HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9381  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 3:06 AM
bryantm3 bryantm3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: East Point
Posts: 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post
33 Peachtree Place

in this photo we're looking at the west peachtree side of the building with the left side going up peachtree place.

okay, if this rendering reflects the current design, that means *fronting the MARTA station* we're going to have NO active use. forget me worrying about crescent avenue and 8th street. i was sure we were looking at the peachtree place side of it. you'd think if the address was '33 peachtree place' they'd actually have something on peachtree place besides a deck entrance and some blank walls.
     
     
  #9382  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 6:16 AM
Ant131531 Ant131531 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,984
I think the side with the 'RESTAURANT' sign is facing the MARTA station. They said townhome stoops or whatever would be facing Crescent and the tower was on W Peachtree.
     
     
  #9383  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 9:44 AM
bryantm3 bryantm3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: East Point
Posts: 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
I think the side with the 'RESTAURANT' sign is facing the MARTA station. They said townhome stoops or whatever would be facing Crescent and the tower was on W Peachtree.
that's what i was thinking as well, until i saw this:



this image pretty clearly shows that the tower will front 8th street, with the ends at west peachtree and crescent. that means we're looking down peachtree place in the other rendering.

now that you mention townhomes, i think townhomes with stoops would be perfect for fronting cypress. however, i'm afraid we're going to get a first floor parking deck with some apartment windows above. it'd be nice to have some townhomes intown, especially on a sidestreet like cypress.
     
     
  #9384  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 12:31 PM
ATL_J's Avatar
ATL_J ATL_J is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 471
I've seen the architecturals on this project and while the renderings shared aren't great, they look much better than what I think the actual project will turn out like. Considering the location of this project, I am highly disappointed in what they put together. The tower looks cheap and uninspired, a Novare glass and concrete tower would have been better (and that says a lot), while the apartments that surround most of the complex use materials you'd see most only your typical garden-style apartment complex - EIFS, faux brick / stone, and fiber cement siding. Maybe it'll turn out okay? Its not my personal tastes and in my opinion, comes off as cheap.
     
     
  #9385  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 12:46 PM
ATL_J's Avatar
ATL_J ATL_J is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by bryantm3 View Post
that's what i was thinking as well, until i saw this:

this image pretty clearly shows that the tower will front 8th street, with the ends at west peachtree and crescent. that means we're looking down peachtree place in the other rendering.

now that you mention townhomes, i think townhomes with stoops would be perfect for fronting cypress. however, i'm afraid we're going to get a first floor parking deck with some apartment windows above. it'd be nice to have some townhomes intown, especially on a sidestreet like cypress.
I think you mean Cypress and not Crescent? The restaurant is at the corner of West Peachtree and Peachtree Place, so I'd say that's "facing" the Midtown MARTA station.

There's another retail space along Peachtree Place right across from the MARTA station with the entrance to the parking deck there too.

What they mean by "townhomes" is that the lower level apartments in some places have private entrances. Best I can describe that is if you're familiar with the AMLI Old Fourth Ward or Bohemian House apartments over on Glen Iris, the lower level apartments have doors that address the street. It doesn't look town home-y or anything, but at least it prevents the building from feeling / being so insular.

This is a lot of residential and retail taking up what was once just a parking lot, so it's hard for me to complain too much, but as I mentioned before, I'm extremely underwhelmed with the material and layout. I would've liked to see something more interesting, especially considering it's location, and I would've liked to see a layout that addressed the Midtown MARTA station better.
     
     
  #9386  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 1:59 PM
shivtim's Avatar
shivtim shivtim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Midtown Atlanta
Posts: 2,623
I understand some of the complaints about 33 Peachtree Pl, but can't say I agree. It's heaps better than the hideous separate parking decks we've seen Novare throwing up with its recent apartment towers. It will still be pretty good density, has hidden parking, and is mostly wrapped with active uses. Seems similar to the Plaza Midtown block across the street, which is one of the best blocks in the area.
     
     
  #9387  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 2:01 PM
thebigATL's Avatar
thebigATL thebigATL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 454
e idea of flipping the Turner Field area into a horseracing track with legalized pari-mutuel betting could have serious legs, Creative Loafing reports. Or it might simply be a stampede of rumors. Either way, Mayor Kasim Reed appears to be an early opponent, favoring a Glenwood Park II-type plan for the acreage the Braves will leave behind. [CL]

http://m.atlanta.curbed.com/archives/2014/02/10/giddyup.php
__________________
BETTER ATLANTA-ATLANTA PEACH ANGLE
     
     
  #9388  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 2:02 PM
thebigATL's Avatar
thebigATL thebigATL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 454
e idea of flipping the Turner Field area into a horseracing track with legalized pari-mutuel betting could have serious legs, Creative Loafing reports. Or it might simply be a stampede of rumors. Either way, Mayor Kasim Reed appears to be an early opponent, favoring a Glenwood Park II-type plan for the acreage the Braves will leave behind. [CL]

http://m.atlanta.curbed.com/archives/2014/02/10/giddyup.php
__________________
BETTER ATLANTA-ATLANTA PEACH ANGLE
     
     
  #9389  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 3:26 PM
clexmond clexmond is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by shivtim View Post
I understand some of the complaints about 33 Peachtree Pl, but can't say I agree. It's heaps better than the hideous separate parking decks we've seen Novare throwing up with its recent apartment towers. It will still be pretty good density, has hidden parking, and is mostly wrapped with active uses. Seems similar to the Plaza Midtown block across the street, which is one of the best blocks in the area.
Plaza isn't bad on 2 sides (W. Peachtree and Peachtree Place) but the other two sides are either mediocre (Spring) or terrible (8th St.). The curb cut and massive ventilation systems make the 8th St. side especially awful and are frequently used as an example of what never to approve again in the DRC meetings.
     
     
  #9390  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 5:29 PM
Dettmann1 Dettmann1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 64
Couple of updates

33 Peachtree Place
I was in the area this weekend and it looks like the tree demolition sign was up. Not sure how long it has been there, but anyone that has done permitting with the city of Atlanta should know that is one of the steps in the review process for a development.

I was at the Mandarin over the weekend and had a clear view of both the Novare and Dante's sites. In addition, I drove by the Post Alexander Site. Wish I'd taken pictures, but I forgot to.

Dante's down the hatch apartment building
They are working on the buildings now with some columns that have gone vertical. Nothing too big yet, but at least the building is going up now.

Skyhouse Buckhead
They sure made quick work on the site and pretty much worked on it all weekend. Site is cleared and looks like they were doing some initial foundation work.

Post Alexander
I noticed an aerial crane on the site for Post Alexander Phase II this weekend. I'm guessing that means this thing is full steam ahead.

Just a couple of quick updates...sorry there aren't any pictures.
     
     
  #9391  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 9:57 PM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
Seems like Atlanta's got some exciting projects going on. Yes 33 Peachtree Pl is ugly as sin, but as shivtim said, it replaces a HUGE parking lot scar in Midtown's fabric, and the retail facing W. Peachtree makes sense given the retail across the street.

I hope that they include street parking on the W. Peachtree side. If the city wants to be serious about pedestrian life and walkability, it needs to tone down its vehicular streets by about 20 notches.
     
     
  #9392  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 10:29 PM
Newnan_Eric's Avatar
Newnan_Eric Newnan_Eric is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by simms3_redux View Post
Seems like Atlanta's got some exciting projects going on. Yes 33 Peachtree Pl is ugly as sin, but as shivtim said, it replaces a HUGE parking lot scar in Midtown's fabric, and the retail facing W. Peachtree makes sense given the retail across the street.

I hope that they include street parking on the W. Peachtree side. If the city wants to be serious about pedestrian life and walkability, it needs to tone down its vehicular streets by about 20 notches.
If you look at the projects going on ITP currently, and almosts every single one proposed (except the Falcons Stadium) nearly every project replaces a parking lot, vacant lot, or underwhelming "plaza." The vast majority of these projects are within a 5 minute walk to MARTA stations or are by the Beltline or Centenial Olympic Park.

We can quibble about the designs, and the parking decks, but I still think things are moving in a positive direction.
     
     
  #9393  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 10:52 PM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
^^^And not to mention that Atlanta's rents are not where they need to be for real quality design, anyway. Midtown and Buckhead land prices aren't cheap, but rents still are. It's amazing given the land basis and construction costs in a market like Atlanta what a difference $0.25/sf or $0.50/sf in rents can make. I'm content with the product going up given the rents and where the city is in its "life cycle". That still doesn't mean folks can't hope for or try for better. If rents do really start skyrocketing from the $1.85-$2.25 range for new/high-end product today to a base of $2.25, pushing towards $3.00/sf for higher end product, Atlanta should undoubtedly build the same quality of product going up in Chicago, Philadelphia, Seattle, and Miami (I say Miami, but in terms of materials only, Atlanta does better in terms of adding in commercial components).

Also, there's a higher market risk factor for developers in Atlanta. I think there will always be a quality/risk-weighted return imbalance in the city, given how developer friendly + economically cyclical/shaky + lacking in infrastructure the city is (plus it's not a coastal city and being coastal makes all the difference nowadays). If a developer has more sound fundamentals to back up his initial proforma return for that 300+ unit mid/high-rise, I'm sure the developer may see reasoning to invest more in materials and design. But timing seems to be everything in Atlanta, rather than actual product. Build and sell in the appropriate window. It's easier for a new buyer to underwrite a stabilized building in an off cycle window than a developer to perfectly time the window with which to build and then lease-up that same building, in Atlanta.

Like I said, though, the more surface lots that can be replaced, the better long term. This one eliminates a really large lot. I think once this one is developed and leased, local planners/DRC types should push back on developers and ask for better product. It will be easier for developers to focus on their product with fewer large lots available for development.
     
     
  #9394  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 11:22 PM
mayhem mayhem is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Downtown ATL
Posts: 1,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATL_J View Post
I guess eye of the beholder? I think they look nice. Also, it's the Midtown Alliance's money, not MARTA.
Thanks for the clarifying.
__________________
SHERMAN SHOULD HAVE BURNED GWINNETT.
     
     
  #9395  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2014, 11:27 PM
mayhem mayhem is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Downtown ATL
Posts: 1,551
Definitely echoing the sentiment that 33 Peachtree Place is not looking good. While I'd love to see retail wrap around the building, it wouldn't be practical. It is very disappointing that the Peachtre Place frontage seems to have almost zero retail. This street could provide some nice density with everything that's already existing in addition to what could have been with 33.
__________________
SHERMAN SHOULD HAVE BURNED GWINNETT.
     
     
  #9396  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 1:07 AM
scania's Avatar
scania scania is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA (DTLA)/Atlanta, Ga. (Midtown)
Posts: 2,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayhem View Post
Definitely echoing the sentiment that 33 Peachtree Place is not looking good. While I'd love to see retail wrap around the building, it wouldn't be practical. It is very disappointing that the Peachtre Place frontage seems to have almost zero retail. This street could provide some nice density with everything that's already existing in addition to what could have been with 33.
I think it makes perfect business sense to have retail along West Peachtree St. You are going to attract more people that will be willing to spend their money. There's just much more traffic along West Peachtree.
__________________
It's a beautiful day!
     
     
  #9397  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 1:59 AM
ATL_J's Avatar
ATL_J ATL_J is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by simms3_redux View Post
^^^And not to mention that Atlanta's rents are not where they need to be for real quality design, anyway. Midtown and Buckhead land prices aren't cheap, but rents still are. It's amazing given the land basis and construction costs in a market like Atlanta what a difference $0.25/sf or $0.50/sf in rents can make. I'm content with the product going up given the rents and where the city is in its "life cycle". That still doesn't mean folks can't hope for or try for better. If rents do really start skyrocketing from the $1.85-$2.25 range for new/high-end product today to a base of $2.25, pushing towards $3.00/sf for higher end product, Atlanta should undoubtedly build the same quality of product going up in Chicago, Philadelphia, Seattle, and Miami (I say Miami, but in terms of materials only, Atlanta does better in terms of adding in commercial components).

Also, there's a higher market risk factor for developers in Atlanta. I think there will always be a quality/risk-weighted return imbalance in the city, given how developer friendly + economically cyclical/shaky + lacking in infrastructure the city is (plus it's not a coastal city and being coastal makes all the difference nowadays). If a developer has more sound fundamentals to back up his initial proforma return for that 300+ unit mid/high-rise, I'm sure the developer may see reasoning to invest more in materials and design. But timing seems to be everything in Atlanta, rather than actual product. Build and sell in the appropriate window. It's easier for a new buyer to underwrite a stabilized building in an off cycle window than a developer to perfectly time the window with which to build and then lease-up that same building, in Atlanta.

Like I said, though, the more surface lots that can be replaced, the better long term. This one eliminates a really large lot. I think once this one is developed and leased, local planners/DRC types should push back on developers and ask for better product. It will be easier for developers to focus on their product with fewer large lots available for development.
Its a fallacy that high rents are needed to achieve good design. Good developers with good architects can achieve quality design using cheap materials. Rents have nothing to do with the the quality of the design. Sure, you can maybe spend more on a quality architect with a higher rents or put in more expensive interior items or use more expensive / unique facades, but quality design = / = expensive

Edit: And to add, those cities you list, they put up plenty of ugly looking projects too. I understand you're relating to projects in way you know how (price per square foot = more money to spend on quality materials = better quality building), but expensive facade is not indicative of good design. For example, I looked a project today going up in Raleigh that is putting up a very expensive facade. The design is meh, but the facade is expensive. I also have looked over a lot in the cities you mention that are ugly, poorly designed, with bad form.

Going back to this project, there are plenty of inexpensive ways to clad a project and you can do a lot of neat things if you're creative. This project's form, the way it addresses the MARTA station, which I think would / could have been a huge selling point for the project, is poor. You'd be surprised at how many uncreative architects there are out there and how many developers / customers try to tell an architect how to design (despite the developer / customer having poor taste, no design skill) to the detriment of their project.

To reiterate: I'm happy a parking lot is being covered, I'm not happy with the design / look of the project and the garden-style apartment materials. If this was elsewhere in the city and not right on West Peachtree right in front of the Midtown MARTA station I wouldn't care as much or feel as strongly.

Last edited by ATL_J; Feb 11, 2014 at 3:30 AM.
     
     
  #9398  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 2:06 AM
Ant131531 Ant131531 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATL_J View Post
Its a fallacy that high rents are needed to achieve good design. Good developers with good architects can achieve quality design using cheap materials. Rents have nothing to do with the the quality of the design. Sure, you can maybe spend more on a quality architect with a higher rents or put in more expensive interior items or use more expensive / unique facades, but quality design = / = expensive.
Exactly. Most of NYC's highrises are ugly as sin and bland, but they still sell for a lot.
     
     
  #9399  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 4:47 AM
thebigATL's Avatar
thebigATL thebigATL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Exactly. Most of NYC's highrises are ugly as sin and bland, but they still sell for a lot.
That is so True, When I went their majority of them look like they wanted to build them so they can be in the skyline not to be known in it...That's why i'm glad Atlanta has great architecture for towers, all of them different. EXAMPLES:

Georgia Pacific: Stair Case Building
BOA TOWER: PENCIL BUILDING
1180 PEACHTREE: NAPKIN HOLDER
WESTIN TOWER: THE LARGE CONE

And every skyscraper in our skyline means something and doesn't look the same





Be careful tomorrow (snow,sleet,ice) please stay home if you can...Learned my lesson.
__________________
BETTER ATLANTA-ATLANTA PEACH ANGLE
     
     
  #9400  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 9:33 AM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
I agree, for the most part, but you speak from an architect's perspective, which no offense, is almost never realistic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATL_J View Post
Its a fallacy that high rents are needed to achieve good design. Good developers with good architects can achieve quality design using cheap materials. Rents have nothing to do with the the quality of the design. Sure, you can maybe spend more on a quality architect with a higher rents or put in more expensive interior items or use more expensive / unique facades, but quality design = / = expensive

In Atlanta you nailed it on the head already. First of all there isn't a lot of room to be aggressive with design and materials, financially, because Atlanta's a super risky market with flaky rent growth and huge untimely cycles, so a certain return is needed and VE is inevitable (this even happens in large core markets). Second of all, Atlanta is still not even close to being walkable or urban, so emphasis is on the apartment building itself, minus the amenities. The developer must provide a ton of on-site parking, larger units, higher end interior finishes and appliances, and a ridiculous amount of amenities, such as 24 hour concierge, pool, gym, library, etc. this is not the case in larger cities where a plethora of gyms exist within blocks, or people are ok with walking to a laundromat or doing it in the basement, and they are comfortable with basics and smaller units. So thus, on a tighter income stream with riskier growth projections and deeper cycles, developers in Atlanta must often pick and choose where they spend their money. Unfortunately, no matter how fancy or beautiful or well designed they make this tower, Wood won't achieve rents materially higher than Skyhouse, so why should they go out of their way to make it materially better?

Edit: And to add, those cities you list, they put up plenty of ugly looking projects too. I understand you're relating to projects in way you know how (price per square foot = more money to spend on quality materials = better quality building), but expensive facade is not indicative of good design.

Believe me when I say I agree with you that a facade does not equal all that entails design. However, an exterior facade on a new resi high rise in a prime CBD location in the skyline of a major city where there is opportunity to shine and stand out (Atlanta) is a major component of the design, both from a branding and immediate appeal standpoint and from a contextual standpoint. A 15 story building is not likely to even be constructed on prime land in NYC or SF or Chicago because the land itself is too expensive to justify that small a building and it wouldn't be visible or noticeable in the larger cityscape to begin with. In that sense it's not an apples to apples comparison, however even ~5 story low-rise product in these cities attempts to make a statement with their facades in certain hot or high end areas.

Going back to this project, there are plenty of inexpensivey ways to clad a project and you can do a lot of neat things if you're creative. This project's form, the way it addresses the MARTA station, which I think would / could have been a huge selling point for the project, is poor. You'd be surprised at how many uncreative architects there are out there and how many developers / customers try to tell an architect how to design (despite the developer / customer having poor taste, no design skill) to the detriment of their project.

Agree on all fronts, but Wood is a huge proven multi family shop based in Atlanta, but with a development presence everywhere. I'm pretty sure they are blah everywhere they are active, but again they operate in certain financial structures and they have found what works for them, similar to Novare, and they probably plan to use recycled methods, designs, and schemes until the day they don't work. You need different equity and a different developer if you want better/riskier.

To reiterate: I'm happy a parking lot is being covered, I'm not happy with the design / look of the project and the garden-style apartment materials. If this was elsewhere in the city and not right on West Peachtree right in front of the Midtown MARTA station I wouldn't care as much or feel as strongly.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:04 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.