Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper
People want a hotel or three for the reason of having consistent bodies on the ground but, what about the guests inhabiting those bodies? In time but, right now just about anywhere else downtown is better for visitors to have a better impression.
I get the whole hotel convention resort. The largest convention centre in Canada survived 20 years before building a hotel. It's also on an exhibition grounds disconnected from the urban downtown fabric. There's a difference with convention/hotel complexes that are within the downtown fabric and convention/hotel complexes that are off to a corner. Oddly, It does full circle with those auto centric airport complexes.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian
This hotel would be beside the arena (games, concerts and other events), BMO Centre (conventions and events), on the Stampede grounds (guaranteed sellout for 2 weeks of the year), a couple blocks from the central library, Studio Bell, Inglewood, St Patricks Island / Zoo. Stephen Ave or 17th would be a 5-10 minute walk. But you're right, terrible location! 
|
Seems like a very convenient spot to be, directly connected (probably) to the Convention Centre and Arena. I know when I go to a Conference, I prefer not having to put on my coat and walk in the cold to get from my hotel room and the conference.
It may not be the first choice for the average tourist (outside the stampede), but it will be for anyone going to BMO or the Arena. I'd even say it's convenient outside of that thanks to close access to the C-Train, current and future.
And eventually, the area will develop into its own urban enclave that will be be integrated with the rest of downtown fairly well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueandgoldguy
Meant Rogers Place.
|
For the love of God no.