HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2018, 3:17 PM
Jayday23 Jayday23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
I voted in the advance poll yesterday. I was the only one there so it was fine, but the process required a 90 year old to find my name in a large binder, so I would assume more than 3 people would overwhelm the bandwidth.

If only there were some way to connect computers to a central database.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2018, 7:54 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 25,989
There was an advance poll in the Queen Juliana building up at the north end of Bronson that was open only to residents of the building. What the heck is up with that?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2018, 5:19 PM
CityTech CityTech is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,798
Watson announced that in his next term the tax target would increased to be 3%. Core services would continue to be held to 2% and the revenue from the extra % will go to "unexpected pressures" stemming from possible provincial budget cuts and to infrastructure maintenance/renewal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2018, 3:21 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,610
So Clive Doucet is on the radio this morning rambling on about his commuter rail (CR) plan. His story changed. Québec is no longer in the plan (though PoW will still be restored). If they want in, they deal with it. His map is just showing where the lines exist(ed). On the Ontario side, only Smiths Falls would be served outside Ottawa (what happened to Limoge?)

He then compares the cost of LRT vs BRT vs CR. He says LRT is 170m/km (true for Stage 1), BRT is 10m/km (Baseline which will be canceled to fund his CR) and CR he says 3m/km and then changes to 1m/ml, so for 50 miles (80km), that's 50 million apparently. Same as the O-Train (17 years ago! But he doesn't seem to realize costs would have gone up in 17 years).

Later, he goes on to talk about his plan to bring back weekly garbage pick-up. Again, he doesn't seem to think that will hurt the greenbin program. People won't be using it any less than they are now.

The guy has no concept of price and/or consequence.

Watson's a jack-ass, but at least he knows what he's doing.

https://www.facebook.com/CBCOttawa/v...72536219442325
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2018, 3:46 PM
m0nkyman m0nkyman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Watson's a jack-ass, but at least he knows what he's doing.
It's really sad that Watson is the only candidate with any business running for the position.
__________________
--Between build-and-run developers, budget-conscious planning departments, reactionary community associations and their city councillors, and the unaccountable OMB, we have more than enough bad actors sharing more than enough pathologies and perverse incentives.-David Reevely--
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2018, 3:52 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by m0nkyman View Post
It's really sad that Watson is the only candidate with any business running for the position.
Dewar would have been a solid choice if he hadn't fallen ill. Very unfortunate, not just for Ottawa of course, but for himself and his family.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2018, 11:18 PM
Norman Bates Norman Bates is offline
Living With My Mother
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Dewar would have been a solid choice if he hadn't fallen ill. Very unfortunate, not just for Ottawa of course, but for himself and his family.
Well said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2018, 8:51 PM
danishh danishh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 429
yeah, I looked at Doucet for a minute as a potential left-of-Watson protest vote, but it's really hard to justify voting for him with this disjointed and half-baked platform.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2018, 4:48 PM
CityTech CityTech is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,798
Here's something completely ridiculous about the city's failure to redraw ward boundaries in over a decade. In this new area of Barrhaven, the ward border between the urban and rural ward literally cuts across the neighbourhood resulting in some parts of the same cal-de-sac being in two different wards, one of which is centred on Richmond and North Gower (!)

https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/de...nity_Ward3.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2018, 5:04 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,610
Hopefully they do a better job at projecting into the future when they redraw the boundaries. Seems like a pretty easy thing to do.

I wouldn't mind sticking with the same amount of wards/councillors considering Ottawa's unique geographical size and mix or urban/suburban/rural areas, but the wards should be divided to encompass roughly the same population and not give rural wards more control over the rest of us.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 12:34 AM
11a2b3's Avatar
11a2b3 11a2b3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 255
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 4:27 AM
CityTech CityTech is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,798
It's a good thing for Watson that he got elected on a platform of raising his tax target to 3%. The new council is less Watson-friendly and more left-leaning overall (Taylor replaced with Kavanagh, Qadri with Glover, Chernushenko with Menard) and there'll probably be a lot more pushes from councillors for money for various things this time around.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 4:29 AM
danishh danishh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 429
incumbents out: qaqish, chernushenko, qadri

chernushenko's replacement menard shouldnt be much better for development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 12:17 PM
ars ars is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by danishh View Post
incumbents out: qaqish, chernushenko, qadri

chernushenko's replacement menard shouldnt be much better for development.
Sounds even worse actually, his remarks last night suggest that he's going to oppose Jim Watson in every way imaginable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 1:30 PM
zzptichka zzptichka is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 2,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by ars View Post
Sounds even worse actually, his remarks last night suggest that he's going to oppose Jim Watson in every way imaginable.
Should be fun. Some other candidates Jim supported have lost too: Kennery, Gourlay, Dransfield.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 1:40 PM
daud's Avatar
daud daud is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 762
Was disappointed to see Michael Qaqish go. Despite what a few people complained about, he was very active and very responsive to the community. While I don't know to what degree he influenced certain decisions, on his watch, we saw LRT approval extended into the community with the help of developers and he pushed up the bank and leitrim intersection construction to next year. He seemed to work a few files that involved getting developers to pitch in to speed up transportation projects.

He was a regular at all the community events and served Ward 22 well.

Carole Anne Meehan will be interesting to watch. She's lived in the community for a long time, has a very good background in civic issues being a broadcaster and news personality for so long. She also is talking transportation which is the major issue in ward 22. My only concern with her is that she may not be fully cognizant of just how many hours these councillors put in. So we'll see what happens but we were lucky in our ward as we had 3 really good candidates to choose from (Qaqish, Meehan, Singh)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 1:41 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by ars View Post
Sounds even worse actually, his remarks last night suggest that he's going to oppose Jim Watson in every way imaginable.
Yep, he definitely ran with the strongest anti-development rhetoric of the bunch. His most prominent recent accomplishment was leading the ultra- NIMBY protest of the new playing field at Immaculata High School, and getting more restrictions on the use of that field than any other field in the the city (which will almost certainly get overturned in court after we all pay a bunch of legal fees to defend them).

He was pretty much the worst option for Capital ward in terms of smart growth and intensification. I expect four years of him opposing every major development application, refusing to compromise, and then blaming suburban councillors when they get approved.

That said, there is hope that he will at least be a strong voice on transit. His free transit idea is a non-starter, but if he can get better funding/service improvements on the urban routes that drive all-day ridership, that will be something.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 1:43 PM
FutureWickedCity's Avatar
FutureWickedCity FutureWickedCity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 330
I think Chernushenko's defeat is unfortunate. He was a very thoughtful and reasonable politician. But it's also hard to argue with a Dewar endorsement...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 1:47 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 25,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by CityTech View Post
It's a good thing for Watson that he got elected on a platform of raising his tax target to 3%. The new council is less Watson-friendly and more left-leaning overall (Taylor replaced with Kavanagh, Qadri with Glover, Chernushenko with Menard) and there'll probably be a lot more pushes from councillors for money for various things this time around.
Was it even a blip in the campaign? Ottawans are inured to high taxes. Although I could see complaints if the additional money goes into things other than basic infrastructure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2018, 1:48 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 25,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by FutureWickedCity View Post
I think Chernushenko's defeat is unfortunate. He was a very thoughtful and reasonable politician. But it's also hard to argue with a Dewar endorsement...
I was surprised by Menard's win. I thought he was too far left to have broad appeal. Those silver spoon socialists in the Glebe can still surprise ...
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.