HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Based on options for Broadway Corridor Study, what is your preferred choice?
BRT: Commercial to UBC 25 6.16%
LRT A: Commercial to UBC OR Commercial via VCC to UBC 31 7.64%
LRT B: Main St. to UBC AND Commercial to UBC 18 4.43%
RRT: Commercial to UBC OR VCC to UBC 283 69.70%
COMBO: RRT to Arbutus/LRT to Main St via Arbutus 39 9.61%
BUS: Enhanced Bus Service for all buses to UBC 10 2.46%
Voters: 406. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8041  
Old Posted May 7, 2017, 5:26 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
I would assume / hope that this is related to phase 2 of the expansion.
It seems unlikely as phase 2 is only planned to go to Arbutus. The presence of a gas station on the corner of W Broadway and MacDonald seems a more likely explanation.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
     
     
  #8042  
Old Posted May 7, 2017, 7:28 PM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
It seems unlikely as phase 2 is only planned to go to Arbutus. The presence of a gas station on the corner of W Broadway and MacDonald seems a more likely explanation.
isnt phase 1 going to arbutus and phase 2 to UBC? seems weird they'd be doing geological studies past arbutus unless they will be planning to UBC now and then just build it phased. would be cheaper i would imagine then having to do more studies later. not like ground conditions will change that fast, hopefully...
     
     
  #8043  
Old Posted May 7, 2017, 7:42 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,992
isn't phase 1 what already exists ending at vcc clarke?
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #8044  
Old Posted May 7, 2017, 8:59 PM
Mac Write Mac Write is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,423
Yes
Phase 1 - VCC > Columbia
Phase 2 - Laughed > Douglas
Phase 3 - VCC > UBC (orginal plan).
     
     
  #8045  
Old Posted May 7, 2017, 9:41 PM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
isn't phase 1 what already exists ending at vcc clarke?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Write View Post
Yes
Phase 1 - VCC > Columbia
Phase 2 - Laughed > Douglas
Phase 3 - VCC > UBC (orginal plan).
yes, from almost 20 years ago. this is pretty much an independent project now, being built in 2 phases being attached to the already complete Millennium-Line.
     
     
  #8046  
Old Posted May 7, 2017, 9:57 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,046
Right. TransLink's new 10-Year Plan has Phase One as bus improvements and Phase Two as the Arbutus extension/Surrey LRT/Patullo replacement. Digging to UBC is probably Phase Three... or part of TransLink's Great Leap Forward.
     
     
  #8047  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 12:01 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Right. TransLink's new 10-Year Plan has Phase One as bus improvements and Phase Two as the Arbutus extension/Surrey LRT/Patullo replacement. Digging to UBC is probably Phase Three... or part of TransLink's Great Leap Forward.
but that's for the whole plan. if we are talking about Broadway specifically wouldn't phase 1 be to Arbutus and then phase 2 to UBC? that makes sense to me, for this specific corridor anyways.

but i don't know. i don't follow these projects enough, I'm just hoping for 2 individual bored tunnels and that for construction they widen 12th Ave by a lane if it fits with the trees there.
     
     
  #8048  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 1:20 AM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 764
This project is phase 1, 2, and 3 depending on which plans you are looking at

The Broadway extension to Arbutus is half of Phase 3 of the original Millennium Line plans (Phase 1: Columbia to VCC-Clark, Phase 2: Lougheed to Lafarge, Phase 3: VCC-Clark to UBC).

The Broadway extension to Arbutus is part of Phase 2 of the Mayors' Council 10-year transportation plan (Phase 1: bus service and design work, Phase 2: construction work).

The Broadway extension to Arbutus is Phase 1 of the Millennium Line Broadway Extension project (Phase 1: VCC-Clark to Arbutus, Phase 2: Arbutus to UBC).
     
     
  #8049  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 1:22 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,610
Was SNC doing drilling on the rest of Broadway?
     
     
  #8050  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 1:41 AM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,511
too many phases

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpogue View Post
This project is phase 1, 2, and 3 depending on which plans you are looking at

The Broadway extension to Arbutus is Phase 1 of the Millennium Line Broadway Extension project (Phase 1: VCC-Clark to Arbutus, Phase 2: Arbutus to UBC).
Thanks for listing the possibilities, Door 3 is indeed the one I was meaning.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Was SNC doing drilling on the rest of Broadway?

Looking back at my previous posts, the stretch between Main St. and Manitoba St. was listed as "Private Contractors Environmental Investigation." The stretch between Hemlock St. and Granville St. was performed by Golder Associates Environmental Investigation
     
     
  #8051  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 1:56 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,913
It is pretty clear in the context of the original question that phase one is VCC to Arbutus, and phase two is Arbutus to UBC.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #8052  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 7:57 AM
Hooknose Hooknose is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarBreStr18 View Post
Even better NE, NW , SW entrances , then the Broadway/Cambie intersection wont be such a nightmare.
Besides putting entrances on the four corners of Bway and Cambie, why not put one at the Ash or Yukon street end of the "box".
The box for the station will be almost the entire block between either Cambie and Ash or Cambie and Yukon.
Why make someone walk from Ash to Cambie and then walk back the length of the station underground. The same would go for a Cambie and Yukon box.
I have to wonder why that does not happen.
     
     
  #8053  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 3:40 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
It seems unlikely as phase 2 is only planned to go to Arbutus. The presence of a gas station on the corner of W Broadway and MacDonald seems a more likely explanation.
Yeah, they'll need to see if there's any contaminated soil that may have spread under either Broadway or MacDonald, because remediating that is a relatively costly and lengthy operation. They probably want to get that out of the way very early in the process.
     
     
  #8054  
Old Posted May 8, 2017, 8:56 PM
M00dy M00dy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
Unless you know something I don't, then I don't think the larger diameter would be worse for the sink holes. Generally bigger TBMs handle boulders better, which leads to less damage and fewer interventions to repair the damage. Interventions are where the sink holes form during excavation.

Perhaps you could argue that the sink holes would be larger in a larger TBM because the area behind the cutter head is larger.
I'm not knowledgeable enough about tunneling to know if larger diameter handle boulders better. I do know that 1x10m diameter bore has a larger cross-sectional area than 2x6m diameter bores. This would mean it has a greater likelyhood of hitting boulders to begin with. From what I understand any encountering of boulders became a challenge on evergreen because of the mix of boulders & silty sands.

I have heard rumours that the ground will be better for tunneling along the broadway corridor.
     
     
  #8055  
Old Posted May 11, 2017, 9:29 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Just zipped past the drilling going on near Broadway near Oak.

I noticed that one rig near Laurel was drilling vertically (90 degrees) as I've seen before, but the other rig closer to Oak was angled at 75 degrees drilling eastwards.

Any ideas as to why they are drilling at a non-typical odd angle?
     
     
  #8056  
Old Posted May 11, 2017, 9:40 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hooknose View Post
Besides putting entrances on the four corners of Bway and Cambie, why not put one at the Ash or Yukon street end of the "box".
The box for the station will be almost the entire block between either Cambie and Ash or Cambie and Yukon.
Why make someone walk from Ash to Cambie and then walk back the length of the station underground. The same would go for a Cambie and Yukon box.
I have to wonder why that does not happen.
I think Translink believes one entrance mezzanine is easier to keep secure than two or more.

However, most of the current Skytrain mezzanines also have an emergency exit at the end of the mezzanine opposite from the main station entrance. This is probably more to do with fire regs.

ie: Granville @ Robson:

https://www.google.com/maps/@49.2814028,...__NSRdeRF328sg4exzk-Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Last edited by jsbertram; May 11, 2017 at 9:52 PM.
     
     
  #8057  
Old Posted May 11, 2017, 9:50 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
so ...

after the In-Decision 2017 earlier this week, who will be a better supporter (and funder) of the Arbutus extension?

Libs & Greens?
NDP & Greens?

I doubt the BC Libs are happy to pour money into NDP ridings - especially the ones they lost - so I won't be surprised to have funding for this project delayed until it can be announced by BCLibs with great fanfare just before (or during) the next BC election campaign. Which may be as soon as Fall 2018


On the other hand, if NDP gets power, they're more likely to shovel money into their ridings. And might even add another $ Billion to get the line built right out to UBC rather than stop at Arbutus. And during the next campaign the NDP can have lots of "see how good we're treating you?" ads.
     
     
  #8058  
Old Posted May 11, 2017, 9:55 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,992
i saw what i guess was drilling this past monday on broadway but i forget the cross street but it was about halfway between main and cambie.
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #8059  
Old Posted May 11, 2017, 10:05 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,557
If this election ends in a minority government, I see that as a bad thing for major projects. The appetite to make new multi-billion dollar investments will be light. Parties will be fighting for their lives and gearing up for the inevitable next election.

They may talk big, but commitments will be few and far between IMO.
     
     
  #8060  
Old Posted May 12, 2017, 3:29 AM
Bobert Bobert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
If this election ends in a minority government, I see that as a bad thing for major projects. The appetite to make new multi-billion dollar investments will be light. Parties will be fighting for their lives and gearing up for the inevitable next election.

They may talk big, but commitments will be few and far between IMO.
Expected IMO. There are issues bigger than transportation that should be solved first, if we are to stick with a minority government.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:57 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.