Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackslack
I remember when Calgary new Scotiabank Arena was being proposed and there was uproar that the Flames should pay for all of it, even if they don’t end up owning it. I mean, I get that the Flames will massively benefit from it, however it will bring in not only 41 games of hockey, plus another 34 junior hockey games and another 42 AHL games, but all the concerts and economic activity the come with it… yet in Montreal there is no primary secondary or tertiary tenant. Sure they will bring in many acts, but I’d expect there to be uproar for billions spent on a stadium that doesn’t have a tenant, if there was uproar for one that doesn’t.
It just wouldn’t make sense to me for the city of Calgary to not be a partner in the building of a world class stadium that will be used a minimum of 120 nights a year for just the tenants not accounting for other events, with the the potential for a team to leave the city, then the city spending a billion to renovate the saddledome because it’s an iconic part of the city… without a tenant.
#nottrolling
|
Montreal is not spending anything, it's the Quebec government that is putting the money. It's the largest stadium in the province and will benefit not just Montreal but everyone. $870M
Winter activities were always complicated and/or cancelled because of the roof. The stadium was occupied 180 days a year before the renovation in 2024.
Now that the REM will be fully operational in 2027, you will be able to land in YUL and attend a concert or a major event in the Olympic Stadium using only the REM and the METRO.