HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Politics


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 5:26 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
Pacific Spirit is currently a Metro Vancouver regional park, it should be able to remain that way regardless of what happens.
Totally. Save the remaining forest land. It should remain the green lung of Vancouver in perpetuity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 6:08 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,664
Personally, as I know little about forests outside of a great building material, but isn't the desire to keep the forest more to do with the ground plane and below rather than the effects from the canopy?

Last edited by GenWhy?; May 11, 2023 at 6:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 6:39 PM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Personally, as I know little about forests outside of a great building material, but isn't the desire to keep the forest more to do with the ground plane and below rather than the affects from the canopy?
Yes this is a big part of it. Trees dont use as much CO2 as people believe but mainly storage and when the rot or burn all the CO2 that was stored in them are released. What they do a good job is taking ground water and introducing it into our air to keep humidity balanced and the same to help stabilize temps.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 9:08 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,896
The canopy is useful too - get rid of that, and you kick a lot of birds (eagles, owls, etc) out of the inner metro.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 9:50 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
The canopy is useful too - get rid of that, and you kick a lot of birds (eagles, owls, etc) out of the inner metro.
Oh, are we going to start complaining about demovictions for birds now?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 9:56 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,896
Given that a large part of the city likes to keep those birds around? Absolutely. Given enough rezoning, the people are much easier to house.

If we're so bulldozer-happy, we should probably start with the cemeteries - right now the dead are starting to have better accommodations than the living.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 10:11 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
If we're so bulldozer-happy, we should probably start with the cemeteries - right now the dead are starting to have better accommodations than the living.
Actually a great idea, cemeteries are such an inefficient land use.

Also stoked to see you onboard with letting birds have their homes, let's keep that same energy when we're talking about suburban sprawl in Surrey/Langley/Maple Ridge/Coquitlam/West Vancouver destroying multiple times the habitat
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 10:24 PM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Given that a large part of the city likes to keep those birds around? Absolutely. Given enough rezoning, the people are much easier to house.

If we're so bulldozer-happy, we should probably start with the cemeteries - right now the dead are starting to have better accommodations than the living.
That would be a great idea (especially to build an Urban Park in Brentwood)- except the last time someone's moved a cemetery was to build the New Westminster High School.

Now, they're trying to turn the area into a park or keep it fallow because building that school was insulting to the Asians buried there... or something.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 10:46 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Given that a large part of the city likes to keep those birds around? Absolutely. Given enough rezoning, the people are much easier to house
I didn't take you for a conservative "status quo must be maintained at any cost" minded individual. Were you up in arms when UBC evicted an eagle to build housing on campus?

Quote:
If we're so bulldozer-happy, we should probably start with the cemeteries - right now the dead are starting to have better accommodations than the living.
Abso-fricking-lutely. As someone with family members buried in Vancouver and Burnaby, I'll come out and say it's a tragedy that we have politically untouchable sacred ground polluting our city centres. Second growth forests with sparse pathways through them make better parks than god forsaken cemetaries.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 10:46 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
... Also stoked to see you onboard with letting birds have their homes, let's keep that same energy when we're talking about suburban sprawl in Surrey/Langley/Maple Ridge/Coquitlam/West Vancouver destroying multiple times the habitat
Don't remember saying that was a good idea either. Rezone the West Side for multiplexes, and neither the gravedigging nor the deforestation nor the sprawl have to be a thing for the next fifty years.

Though I do agree crematoriums and back-to-nature funerals should be more common in BC...

Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
I didn't take you for a conservative "status quo must be maintained at any cost" minded individual...
You may recall me suggesting above that we find a balance between developing the outskirts of the UEL while preserving the forest in the middle. It's a known fact that access to flora and fauna improves a city's quality of life and overall mental health.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 10:47 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
The canopy is useful too - get rid of that, and you kick a lot of birds (eagles, owls, etc) out of the inner metro.
I'm all for deforestation if we can get rid of a few canadian geese.
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 10:54 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
You may recall me suggesting above that we find a balance between developing the outskirts of the UEL while preserving the forest in the middle. It's a known fact that access to nature improves a city's quality of life.
Access to second growth forest or access to city parks? My understanding is it's the latter. I'd also hardly call the interior of Pacific Spirit Park "accessible".

Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
I'm all for deforestation if we can get rid of a few canadian geese.
I wonder if you've heard...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 10:57 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
Access to second growth forest or access to city parks? My understanding is it's the latter. I'd also hardly call the interior of Pacific Spirit Park "accessible".
There's trails all over the place. Keeping (let's say) two-ish Stanley Parks' worth of forest isn't going to raise the cost of living, but seeing a bald eagle or a woodpecker up close definitely makes your day.

Again, I do agree that some of the UEL could be landscaped for public use. Gardens, ponds, lakes, rec/sports centres, maybe a zoo, would satisfy both humans and non-humans.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 11:04 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
I didn't take you for a conservative "status quo must be maintained at any cost" minded individual. Were you up in arms when UBC evicted an eagle to build housing on campus?
Sounds like the eagle had right of first refusal at the same rent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted May 11, 2023, 11:07 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,664
Biophilia anyone?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted May 12, 2023, 3:45 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Being able to take the subway into a forest from the middle of the city sounds amazing! I honestly don't know what I would do if I just had easy access to a bunch of tramped-on turf or soccer field. Quite similar to providing good transit to Balcarra or Deep Cove. Just in this case the next westerly stop is a major university.

Why can't overgrown parks have good transit?
Sperling-Burnaby Lake SkyTrain station is sad you've forgotten about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted May 12, 2023, 4:30 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
..I doubt that Metro Vancouver Forests make any meaningful contribution to slowing climate change.
I imagine every jurisdiction says that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
The problem with the UEL SFHs right now is their status in Electoral Area A.
Block F has renewed the discussion to incorporate it, which is why we are here.

There's no way UEL would be incorporated or merged into CoV without adding the UBC's lands into the package.

Merging UBC and UEL into a single incorporated municipality would give UBC the privilege of buying up the SFHs and turning them into general rental (the residential lands in UBC itself are designed for student housing- aside from (kind of, sort of, not really) Acadia Park.

Incorporating just the UEL into the CoV or its own municipality sans UBC gives little potential for redevelopment of the SFHs, as they have the power to dictate planning in the area..
Those houses are already being used in some cases as multifamily. Check out the pics in this listing (and seriously, who writes sh!t like this?!):

Enjoy your prestigious life and next new chapter of owning the large and beautiful mansion of "Resort & Hotel" style at the Conner lot in UBC. Renovated kitchen and family room opens to south facing patio and jacuzzi spa pool at rear is ideal for family life. One of the best opportunities to own in prestigious UBC! Renovated all bathrooms, kitchen, appliances, floors, painting, lights and blinds. South facing patio ideal for entertaining, upper level has ocean view. 12 bedrooms, 1 large den, 6 renovated bathrooms, extraordinary suitable for those attending in UBC, University Hill Secondary, and Elementary School (10-min walk) catchment. you and family can be fond of the highest-class life in the most valuable West coast of Canada. Total gross rent: $9,000 until May 31, 2022.


https://www.rew.ca/properties/504952...erty_click=map
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Politics
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:16 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.