HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9701  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2014, 5:54 PM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
Great pic, thanks for sharing!

There is also a Frontier 320 in the background, likely a Laughlin or Wendover charter to take senior to the casino.

Also interesting the 777 takes out gates 62-64-66. That's a lot of real estate given up for the group E aircraft. Are the other gates that can handle group E or F aircraft without taking up 2-3 adjacent gates?
Just a short time before there was a AC 319 parked on 64 next to the 77W on the webcam, maybe its just a illusion of taking up the spots?
     
     
  #9702  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2014, 6:11 PM
CanadianCentaur's Avatar
CanadianCentaur CanadianCentaur is offline
Briareos Hecatonchires
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Big E
Posts: 3,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by LO 044 View Post
What class is a 757 and 767? And is the 777 in the picture a 200 or 300? I think there is a 10m difference in length between the two.
The AC 777 in that pic taken at YEG is a -300ER (Timetable code: 77W). And yes, there is a difference of over 10 m between the -200 and -300. Specifically, 63.7 m (209' 1") and 73.9 m (242' 4"), respectively.

An even longer variant, the 777-9X is planned with a length of 76.5 m (250' 11").
__________________
Edmonton/Amiskwacîwâskahikan Lat. 53° 34'N Elevation 671 m (2201 ft) Pop. 1,010,899 (2021 city) 1,418,118 (2021 metro) - North America's northernmost metro area over one million.
     
     
  #9703  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2014, 2:06 AM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,861
     
     
  #9704  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2014, 1:39 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
A sardine can in economy, my good friend flew it HKG-YVR about a week ago and has declared he is going back to Cathay for the next trip to HKG.
     
     
  #9705  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2014, 4:54 PM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
A sardine can in economy, my good friend flew it HKG-YVR about a week ago and has declared he is going back to Cathay for the next trip to HKG.
The older Air Canada 777 have 9 seats across. The newer ones are 10 across. Unfortunately the trend across many of the airlines is to more to 10 across seating on the newer 777. That gives you 17 inch wide seats.

In comparison, WestJet 737 also have 17 inch seating while Air Canada Airbus aircraft have 17.8 inch seats.

Air Canada announced a recently that over time they would be moving from the Airbus 320 series to the Boeing 737 series. Soon both WestJet and Airbus will have the slightly narrower seats all around.
     
     
  #9706  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2014, 4:06 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
New hotel looks ok, sadly the roof element was not designed in such a way to conceal the RTUs...

US departures is night and day now, although that massive hall post check-in is a bit odd.

Coming back early this am, customs and luggage was 20-25mins, even with 3 flights arriving at the same time... me thinks something hit the fan from that experience a couple of weeks ago.

Vegas still sucks
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #9707  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2014, 4:24 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
New hotel looks ok, sadly the roof element was not designed in such a way to conceal the RTUs...

US departures is night and day now, although that massive hall post check-in is a bit odd.

Coming back early this am, customs and luggage was 20-25mins, even with 3 flights arriving at the same time... me thinks something hit the fan from that experience a couple of weeks ago.

Vegas still sucks
That hall is odd, but I believe that is there for future expansion from the drawings. This was your first time through the US departures? I think the best thing are the new lounges, like the Premium Plaza options...feels like I'm back travelling in Asia were they have many locations. Nice way to start a flight.
     
     
  #9708  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2014, 4:28 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
^first time in the new fully complete hall, quite impressive.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #9709  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2014, 5:07 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,791
Yes the Hall was built to acomidate futre bridges.

After so many years witha poor cross border holding room this is quite a step up. Have not flown out yet but have been in the space a number of times now. (Using the super secret passages)
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
     
     
  #9710  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2014, 5:12 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,302
Yes, the first hall just prior to security on the US side is a bit odd but I think you're right in that it's to accommodate further expansion. There's room to add a couple more gates on the east side of the hammerhead, I believe, or IIRC, that's where future expansion (15-20 yrs) will adjoin the current building to a new one paralleling airport road. Speaking of the hammerhead/transborder gates, I love the new waiting area and even find the selection of food outlets to be quite adequate. Compare this to a few years ago... Yikes. I'll be going thru there once again in a couple months. Can't wait to escape this dreary/dirty winter.

Edit: oops, just saw airboy's post.
     
     
  #9711  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2014, 8:09 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
Foods good except for Wings... Wish they had a Belgium Brewery back there
     
     
  #9712  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2014, 9:32 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
We had nachos at Wings, they were very good.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #9713  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2014, 10:23 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
Leduc County lobby group to fight Edmonton annexation plan


BY GORDON KENT, EDMONTON JOURNAL


EDMONTON - A lobby group has been formed to fight Edmonton’s plan to annex 15,600 hectares of Leduc County.

The Leduc County Coalition, made up of business owners, land owners and county residents, wants to stop the annexation and force the city to work on a plan to benefit the entire region, according to a Monday news release.

“Annexing huge tracts of productive farmland, prime commercial and industrial land and our regional airport just isn’t right,” co-chair Clarence Shields says in the release.

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/edmo...onton+annexation+plan/9382232/story.html
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #9714  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 1:14 AM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
"our regional airport just isn’t right,” co-chair Clarence Shields says in the release"

What an idiot...their regional airport?
     
     
  #9715  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 1:19 AM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,302
I didn't realize Leduc had a regional airport. Since they're busy protecting that one, then Edmonton should get to annex the International. Besides, I'm not sure Leduc International would be as successful without the million people to the north of it using the facility. Give $$$ where it's due, FFS.
     
     
  #9716  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 2:43 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,893
Anyone see the Icelandair ad on TV? It ran during CTV News at 6, not sure about the other channels. Will keep an eye on Youtube for it.
     
     
  #9717  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 2:15 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
I was quite surprised to see that Icelandair doesn't fly to Dublin, was looking at flight options to go to a wedding in Ireland summer '15 and hoped to do a few days in Iceland on the way with the family (using the YEG flight).

I guess it will be BA and the 787 from YYC for us (of course the avgeek in me is pretty excited about that).
     
     
  #9718  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 2:17 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Leduc County lobby group to fight Edmonton annexation plan


BY GORDON KENT, EDMONTON JOURNAL


EDMONTON - A lobby group has been formed to fight Edmonton’s plan to annex 15,600 hectares of Leduc County.

The Leduc County Coalition, made up of business owners, land owners and county residents, wants to stop the annexation and force the city to work on a plan to benefit the entire region, according to a Monday news release.

“Annexing huge tracts of productive farmland, prime commercial and industrial land and our regional airport just isn’t right,” co-chair Clarence Shields says in the release.

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/edmo...onton+annexation+plan/9382232/story.html
You got to love how those trying to prevent annexation are making it seem like they are standing up to sprawl.

If the County of Leduc was interested in maintaining this area as agricultural they wouldn't have multiple area structure plans for this area (Crossroads and a tentative highway 19 industrial area that has stalled because Alberta Transportation cant get their shit together). The county wants this area for one purpose....industrial land....and they are playing the local farmers like fiddles to gain their support blaming the big bad CoE.

If you want Nisku II, don't support annexation. it will become a shithole just like Nisku over time. Just another municipality pissing away what should be an excellent source of tax revenue for the region.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
     
     
  #9719  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 3:35 PM
hilman's Avatar
hilman hilman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,763
Close but no cigar, CityTV tweeted out the final tally for the airport:

Quote:
Record year for @FlyEIA- 6,983,000 passengers served; an increase of 306,000 from 2012
https://twitter.com/CitytvEdmonton

Edit:

FlyEIA news release:
Quote:
The sky was the limit for EIA in 2013: Record passenger numbers
Tuesday, January 14, 2014


January 14, 2014 (Edmonton, AB) – Air service and aviation business in the Edmonton Region grew rapidly in 2013 to meet community demand.

“These record-breaking numbers show that Edmonton International Airport completed its expansion just in time. EIA is a not-for-profit corporation that works for the benefit of our region. To foster economic growth, both air service and our airport facilities must keep pace with demand from our region,” said EIA Vice President of Passenger Market Development Traci Bednard.”

Highlights of 2013 at EIA

Record Passenger Numbers: 2013 was the busiest year in EIA history with 6,983,000 passengers served; 306,000 more than in 2012.

Numbers of Passengers Served at EIA from January 1 to December 31, 2013

Domestic 5,312,226 = 4% growth
US Transborder 1,264,796 = 7.7% growth
International 406,207 = 3.4% growth
Overall 6,983,229 = 4.6% growth – all time record!
Business Aviation: In addition to regularly scheduled airline passenger service, corporate charter flights from the private terminals at EIA had increased by 30% in 2013, to nearly 26,000 landings.
http://corporate.flyeia.com/news/sky-was-limit-eia-2013-record-passenger-numbers
     
     
  #9720  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2014, 3:36 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
Close enough, 7 mil is a good milestone!
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:08 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.