Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin
Nope, I think what killed Granville Street are the large number of slums created above the retail spaces, and City policies that do not encourage its renewal. Craziness and all other nice social problems ensued in this neighbourhood, driving away businesses and visitors. Pedestrainized or not, it will never be what it was in the 30s to 60s. Just a sad sad street with hobos and drugs addicts wandering or loitering around.
This is exactly how East Hastings Street at the DTES was created in the first place.
We can target Davie Street next, but unfortunately it does not have too many beautiful higher-density heritage buildings to turn into slums.
|
Social problems are a two-fold problem of:
1) letting homeless/addicts to fend-for-themselves. Once someone is an addict they are willing to do anything to feed that addiction, and not just drugs, there's also gambling addicts who fall into the same trap.
2) people "I got mine" just turning a blind eye
This is why in some cities you see urban decay, and others you don't. The cities with urban decay are a result of trying to cram all the people nobody wants to care about into a tight space, and gradually encroach on it until they fight back.
And the solutions are simple, albeit, nobody wants to do it because it looks bad.
- put anyone unsheltered in a "shelter" that is basically a low-security prison.
- demolish all buildings not meeting fire/seismic building code
- mandatory occupancy of all buildings and suites within. If the owner is not living/working in the building, then they must hire someone to be available on-site 24/7 to resolve maintenance issues. Empty suites must be inspected daily for maintenance/security issues, and the power is not permitted to be disconnected for empty suites to prevent mold growth.
- All damage to fire-safety, electrical, plumbing or gas systems must be reported to the city, and subsequently inspected.
Many homeless people decline help because government "housing" is often worse than the disgusting SRO's they can't afford anyway.
As for the "free drugs" comments. As much as I hate the idea, I see why. The idea is to reduce the crimes caused by addicts, but it's not a solution. It's just another looking-the-other-way.