HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


    Comcast Innovation & Technology Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Philadelphia Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Philadelphia Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8841  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2018, 9:58 PM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
Nice window treatment!

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8842  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2018, 11:53 PM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
So is the roof of this building or the other Comcast tower taller?
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8843  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 12:05 AM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoboZill4 View Post
So is the roof of this building or the other Comcast tower taller?
The roof of Comcast 1 is taller. For a fun illustration, see pic at top of link: http://philaphilia.blogspot.com/ The exact height of both roofs has been posted in the past, though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8844  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 12:10 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoboZill4 View Post
So is the roof of this building or the other Comcast tower taller?
The top of the Comcast Technology Center is taller.

The (impressive) top of the Comcast Center is mechanical equipment.
  • Comcast Center = 269.9 m
  • Comcast Technology Center = 303.3 m
Source
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8845  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 12:14 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook View Post
The roof of Comcast 1 is taller. For a fun illustration, see pic at top of link: http://philaphilia.blogspot.com/ The exact height of both roofs has been posted in the past, though.
This is pretty misleading. The roof of the new tower is 996', it's just much narrower at that point, so it may falsely appear lower (the main roof is).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8846  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 1:24 AM
Urbanthusiat's Avatar
Urbanthusiat Urbanthusiat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: South Philly
Posts: 1,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
This is pretty misleading. The roof of the new tower is 996', it's just much narrower at that point, so it may falsely appear lower (the main roof is).
While technically true, it’s really only how people perceive it that matters. I think most people would say Comcast 1 has a higher roof height.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8847  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 4:47 AM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Clark Park, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 4,013
I’ve always considered the spire to be the roof height because it runs along the entire spine of the building, but yes, technically the roof ends at the HVAC at 303m.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8849  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 1:38 PM
JohnIII JohnIII is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 429
These are amazing photos; absolutely amazing! I wish these photos could be shown on the local news to start the show; people who live in Philly but don't see the beauty of the city need to see it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8850  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 1:51 PM
Marcos Marcos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 277
as much as I love this building, & that's a lot, I've got to say that the lobby isn't nearly as impressive as the Comcast building. These seem to be reversed, there is a lot more 'technology' going on in Comcast while CTC has.... trees??? Don't get me wrong it's beautiful but doesn't seem to match the theme of the building.

Many times over the years I've walked into Comcast & just watched the show, there won't be any reason to randomly (repeatedly) pop into CTC's lobby however
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8851  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 2:54 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbanthusiat View Post
While technically true, it’s really only how people perceive it that matters. I think most people would say Comcast 1 has a higher roof height.
I guess, although one could technically argue that the roof of the new comcast is 1,121 since you can climb/stand on top of the spire

It's a bit of a stretch, but having seen this thing in person it's pretty dominant all the way to the structural top.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8852  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 6:36 PM
acumenhokie acumenhokie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Philly Area
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcos View Post
there won't be any reason to randomly (repeatedly) pop into CTC's lobby however
Going to quote this for use later.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8853  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 8:00 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
This is pretty misleading. The roof of the new tower is 996', it's just much narrower at that point, so it may falsely appear lower (the main roof is).
It's not misleading. The cooling towers and mechanical penthouse are not the roof. The roof is 911'6.

https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/comcast-technology-center/16192

https://www.emporis.com/buildings/1218372/comcast-innovation-technology-center-philadelphia-pa-usa

Also, I visually perceive Comcast 1 as having the higher roof. Not that I think any of this actually matters.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8854  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 8:03 PM
Marcos Marcos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by acumenhokie View Post
Going to quote this for use later.
did I miss something about what's going on in there
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8855  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 9:02 PM
wpipkins2 wpipkins2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by
[IMG
https://scontent-ort2-2.cdninstagram.com/vp/07c7913ff04c6b3ac1a941430b12b0c5/5C06F469/t51.2885-15/e35/37876452_470615360073933_1248473445927223296_n.jpg[/IMG]
https://www.instagram.com/p/BmPZOEDlIzC/?hl=en&taken-by=dahkman18
OMG! Look at her butt!

Philadelphia is dynamic. I love the Comcast complex from this view. Amazing!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8856  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2018, 11:39 PM
Tatts Tatts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
I guess, although one could technically argue that the roof of the new comcast is 1,121 since you can climb/stand on top of the spire

It's a bit of a stretch, but having seen this thing in person it's pretty dominant all the way to the structural top.
You cannot stand on the top of the spire (unless you balance on a beam). The top of the spire is not enclosed; there is no roof at the top of the lantern ('spire').

And 'roof', for purposes of assigning heights, is defined by the organizations that do the measuring, not by some fanciful acrobatics. At any rate, the top of a ladder or flight of stairs is clearly not a roof.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8857  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2018, 2:41 AM
JurassicPhilly JurassicPhilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 146
Everyone thinks Comcast 2 is taller than Comcast 1, but it's not. I mean, according to the experts, under certain circumstances, 975 feet is higher than 1121 feet. And 1121 feet is shorter than 975 feet.

I mean from certain angles, in certain pictures, I LOOK taller than my brother, who unfortunately has a long and thin head. I am 5'11 and he is 6'2". So I think I am, really, in a sense, taller than he is. It's the same thing. I mean nobody would argue he is taller than me, would they? On what basis? That he actually is? Smh.

Last edited by JurassicPhilly; Aug 11, 2018 at 3:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8858  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2018, 3:04 AM
Plokoon11 Plokoon11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,698
What?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8859  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2018, 4:15 AM
TK2001's Avatar
TK2001 TK2001 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Not your business
Posts: 2,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by JurassicPhilly View Post
Everyone thinks Comcast 2 is taller than Comcast 1, but it's not. I mean, according to the experts, under certain circumstances, 975 feet is higher than 1121 feet. And 1121 feet is shorter than 975 feet.

I mean from certain angles, in certain pictures, I LOOK taller than my brother, who unfortunately has a long and thin head. I am 5'11 and he is 6'2". So I think I am, really, in a sense, taller than he is. It's the same thing. I mean nobody would argue he is taller than me, would they? On what basis? That he actually is? Smh.
You must be talking about prospective. From any prospective these towers have the same height, the height can't change
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8860  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2018, 2:46 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatts View Post
You cannot stand on the top of the spire (unless you balance on a beam). The top of the spire is not enclosed; there is no roof at the top of the lantern ('spire').

And 'roof', for purposes of assigning heights, is defined by the organizations that do the measuring, not by some fanciful acrobatics. At any rate, the top of a ladder or flight of stairs is clearly not a roof.
You could easily stand up here, but I agree it's not really a real roof. It definitely makes an incredible skyline impact all the way to the top unlike many spires out there though. I also think it's fair to consider the cooling tower a part of the roof though since most buildings have some sort of mechanical element above the occupied area. Just because it's narrower doesn't mean it shouldn't count.




Photo is from: https://www.reddit.com/r/philadelphia/comments/88l6gt/comcast_technology_center_from_above/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.