HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


    B6 in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Vancouver Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2018, 5:15 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
A lesson on how to write gibberish and not write anything meaningful. Do the math.

76,000 square feet demolished
530,000 square feet built
No you misunderstood. He meant that those existing tenants, who are being evicted are now trying to find space in an already tight market
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2018, 11:12 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
No you misunderstood. He meant that those existing tenants, who are being evicted are now trying to find space in an already tight market
They've also been paying below market rates for years due to the demolition clause in their lease.

The tenants have know this was coming for years. It was their choice to stay and not relocate when the market was softer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2018, 6:12 AM
Nites Nites is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,558
I talked to the property management Bental-Kennedy and they said more than 75% of the building is empty now. Most tenants from my knowing have moved into adjacent buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2018, 9:18 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
A lesson on how to write gibberish and not write anything meaningful. Do the math.

76,000 square feet demolished
530,000 square feet built
Sure - but the 530,000 doesn't come online for 3 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2018, 4:10 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,804
Without the view cones could have been even more, which should be encouraged so close to a major train station in the heart of the CBD.

Even so still a nice decent sized addition.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2018, 8:58 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,048
Bentall really wants to launch this project, but to date have not yet found a launch tenant. i have no doubt they will though, this market is just insatiable right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2018, 9:22 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Bentall really wants to launch this project, but to date have not yet found a launch tenant. i have no doubt they will though, this market is just insatiable right now.
BK could be slightly late to the game in this cycle, but as they've been a participant in almost all past cycles, perhaps they may be willing to take a gamble at this point. I'm not sure if the specific BK fund/owner for 1090 has any pre-leasing restrictions it must adhere to, barring a special plea to the fund/owner.

Who knows... perhaps BK is first making back-channel efforts to pry Bentall Centre out from under from Anyang? Now wouldn't that make for interesting rumours! j/k
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2018, 6:29 AM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,870
I was walking by today and when I saw the address it rang a bell so I took a few pics.



July 10 '18, my pics






Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2018, 9:10 AM
Nites Nites is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,558
According to my sources tenants still have end of August to move out. I believe 85 percent have left already. Building will be demolished in November. I'm assuming September and October will be used to gut out the inside of the building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2018, 4:55 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Hey Mcminsen, were you taking the photo of the building around 7-ish yesterday? I saw a guy aim his camera real high up the building and I was thinking: "Must be a SSP-er hard at work".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2018, 5:33 PM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Hey Mcminsen, were you taking the photo of the building around 7-ish yesterday? I saw a guy aim his camera real high up the building and I was thinking: "Must be a SSP-er hard at work".


Nope. I don't do mornings or evenings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2018, 2:45 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,357
Haha. Neither was it me, so there must be at least three of us.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2018, 8:30 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Haha. Neither was it me, so there must be at least three of us.
Yeah! I know it's not Metro-One either. Well, I'm happy there are others concerned about this building and appreciate its architecture. Sad that it would be gone in a couple of years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2018, 10:59 PM
Nites Nites is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,558
It could be Yellow Fever.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 8:49 AM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,870
Nov.12 '18, my pics

































Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2018, 11:11 AM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcminsen View Post
Nov.12 '18, my pic


Here's the backside on the alley (Eveleigh Street). The parking structure is quite substantial.



Dec.25 '18, my pic
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2018, 11:29 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,048
Of all the buildings I'm sad to be losing downtown this would have to take the cake. I've always had a soft spot for this brutalist/formalist tower. Will be a shame to lose it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 5:18 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Of all the buildings I'm sad to be losing downtown this would have to take the cake. I've always had a soft spot for this brutalist/formalist tower. Will be a shame to lose it.
I agree, it's a pretty one. Not sure what the heritage protection process is like, or what nonprofits are involved or anything like that, but disappointing how it's turned out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 5:25 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,804
I have to echo this sentiment as well.

I remember admiring it about 10 years ago and thinking, “well it is decently large and seems to have some architectural heritage value to it, should be safe” Guess I was wrong.

The only saving grace is that at least it is being replaced with something decent (unlike the Landmark Tower).

But... I wish this new tower’s height was about 30 to 50 metres taller. The location and design seem to be calling for it.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2018, 5:25 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
i doubt many people would have fought for it. i do think it is worth saving architecture from these time periods, especially one that is this intricate. i am not in love with it, but it is very different and that i do like.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:05 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.