HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7301  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 4:50 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Chicago is the birthplace of the modern skyscraper, so even New York lags on some of the historic towers, even though some of the earliest towers have been demolished, in both cities.
     
     
  #7302  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 5:05 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
Chicago is the birthplace of the modern skyscraper, so even New York lags on some of the historic towers, even though some of the earliest towers have been demolished, in both cities.
1930's Chicago had a better skyline than 2015 Montreal...
     
     
  #7303  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 5:34 PM
Mrs Sauga Mrs Sauga is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 730
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkahHigh View Post
1930's Chicago had a better skyline than 2015 Montreal...
1930's Chicago and especially 1930's NY had a better skyline than 2015 any city in Canada (except Toronto) and most cities in the US.
     
     
  #7304  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 5:36 PM
Mrs Sauga Mrs Sauga is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 730
Looking at that aerial map, Chicago looks a lot bigger.
     
     
  #7305  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 5:46 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Sauga View Post
Looking at that aerial map, Chicago looks a lot bigger.
I walked Chicago's Downtown last November and it is absolutely massive. From one end of Michigan Avenue to another (from John Hancock to the Field Museum), it takes about 40 minutes. To get to the Willis Tower from Millenium Park it takes another 15-20 minutes.
     
     
  #7306  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 6:39 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Sauga View Post
Looking at that aerial map, Chicago looks a lot bigger.
It's not though, Toronto's travel's north away from Lake Ontario where as Chicago's stretches along the shore of Lake Michigan. I remember the view from the Hancock tower first of all being incredible but I was also amazed at how the city just drops off (height wise) a few blocks in from the lake.
     
     
  #7307  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 6:41 PM
flipv's Avatar
flipv flipv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkahHigh View Post
I walked Chicago's Downtown last November and it is absolutely massive. From one end of Michigan Avenue to another (from John Hancock to the Field Museum), it takes about 40 minutes. To get to the Willis Tower from Millenium Park it takes another 15-20 minutes.
The walk from the lake to Yorkville takes longer than 40 mins, the walk from Jarvis to Spadina is also around 20 mins. Chicago just has taller buildings in this space while Toronto has more >500ft towers. It adds to the illusion.
     
     
  #7308  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 6:59 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Pass me the Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 50,826
1930s lower Manhattan skyline is unbeatable. Best in history. Will never be bested.

skyscrapercity
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
     
     
  #7309  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 7:17 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,284
Yeah that is absolutely fantastic! The truly classic "skyline".
     
     
  #7310  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 7:36 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
So much awesomeness in one picture!
     
     
  #7311  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 8:20 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
The walk from the lake to Yorkville takes longer than 40 mins, the walk from Jarvis to Spadina is also around 20 mins. Chicago just has taller buildings in this space while Toronto has more >500ft towers. It adds to the illusion.
Lake to Yorkville - 45 minutes via Google Maps

Rosedale to the Annex - 36 Minutes
     
     
  #7312  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 11:12 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,121
Toronto has a big skyline that few cities can match, but looking at each skyline through Google's 3d imaging, Chicago still looks quite a bit bigger. Looking at Wikipedia's list, Chicago has 73 buildings over 550 feet vs Toronto's 24. That's a major difference. The tallest list for Chicago only goes down to 550', but there appear to be hundreds of sub 550 towers.
     
     
  #7313  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 11:28 PM
softee's Avatar
softee softee is offline
Aimless Wanderer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Downtown Toronto
Posts: 3,428
^ Yeah, but Toronto is catching up fast with eighteen 500+ foot towers under construction, compared to only three in Chicago.

Toronto also has loads more 500+ foot proposals than Chicago, and chances are the bulk of them will get built.
__________________
Public transit is the lifeblood of every healthy city.
     
     
  #7314  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2015, 11:29 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Sauga View Post
1930's Chicago and especially 1930's NY had a better skyline than 2015 any city in Canada (except Toronto) and most cities in the US.
Bigger maybe, but not better. A lot of beige and brown towers with too much happening. Like modern day London where every tower wants to be the centre of attention. New York's always had that issue (it's been subdued today just because the more modern styles are less busy). A good skyline is like a good building or a good room, there's focal points, but there's also negative space to provide contrast.
     
     
  #7315  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2015, 4:23 AM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipv View Post
The walk from the lake to Yorkville takes longer than 40 mins, the walk from Jarvis to Spadina is also around 20 mins. Chicago just has taller buildings in this space while Toronto has more >500ft towers. It adds to the illusion.
Absolute distances: From Bathurst / Front to Jarvis / Front is 2.6 km or 1.6 mi (this would be the classic skyline view looking north from the islands)

From Yonge / Queens Quay to Yonge / Bloor is 3.3 km or 2 mi (from the lake to Yorkville)

Average walking speed 5 km/hr: 30 mins east - west and 40 mins north - south

Chicago distances: Lakeshore / North Ave to Lakeshore / Roosevelt is 4.9 km or 3 mi

From Lakeshore / Grand to Halstead / Grand is 2.8 km or 2.75 mi

Average walking speed 5 km/hr: 35 mins east - west and 60 mins north - south

Overall, Chicago is bigger, but not by all that much... and in number of skyscrapers, it's a similar story, Chicago is ahead, but not by all that much...
     
     
  #7316  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2015, 7:57 AM
Ashok Ashok is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 602
I took this photo tonight:

Montreal by Asok Thirunavukarasu, on Flickr
     
     
  #7317  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2015, 1:37 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
^nice pic Ashok!
     
     
  #7318  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2015, 2:19 PM
Razor Razor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
1930s lower Manhattan skyline is unbeatable. Best in history. Will never be bested.

skyscrapercity
Fantastic pic!

Now I'm no architectural expert, but if I were to look in the dictionary under "art deco" skyline, would this pop up?

I love skylines from this period, but I'm also equally fascinated with those futuristic skylines a la' Shanghai.
     
     
  #7319  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2015, 3:29 PM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,072
/\ NY's Art Deco masterpieces are actually not visible on that pic: Chrysler, ES, Rockefeller Center... And that tells a lot about how amazing was New York back then compare to the rest of the world in terms of towers.
     
     
  #7320  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2015, 3:45 PM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,072
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:19 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.