HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11161  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2018, 3:34 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
REM work ongoing at Mont-Royal station:


My pic
     
     
  #11162  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2018, 7:21 PM
333609543's Avatar
333609543 333609543 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 284
One reason I could possibly see for HSR studies and other related studies is the most efficient use of land purchase, but there comes a point where the studies themselves become more expensive than the most simple land purchasing plan. Other things such as potential ridership, build cost per km of track, and others remain relatively constant, (though high grade steel needed for rails can fluctuate in price, leading to larger discrepancies in prices for larger orders) Ridership is easy to predict with current volume of the proposed HSR routes (Windsor-London-Kitchener-Toronto;Toronto-Kingston-Ottawa;Toronto-Kingston-Montreal & Montreal-Quebec City) and some more local routes which would originate from these high speed rail stations as connections.

So you could expect a small-medium jump in ridership in short term after construction, with a small sustained rise in ridership as people veer away from short range airlines to travel to these cities (Security, Waiting for flight, Getting to Airport, Etc.) We should also as a nation avoid what Amtrak did with Acela Express, which is notoriously slow ( I haven't ridden on it however many friends & acquaintances have, it's also very expensive (in short: NOT world class). While we shouldn't aim to make Canada's potential HSR "world class", we should make sure it's in general: fast, efficient, relatively cheap, and ON TIME. Luckily the Quebec City-Windsor Corridor has some really great straight sections of track ROW or adjacent land that can be made straight-ish, leading to less speed reductions for sharp curves in rail that would require to reduce speed.

One thing that I think might work is a partnership with one of our allies to help create a HSR line in Canada (France, Germany, Japan come to mind). I would prefer Japan, Both France and Germany aren't actively looking to export their TGV/HSR technology since it's mostly used as a nationalised enterprise (this has some upsides). Japan IS however looking to export its Shinkansen technology which it already has to Taiwan and IIRC South Korea, so they have experience exporting transport products abroad (The UP Express uses Japanese manufactured locomotives/trains). The Japanese also want in on the North American HSR market (primarily the USA), so having a deal with JR and VIA Rail (or the Canadian & Japanese Governments) could be a win-win situation, Japan get's to showcase their technology to the North American market, and Canada gets exceptional HSR. JR Also runs as a private rail company, that wouldn't sit well with Canadians, and really wouldn't work in Canada but it can help us maintain a HSR line/system profitably (to help fund government programs, or for service improvements, extensions) or for it to break even while having gov't subsidies to keep prices very low.

JR has offered to build the first 50km (or miles) of a Maglev Line Between Washington DC and New York City fully out of their pocket to export their product, and the American market for HSR can be very valuable to foreign (but allied) countries.
     
     
  #11163  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2018, 2:42 PM
Reecemartin's Avatar
Reecemartin Reecemartin is offline
YouTube Creator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 1,776
First rail for the Valley Line has been laid: https://globalnews.ca/news/4380777/edmonton-valley-line-lrt-rail-installed-mill-woods/

Imo pretty exciting to see so much new rail transit being built from coast to coast!
     
     
  #11164  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2018, 4:08 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reecemartin View Post
First rail for the Valley Line has been laid: https://globalnews.ca/news/4380777/edmonton-valley-line-lrt-rail-installed-mill-woods/

Imo pretty exciting to see so much new rail transit being built from coast to coast!
Construction seems to be advancing quickly for that line.
     
     
  #11165  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2018, 10:58 AM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,220
Happy City St. John's (our civic engagement organization) did a study to determine which mode of transportation individual residents use more than half of the time. So here are the responses where one mode accounted for more than 50% of an individual's trips:



Even Downtown (mostly commercial core) and Centre City (generally the rowhouse areas like mine) have a lot of mainly drivers.

Keep in mind these numbers exclude anyone without a single transportation method exceeding 50%.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
     
     
  #11166  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2018, 9:48 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,354
Confederation Line.

Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
from last night....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hybrid247 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hybrid247 View Post
Looks like the installation of glass at Hurdman is approaching completion.





There are many more pictures at the following link: https://www.otrainfans.ca/blogs/snapshot-of-hurdman-and-lees
From various Twitter accounts.





https://twitter.com/_stevenli/status/1028100549747531776







https://twitter.com/Pika3323/status/1029744696833335296
     
     
  #11167  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2018, 10:31 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
Very exciting to see this one almost completed.
     
     
  #11168  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2018, 10:49 AM
srperrycgy's Avatar
srperrycgy srperrycgy is offline
I'm the bear on the right
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary (Killarney)
Posts: 1,669
Not bad Ottawa. Not bad at all.
__________________
Stevinder.
* * * * * *
     
     
  #11169  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2018, 6:40 PM
Reecemartin's Avatar
Reecemartin Reecemartin is offline
YouTube Creator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 1,776
So Montreal is getting some platform edge doors: https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-n...ing-anti-suicide-barriers-at-13-stations

I wonder if they will lead to more coming in across the country, I'd personally like to see it, systems that are outdoors could opt for gates rather than full height doors if necessary.
     
     
  #11170  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2018, 10:14 PM
p_xavier p_xavier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reecemartin View Post
So Montreal is getting some platform edge doors: https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-n...ing-anti-suicide-barriers-at-13-stations

I wonder if they will lead to more coming in across the country, I'd personally like to see it, systems that are outdoors could opt for gates rather than full height doors if necessary.
It was a prerequisite for the blue line extension as per STM's requirements. REM will have full height doors for all stations, including indoors.
     
     
  #11171  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2018, 11:33 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,578
Areas with mixed fleets are harder to install for. As for full height versus lower, it comes down to a physics problem. In systems where there air being pushed or pulled forward by a train exits through the station, having barriers too high (if they aren't at least semi permeable to air) can impact energy use and cause stress to the barriers themselves. Sealing off the platforms completely (if you want to heat or cool them) is even harder - you have to manage the air displaced by trains entirely without the benefit of the station volume.
     
     
  #11172  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2018, 12:17 AM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
Definitely at the very bottom of the list of things to spend money on, and impossible/pointless on all systems other than Van, Toronto and Montreal.
     
     
  #11173  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2018, 4:53 AM
Reecemartin's Avatar
Reecemartin Reecemartin is offline
YouTube Creator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 1,776
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
Definitely at the very bottom of the list of things to spend money on, and impossible/pointless on all systems other than Van, Toronto and Montreal.
Calgary and Edmonton use standard rolling stock, iirc when Edmonton gets their stuff together they could do it as they are using CBTC.

Of course its not worth doing vs. extensions but its a nice item to spend on if the government wants something quick to infuse cash into
     
     
  #11174  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2018, 8:46 AM
SaskOttaLoo SaskOttaLoo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 261
Edmonton Valley Line Capacity Issues

For anyone based in Edmonton, is this article an accurate description of the capacity issues there? The price tag of over $2B for that level of capacity and little possibility for expansion seems really questionable. After having so many issues with the metro line, it seems Edmonton really needs to get this one right.

https://globalnews.ca/news/4095116/edmonton-valley-line-lrt-capacity/

"Further scrutiny of the design specifications by Global News has revealed that once the first phase of the line is built in 2020, there may not be a chance for the city to increase passenger capacity or train frequency along the busy corridor. The line will eventually run to Lewis Farms in west Edmonton.

The train cars along the Valley Line extension will be 42 metres long, with the capacity to hold about 275 passengers. Due to the length of the cars compared to the length of a city block along the line, the Valley Line LRT trains will be limited to two cars per train, according to a city spokesperson. Adding an additional car to the train would block vehicle traffic.

The city is currently designing the Valley Line trains to run on a five-minute frequency, and any increase in train frequency could affect vehicle traffic, the spokesperson indicated.

To put this into perspective, this means the line will be able to transport a maximum of about 6,600 people over the course of an hour, based on a five-minute frequency.

By comparison, the current Capital Line is able to transport about 12,000 people – nearly twice as many people – per hour. This is because the 24-metre-long cars can accommodate about 200 people each, and the trains are able to carry up to five cars. Peak frequency on the Capital Line is also every five minutes.

Last week, a new city report revealed the cost of the Valley Line LRT jumped by about $440 million, from $1.8 billion to $2.24 billion. The increased price tag is due to design changes at a couple of key intersections, as well as a larger park-and-ride facility at Lewis Estates."
     
     
  #11175  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2018, 12:36 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reecemartin View Post
So Montreal is getting some platform edge doors: https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-n...ing-anti-suicide-barriers-at-13-stations

I wonder if they will lead to more coming in across the country, I'd personally like to see it, systems that are outdoors could opt for gates rather than full height doors if necessary.
What a waste of ressources. Montreal's #1 priority when it comes to station retrofits should be installing elevators and making them accessible.

But yes, if they are going to have this, the barriers should be 2/3 if possible. If it's full height, the platforms will feel enclosed.

As for Edmonton, those capacity issues are pretty bad, and predictable. How's a 13 km surface line come to the pretty much the same price as Ottawa's 12.5 km fully grade separated line (with 2.5 km downtown tunnel, 3 new subway stations, elaborate surface stations)? Yes, it's 5 years later, but that doesn't account fr such an inflation. And what's with the Valley line's one short section with the nice elevated station, while everything else runs on the surface?
     
     
  #11176  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2018, 12:42 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,848
The Confederation Line is definitely the mass transit project of the decade in Canada IMO given the impact it will have on reshaping transit in Ottawa / adding another city to Canada's metro system list (from 3 to 4).
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #11177  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2018, 2:00 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,809
I would argue that it's the best project so far in the 21st century in Canada - surpassing the Canada line.
     
     
  #11178  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2018, 2:06 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,848
The Evergreen Line was another well built project in Van, but obviously just being an addition to an existing network it doesn't have any where near the social / cultural impact that the Confederation Line will (also it doesn't run through the centre of a metro area).
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #11179  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2018, 2:22 PM
mistercorporate's Avatar
mistercorporate mistercorporate is offline
The Fruit of Discipline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,036
I'm so proud of all the transportation projects going up in Canada, how many countries with our population have so many highly developed cities. Spain maybe, but not much else!
__________________
MLS: Toronto FC
Canadian Premier League: York 9 FC
NBA: Raptors
     
     
  #11180  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2018, 2:35 PM
gunnar777 gunnar777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistercorporate View Post
I'm so proud of all the transportation projects going up in Canada, how many countries with our population have so many highly developed cities. Spain maybe, but not much else!
Australia (pop. 25 million)
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.