9:34 PM
unusualfire unusualfire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cincinnati,OH San Diego,CA Alamosa, CO
Posts: 2,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evergrey View Post
How many workers does Chrysler have in Ohio?
One plant and it has under 1000 workers in Twinsburg.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 10:31 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 34,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by unusualfire View Post
What is he saying? The plants should have closed? Plants did close in Ohio. The auto bail out has been paid back. GM has 10,000 workers in Ohio out of over 5.6 million jobs. It not like what benefits Ohio only benefits Ohio.
The vast majority of auto industry jobs aren't with the Big Three.

If Ohio has 10,000 GM workers, it probably has at least 50,000 auto parts supplier jobs, auto engieers, and the like. Cars have huge, huge job multiplier effects.

I don't think it's outlandish to say that the auto bailout had a positive impact in states with a heavy auto manufacturing presence.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 2, 2013, 5:03 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Pass me the Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 50,876
Aye oh, where to go, Ohio.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2013, 2:39 PM
installers installers is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 14
Hah wow! It's a great achievement to get a country that populated that quickly.
Canada which is one of the stronger countries in greater America doesn't even have those signs of mass population improvement. Cheers to the neighbors south of the border
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2013, 2:45 PM
min-chi-cbus min-chi-cbus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by installers View Post
Hah wow! It's a great achievement to get a country that populated that quickly.
Canada which is one of the stronger countries in greater America doesn't even have those signs of mass population improvement. Cheers to the neighbors south of the border
Yeah I'm kind of surprised Canada isn't growing more quickly....especially since most of its big cities aren't brutally cold, or at least colder than Chicago, NYC or Minneapolis. And with the boom (and possibly, bubble) in housing I figured population was part of the driver there.....but it sounds like not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2013, 7:40 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Pass me the Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 50,876
Canada's immigration intake (per capita) ranks amongst the most highest. It is our natural rate of population which is low; below replacement level.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...migration_rate
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 4:39 AM
Urbanguy's Avatar
Urbanguy Urbanguy is offline
Go Beavs! Go Niners!
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland | Honolulu
Posts: 6,198
Here's the latest population estimates for Race & Hispanic or Latino origins as of July 1, 2012 according to the US Census & their growth since the official census count was done in April 2010.

Hispanic or Latino (of any race)
United States: 53,027,708 ( 2,550,114 )
Alabama: 196,032 ( 10,430 )
Alaska: 44,869 ( 5,620 )
Arizona: 1,976,106 ( 80,957 )
Arkansas: 199,693 ( 13,643 )
California: 14,537,666 ( 523,947 )
Colorado: 1,088,744 ( 50,057 )
Connecticut: 510,645 ( 31,558 )
Delaware: 78,813 ( 5,592 )
District of Columbia: 62,726 ( 7,977 )
Florida: 4,484,199 ( 260,393 )
Georgia: 909,902 ( 56,213 )
Hawaii: 131,744 ( 10,902 )
Idaho: 185,160 ( 9,259 )
Illinois: 2,101,208 ( 73,630 )
Indiana: 412,609 ( 22,902 )
Iowa: 162,894 ( 11,350 )
Kansas: 317,061 ( 17,019 )
Kentucky: 142,028 ( 9,192 )
Louisiana: 208,325 ( 15,765 )
Maine: 18,599 ( 1,664 )
Maryland: 512,010 ( 41,378 )
Massachusetts: 674,073 ( 46,419 )
Michigan: 456,330 ( 19,972 )
Minnesota: 264,359 ( 14,101 )
Mississippi: 85,260 ( 3,779 )
Missouri: 225,314 ( 12,844 )
Montana: 31,552 ( 2,987 )
Nebraska: 179,970 ( 12,565 )
Nevada: 752,049 ( 35,548 )
New Hampshire: 40,042 ( 3,338 )
New Jersey: 1,641,398 ( 86,254 )
New Mexico: 979,722 ( 26,319 )
New York: 3,552,781 ( 135,859 )
North Carolina: 850,853 ( 50,733 )
North Dakota: 17,230 ( 3,763 )
Ohio: 377,119 ( 22,445 )
Oklahoma: 356,300 ( 24,293 )
Oregon: 474,157 ( 24,095 )
Pennsylvania: 781,202 ( 61,542 )
Rhode Island: 138,549 ( 7,894 )
South Carolina: 249,712 ( 14,030 )
South Dakota: 25,715 ( 3,596 )
Tennessee: 312,732 ( 22,673 )
Texas: 9,960,900 ( 499,979 )
Utah: 379,436 ( 21,096 )
Vermont: 10,057 ( 849 )
Virginia: 687,496 ( 55,671 )
Washington: 807,599 ( 51,809 )
West Virginia: 24,530 ( 2,262 )
Wisconsin: 355,468 ( 19,412 )
Wyoming: 54,770 ( 4,539 )

White alone (includes Hispanic White)
United States: 244,495,567 ( 2,558,506 )
Alabama: 3,373,844 ( 10,967 )
Alaska: 493,430 ( 9,557 )
Arizona: 5,522,144 ( 103,661 )
Arkansas: 2,359,569 ( 17,166 )
California: 28,033,826 ( 397,423 )
Colorado: 4,572,022 ( 121,399 )
Connecticut: 2,942,335 ( -8,485 )
Delaware: 654,352 ( 8,582 )
District of Columbia: 271,323 ( 20,058 )
Florida: 15,120,082 ( 311,215 )
Georgia: 6,231,978 ( 87,047 )
Hawaii: 363,544 ( 14,493 )
Idaho: 1,497,404 ( 21,307 )
Illinois: 10,028,832 ( -1,755 )
Indiana: 5,659,668 ( 20,835 )
Iowa: 2,851,533 ( 11,918 )
Kansas: 2,517,663 ( 16,606 )
Kentucky: 3,882,987 ( 18,794 )
Louisiana: 2,930,137 ( 27,262 )
Maine: 1,266,849 ( -2,915 )
Maryland: 3,579,276 ( 37,897 )
Massachusetts: 5,560,222 ( 35,285 )
Michigan: 7,920,263 ( -29,234 )
Minnesota: 4,654,134 ( 30,673 )
Mississippi: 1,788,664 ( -727 )
Missouri: 5,049,604 ( 11,197 )
Montana: 901,340 ( 9,811 )
Nebraska: 1,668,779 ( 19,515 )
Nevada: 2,128,047 ( 21,553 )
New Hampshire: 1,247,076 ( -1,245 )
New Jersey: 6,538,430 ( -8,068 )
New Mexico: 1,735,255 ( 14,263 )
New York: 13,930,819 ( 29,158 )
North Carolina: 7,013,116 ( 114,820 )
North Dakota: 630,215 ( 21,079 )
Ohio: 9,630,901 ( -33,623 )
Oklahoma: 2,881,880 ( 30,370 )
Oregon: 3,444,767 ( 41,515 )
Pennsylvania: 10,655,948 ( -7,826 )
Rhode Island: 902,439 ( -7,814 )
South Carolina: 3,229,346 ( 65,203 )
South Dakota: 718,352 ( 11,662 )
Tennessee: 5,117,456 ( 61,145 )
Texas: 21,001,450 ( 611,657 )
Utah: 2,620,788 ( 73,459 )
Vermont: 597,050 ( -1,542 )
Virginia: 5,818,810 ( 93,378 )
Washington: 5,625,335 ( 90,073 )
West Virginia: 1,743,721 ( -2,792 )
Wisconsin: 5,052,112 ( 15,189 )
Wyoming: 536,450 ( 7,340 )

Black or African American alone
United States: 41,204,793 ( 954,158 )
Alabama: 1,279,805 ( 20,581 )
Alaska: 27,373 ( 2,932 )
Arizona: 297,985 ( 17,080 )
Arkansas: 459,739 ( 5,718 )
California: 2,515,716 ( 29,167 )
Colorado: 225,390 ( 10,471 )
Connecticut: 401,496 ( 9,365 )
Delaware: 202,090 ( 5,809 )
District of Columbia: 316,482 ( 6,103 )
Florida: 3,206,350 ( 128,283 )
Georgia: 3,091,904 ( 97,977 )
Hawaii: 29,905 ( 7,432 )
Idaho: 12,037 ( 1,087 )
Illinois: 1,900,578 ( -2,880 )
Indiana: 616,199 ( 12,402 )
Iowa: 97,080 ( 5,385 )
Kansas: 178,820 ( 5,522 )
Kentucky: 354,119 ( 11,315 )
Louisiana: 1,491,433 ( 28,464 )
Maine: 17,603 ( 1,334 )
Maryland: 1,766,990 ( 35,477 )
Massachusetts: 525,799 ( 21,434 )
Michigan: 1,415,107 ( -960 )
Minnesota: 297,962 ( 17,013 )
Mississippi: 1,116,367 ( 13,266 )
Missouri: 706,079 ( 5,901 )
Montana: 5,679 ( 1,464 )
Nebraska: 88,758 ( 2,787 )
Nevada: 244,462 ( 13,238 )
New Hampshire: 18,374 ( 2,009 )
New Jersey: 1,298,879 ( 16,874 )
New Mexico: 51,087 ( 2,081 )
New York: 3,422,914 ( 44,867 )
North Carolina: 2,147,599 ( 59,237 )
North Dakota: 10,547 ( 2,299 )
Ohio: 1,439,598 ( 12,737 )
Oklahoma: 291,551 ( 7,219 )
Oregon: 77,564 ( 3,150 )
Pennsylvania: 1,456,977 ( 25,151 )
Rhode Island: 77,123 ( 2,050 )
South Carolina: 1,322,528 ( 19,663 )
South Dakota: 13,939 ( 3,406 )
Tennessee: 1,097,978 ( 29,968 )
Texas: 3,216,242 ( 145,802 )
Utah: 36,717 ( 2,853 )
Vermont: 6,879 ( 423 )
Virginia: 1,612,713 ( 33,299 )
Washington: 268,660 ( 16,327 )
West Virginia: 65,787 ( 1,902 )
Wisconsin: 373,275 ( 6,254 )
Wyoming: 8,555 ( 3,420 )

American Indian and Alaska Native alone
United States: 3,857,495 ( 117,989 )
Alabama: 33,579 ( 676 )
Alaska: 108,249 ( 1,981 )
Arizona: 345,622 ( 10,344 )
Arkansas: 27,647 ( 1,513 )
California: 639,740 ( 17,633 )
Colorado: 81,688 ( 3,544 )
Connecticut: 17,688 ( 954 )
Delaware: 6,161 ( 232 )
District of Columbia: 3,488 ( 224 )
Florida: 95,218 ( 6,099 )
Georgia: 50,539 ( 1,940 )
Hawaii: 5,507 ( 547 )
Idaho: 26,684 ( 902 )
Illinois: 75,948 ( 2,102 )
Indiana: 25,494 ( 1,007 )
Iowa: 14,179 ( 616 )
Kansas: 33,909 ( 865 )
Kentucky: 12,429 ( 324 )
Louisiana: 34,249 ( 1,212 )
Maine: 8,859 ( 88 )
Maryland: 32,275 ( 1,390 )
Massachusetts: 31,172 ( 1,228 )
Michigan: 69,751 ( 1,355 )
Minnesota: 68,961 ( 1,636 )
Mississippi: 17,501 ( 664 )
Missouri: 31,631 ( 1,036 )
Montana: 65,164 ( 1,669 )
Nebraska: 24,281 ( 863 )
Nevada: 44,571 ( 1,606 )
New Hampshire: 3,633 ( 103 )
New Jersey: 52,255 ( 2,348 )
New Mexico: 213,081 ( 4,191 )
New York: 186,613 ( 3,567 )
North Carolina: 150,965 ( 3,399 )
North Dakota: 38,283 ( 1,335 )
Ohio: 30,606 ( 932 )
Oklahoma: 341,844 ( 6,180 )
Oregon: 68,955 ( 2,171 )
Pennsylvania: 41,680 ( 1,945 )
Rhode Island: 9,358 ( 185 )
South Carolina: 25,254 ( 589 )
South Dakota: 74,223 ( 1,441 )
Tennessee: 27,247 ( 991 )
Texas: 265,563 ( 14,354 )
Utah: 42,049 ( 1,320 )
Vermont: 2,280 ( -28 )
Virginia: 43,768 ( 2,243 )
Washington: 126,526 ( 3,877 )
West Virginia: 4,104 ( 129 )
Wisconsin: 62,021 ( 1,921 )
Wyoming: 15,003 ( 546 )

Asian alone
United States: 16,145,821 ( 986,305 )
Alabama: 59,602 ( 4,362 )
Alaska: 41,986 ( 3,104 )
Arizona: 204,840 ( 16,384 )
Arkansas: 41,338 ( 3,801 )
California: 5,294,255 ( 256,132 )
Colorado: 155,031 ( 10,212 )
Connecticut: 150,529 ( 10,013 )
Delaware: 32,141 ( 2,799 )
District of Columbia: 24,034 ( 2,329 )
Florida: 511,960 ( 37,761 )
Georgia: 351,734 ( 28,275 )
Hawaii: 532,599 ( 966 )
Idaho: 21,899 ( 1,865 )
Illinois: 638,108 ( 33,709 )
Indiana: 116,029 ( 10,494 )
Iowa: 60,004 ( 5,772 )
Kansas: 74,598 ( 4,970 )
Kentucky: 55,336 ( 5,159 )
Louisiana: 77,252 ( 5,423 )
Maine: 14,810 ( 1,027 )
Maryland: 352,347 ( 25,692 )
Massachusetts: 387,770 ( 28,097 )
Michigan: 259,806 ( 16,744 )
Minnesota: 235,120 ( 17,328 )
Mississippi: 28,255 ( 1,778 )
Missouri: 107,092 ( 6,879 )
Montana: 7,315 ( 936 )
Nebraska: 36,467 ( 3,145 )
Nevada: 217,264 ( 13,786 )
New Hampshire: 31,126 ( 2,193 )
New Jersey: 794,923 ( 48,711 )
New Mexico: 33,665 ( 2,412 )
New York: 1,566,191 ( 84,636 )
North Carolina: 238,933 ( 22,981 )
North Dakota: 7,840 ( 808 )
Ohio: 210,865 ( 14,172 )
Oklahoma: 72,539 ( 5,413 )
Oregon: 156,077 ( 11,068 )
Pennsylvania: 383,917 ( 25,722 )
Rhode Island: 33,852 ( 2,084 )
South Carolina: 67,529 ( 6,282 )
South Dakota: 9,005 ( 1,230 )
Tennessee: 102,862 ( 8,965 )
Texas: 1,095,443 ( 94,970 )
Utah: 63,857 ( 6,057 )
Vermont: 8,912 ( 843 )
Virginia: 487,505 ( 38,356 )
Washington: 531,395 ( 39,710 )
West Virginia: 13,796 ( 1,159 )
Wisconsin: 140,885 ( 9,057 )
Wyoming: 5,183 ( 534 )

Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone
United States: 707,228 ( 32,603 )
Alabama: 5,270 ( 62 )
Alaska: 8,558 ( 896 )
Arizona: 16,922 ( 810 )
Arkansas: 7,495 ( 810 )
California: 187,855 ( 6,424 )
Colorado: 9,231 ( 811 )
Connecticut: 3,641 ( 150 )
Delaware: 766 ( 76 )
District of Columbia: 1,131 ( 361 )
Florida: 20,454 ( 1,664 )
Georgia: 11,061 ( 607 )
Hawaii: 140,112 ( 1,820 )
Idaho: 2,916 ( 130 )
Illinois: 7,877 ( 441 )
Indiana: 3,769 ( 237 )
Iowa: 2,634 ( 215 )
Kansas: 2,953 ( 89 )
Kentucky: 3,441 ( 242 )
Louisiana: 2,781 ( 193 )
Maine: 513 ( 136 )
Maryland: 5,674 ( 283 )
Massachusetts: 6,304 ( 333 )
Michigan: 3,720 ( 278 )
Minnesota: 3,206 ( 248 )
Mississippi: 1,715 ( 15 )
Missouri: 7,821 ( 643 )
Montana: 774 ( 40 )
Nebraska: 2,163 ( 102 )
Nevada: 20,121 ( 814 )
New Hampshire: 596 ( 64 )
New Jersey: 8,228 ( 497 )
New Mexico: 3,327 ( 195 )
New York: 25,101 ( 1,101 )
North Carolina: 10,834 ( 525 )
North Dakota: 475 ( 141 )
Ohio: 5,597 ( 261 )
Oklahoma: 5,976 ( 622 )
Oregon: 15,848 ( 1,199 )
Pennsylvania: 7,723 ( 608 )
Rhode Island: 1,648 ( 46 )
South Carolina: 4,104 ( 147 )
South Dakota: 608 ( 91 )
Tennessee: 5,788 ( 362 )
Texas: 33,980 ( 2,738 )
Utah: 27,563 ( 1,514 )
Vermont: 203 ( 28 )
Virginia: 8,830 ( 629 )
Washington: 46,143 ( 2,638 )
West Virginia: 563 ( 78 )
Wisconsin: 2,640 ( 135 )
Wyoming: 575 ( 54 )

Two or More Races
United States: 7,503,136 ( 518,941 )
Alabama: 69,923 ( 5,639 )
Alaska: 51,853 ( 2,748 )
Arizona: 165,742 ( 12,959 )
Arkansas: 53,343 ( 4,205 )
California: 1,370,038 ( 80,695 )
Colorado: 144,220 ( 11,949 )
Connecticut: 74,658 ( 4,253 )
Delaware: 21,582 ( 1,660 )
District of Columbia: 15,865 ( 1,525 )
Florida: 363,504 ( 31,236 )
Georgia: 182,729 ( 16,446 )
Hawaii: 320,646 ( 6,754 )
Idaho: 34,788 ( 2,855 )
Illinois: 223,912 ( 13,006 )
Indiana: 116,175 ( 8,557 )
Iowa: 48,756 ( 3,925 )
Kansas: 77,962 ( 4,735 )
Kentucky: 72,103 ( 5,214 )
Louisiana: 66,041 ( 5,967 )
Maine: 20,558 ( 1,161 )
Maryland: 148,001 ( 10,272 )
Massachusetts: 134,877 ( 12,138 )
Michigan: 214,713 ( 11,537 )
Minnesota: 119,756 ( 8,316 )
Mississippi: 32,424 ( 2,633 )
Missouri: 119,761 ( 7,405 )
Montana: 24,869 ( 1,806 )
Nebraska: 35,077 ( 2,772 )
Nevada: 104,466 ( 7,383 )
New Hampshire: 19,913 ( 1,124 )
New Jersey: 171,875 ( 12,334 )
New Mexico: 49,123 ( 3,217 )
New York: 438,623 ( 28,830 )
North Carolina: 190,626 ( 15,628 )
North Dakota: 12,268 ( 1,375 )
Ohio: 226,658 ( 13,242 )
Oklahoma: 221,030 ( 13,665 )
Oregon: 136,142 ( 9,176 )
Pennsylvania: 217,291 ( 15,557 )
Rhode Island: 25,872 ( 1,174 )
South Carolina: 74,962 ( 6,475 )
South Dakota: 17,227 ( 1,344 )
Tennessee: 104,912 ( 8,707 )
Texas: 446,525 ( 44,121 )
Utah: 64,313 ( 6,199 )
Vermont: 10,687 ( 546 )
Virginia: 214,241 ( 16,938 )
Washington: 298,953 ( 19,847 )
West Virginia: 27,442 ( 1,943 )
Wisconsin: 95,465 ( 6,856 )
Wyoming: 10,646 ( 892 )
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 5:00 AM
Urbanguy's Avatar
Urbanguy Urbanguy is offline
Go Beavs! Go Niners!
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland | Honolulu
Posts: 6,198
Some highlights from the US Census:

Asians Fastest-Growing Race or Ethnic Group in 2012, Census Bureau

*The figures below include those that are part-Asian and are of growth between July 2011 & July 2012*

The U.S. Census Bureau announced Asians were the nation's fastest-growing race or ethnic group in 2012. Their population rose by 530,000, or 2.9 percent, in the preceding year, to 18.9 million, according to Census Bureau annual population estimates. More than 60 percent of this growth in the Asian population came from international migration.

By comparison, the Hispanic population grew by 2.2 percent, or more than 1.1 million, to just over 53 million in 2012. The Hispanic population growth was fueled primarily by natural increase (births minus deaths), which accounted for 76 percent of Hispanic population change. Hispanics remain our nation's second largest race or ethnic group (behind non-Hispanic whites), representing about 17 percent of the total population.

These statistics are part of a set of annual population estimates released today by race, Hispanic origin, age and sex. They examine population change for these groups nationally, as well as within all states and counties, between July 1, 2011, and July 1, 2012. Also released were population estimates for Puerto Rico and its municipios by age and sex.

"Asians and Hispanics have long been among our nation's fastest-growing race or ethnic groups," noted Thomas Mesenbourg, the Census Bureau's acting director.

Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders (climbing 2.2 percent to about 1.4 million), American Indians and Alaska Natives (rising 1.5 percent to a little over 6.3 million), and blacks or African-Americans (increasing 1.3 percent to 44.5 million) followed Asians and Hispanics in percentage growth rates.

Six More Counties Become Majority-Minority
The nation's total minority population increased by 1.9 percent and was 116 million, or 37 percent, of the total population in July 2012.
(The minority population includes people in any category other than non-Hispanic white alone.) More than 11 percent (353) of the nation's 3,143 counties were majority-minority as of July 1, 2012. Six of these counties became majority-minority populations since July 1, 2011: Mecklenburg, N.C. (Charlotte); Cherokee, Okla.; Texas, Okla.; Bell, Texas; Hockley, Texas; and Terrell, Texas.

The population of children younger than 5 is close to becoming majority-minority nationally, standing at 49.9 percent minority in 2012.

"The proportion of young children that is minority has been increasing since the 2010 Census and if this proportional growth continues, we expect that the crossover to majority-minority for this group will occur within the next couple of years," Mesenbourg said.

Nation Ages, But Some Parts Become Younger
The nation's median age climbed to 37.4 years in 2012, up from 37.3 one year earlier. There were some areas of the country, however, that became younger over the period. Six states experienced a decline in median age, led by North Dakota, where it fell by 0.5 years, from 36.6 to 36.1. The other states or equivalents with a drop in median age were Hawaii, Alaska, the District of Columbia, Kansas and Oklahoma. Likewise, median age declined for 382 counties, with Williams, N.D., experiencing the largest decrease, 1.7 years, from 36.6 to 34.9.

In 2012, there was a greater than 13-year difference between the states with the highest median age (Maine at 43.5) and lowest (Utah at 30.0). Among counties, the contrast is far more stark: about two generations. Sumter, Fla., with a median age of 64.8, stood at one extreme, and Madison, Idaho, at 23.0, was at the other. There were 53 counties where the median age was greater than 50, and 68 counties where it was less than 30.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 10:48 AM
tdawg's Avatar
tdawg tdawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Astoria, NY
Posts: 2,980
I don't think those figures are correct. If you add up Texas, you get something like 35 million, when the US Census estimate for the state in 2012 is 26 million.
__________________
From my head via my fingers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 11:45 AM
BevoLJ's Avatar
BevoLJ BevoLJ is offline
~Hook'em~
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Austin, TX/London, UK
Posts: 1,814
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdawg View Post
I don't think those figures are correct. If you add up Texas, you get something like 35 million, when the US Census estimate for the state in 2012 is 26 million.
The figures are correct. The white section included Hispanic white. So hispanic white are counted in two sections. The white and the hispanic/latino. You're probably looking for non-hispanic white.
__________________
Austin, Texas
London, United Kingdom
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 6:34 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
Looks like whites and blacks are bailing on Illinois (ie Chicagoland). The only ethnic groups that are contributing to population gains at this point are Hispanics and Asians
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 9:29 PM
Rail Claimore's Avatar
Rail Claimore Rail Claimore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Looks like whites and blacks are bailing on Illinois (ie Chicagoland). The only ethnic groups that are contributing to population gains at this point are Hispanics and Asians
California is pretty much in that same boat: the meager black population gain is probably due to momentum, and it wouldn't surprise me if we see decline by the next census.

I read an article a few months ago stating that even Hispanics are leaving California when taking only domestic migration into account and that the only reasons for growth are births and immigration (which has slowed down considerably). The big population boom there now is with Asians.
__________________
So am I supposed to sign something here?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2013, 2:56 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,168
Is Maine’s population too old and white to be sustainable?

Read More: http://bangordailynews.com/2013/06/1...e-sustainable/

Quote:
The number of annual deaths in Maine has eclipsed the number of births for the first time in recent history, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, and economists in the state fear the trend will shrink the work force and make doing business here more and more expensive.

- As its glut of baby boomers retire and die, fewer Mainers are born and grow up to replace them in the workplace. “My own forecast showed that this [natural decrease] would only happen in three or four years,” said Charles Colgan, chairman of the University of Southern Maine’s Muskie School of Public Service’s Community Planning and Development Program. “This is a serious issue for Maine. The population right now is concentrated in the 50-64 age group, and as that group moves into retirement years over the next decade, the vast bulk of people who will need to replace retiring baby boomers will have to come from outside of Maine, ” he said.

- Nationwide, the demographer said, America is still seeing a natural population increase — more births than deaths — but the gap is narrowing. Bolender said during the same 2011-2012 period in which Maine saw a natural decrease, the country as a whole saw its natural increase slow to just 1.4 million more births than deaths. That’s the latest low point in what’s been a steady decline since a 2006-07 high mark of nearly 1.9 million more births than deaths across the U.S. Where the shift seems to be most pronounced is among non-Hispanic whites, who as a demographic group experienced about 12,400 more deaths than births for the first time in 2011-2012.

- “We’ll see a big effect on schools,” he continued. “Schools will continue to close, we’ll see consolidation in K-12 administration. We’ll see more and more schools merging. To sustain a population in America today, you need schools and a hospital serving the area.” Maine’s population is still growing overall — the Census shows a July 2012 population of 1,329,921, up from 1,328,544 in 2011 and 1,327,585 in 2010 — due to the steady migration of new residents from out of state. But J. Scott Moody, economist and CEO of the conservative Maine Heritage Policy Center, said those incoming residents alone can’t be counted on to fill the workforce vacancies left behind by retiring baby boomers, born in the post-World War II era between 1946 and 1964.

- “Historical data and modeling suggest it will be very difficult for us to get in enough [immigrants] to replace the baby boom generation,” Colgan said. “Within the forecast horizon we can see pretty clearly, into the 2020s, there will be two issues. People simply won’t be able to find the workers at all … or in order to find the workers, they’ll have to recruit them from outside of Maine. That will increase the cost of hiring people. We’ll have to be much more competitive in how we compensate people.” Amanda Rector, Maine’s state economist, suggested in a population outlook report earlier this year that some businesses may simply avoid the state and set up shop where the population is more reliable.

.....
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:37 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.