Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Wellsian
It's not just that our airport is close but so is our city. Denver is an extra hour of flight time and then you got to drive. Downtown SLC is just over 2 hours from Tacoma international. We are the closest non west coast city that can deliver on the requirements. The next closest is Denver and it would take double the time it would take to get to an HQ2 in SLC.
That's the biggest reason why Draper is a dumb idea for the Amazon RFP. It negates the one advantage that we have over the competition that none of them have any hope of matching.
|
I'm not sure that is the biggest reason Draper is a poor location. There are so many reasons it's hard to pick one as the worst.
Another plus about the drive to the airport is that there is hardly ever heavy congestion on that stretch of road. It's almost always between 8-12 minutes no matter what time of day it is. The route to Draper gets heavy congestion on a daily basis.
A proposal for SLC could be so slick if 400 S Main was the pick. So many advantages. So close to everything. Lots of transit access on site. It's on the grid, not in an awkward, undeveloped portion of the city right next to the freeway that has infrastructure deficiencies. They could have great, close panoramic views of the mountains. There is already tech office space planned for that area that Amazon could lease out. Scrounging up 25+ acres for starters, I think, is more than possible, if the right people get involved (CCRI, Holdings, County, Patrinely, possibly the Helds and the Garff family). It's really hard to imagine a reasonable person rationalizing picking the Draper site over 400 S Main.