HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #681  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2013, 7:35 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamieDavid Exchange View Post
Talking about LED lighting to light up the top of the Fortress Development for special occasions, I sure hope the tower on the CMHR installed LED lighting and not just ordinary spotlights. Would be nice to see colour changes, especially during Winnipeg Pride Week and other occasions.
Colored lights can hypnotize
Sparkle someone else's eyes
     
     
  #682  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2013, 8:29 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 40,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by roccerfeller View Post
it would be cool to see some rough comparisons of the proposals on the diagram page.

vid, you have some free time on your hands?
Unfortunately, no. I really shouldn't even be here right now.
     
     
  #683  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 3:57 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,705
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
So seems like unless everyone at Fortress is completely lying, this project has a good chance of going ahead. Why would they lie to have these details be brought out by the public (ie: folks on SSP, which we know the media and others watch)? Unless the condo sales are zero and no office or retail are sold, then okay, cancel it. But just seems like they're putting a lot of effort into this and constantly saying how it WILL go ahead. We know the past of some of the Fortress people, but would they really tarnish their rep just to look cool?
I dont want to be the negative nelly because i would love for this project to go ahead, of course. I really hope I am wrong.

I just am very sceptical of the process so far. About 6 months ago i finished a feasibility study for almost this exact project and I can tell you the numbers do not work...or they barely work.....in Winnipeg the construction cost rental/sale prices simply have too much gap for most developers.

I give this about a 1% chance of being built as it is being shown....the margins are so tight here that things like a 15 storey roof canopy simply will not fly....why do you think glasshouse looks like it does?....the economics are razor thin in our market.

There is a very long list of developers from out of province that come here thinking they can build 100,000 s.f. of office space....they find out quickly it is impossible...i have been through that so many times it makes me laugh.....the margins for that is even tighter....the chipmans got lucky to land stantec....there are precious few of those out there....why do you think sopo is treading on such thin ice....if they dont land the two government agencies looking for office space it simply will not happen....the cost of building new cannot match the rental rates of existing properties....not even close...construction costs are simply too high.

I also think 70,000 sf of retail is unrealistic....look at the empty storefronts on waterfont, the parkade on princess....the way portage place and city place struggle....where are the retailers coming from?

even things as simple as the 400 stall enclosed parkade is a stretch....why do you think we had to pay millions to the chipmans to support theirs?...or why the one in the exchange is so slow to happen?....and these are open air parkades....internal ones are exponentially more expensive because they have to be mechanically vented....our parking rates are simply way too low to support the cost...the payback isn't there...and condo buyers don't want to spend the $40-50k per stall it costs to construct....

the whole thing smells to me....you don't hire an architect at the end of your two year long process...they are the first person you hire....especially for developers new to the market....it is a long and detailed economic exercise and things like construction costs, zoning, codes, are critical to that....

in my experience by the time you can roll out a rendering you are very far along the road....units are planned, financials are worked out....if these guys have even bought the site it was no more than 2 days before this announcement....it was not sold then.

you don't sell 150 units to investment companies without even knowing your price points...i call BS on that whole thing....preliminary discussions at best....rental rates are too low to cover the investment...this isnt toronto.

it seems they are using the tactic, promise the world to see what sticks and then build that....generally its learn what is reasonable and propose that.....there is a reason the aspers are so secretive....or why we didn't hear about centre-point until it was practically under construction....look how careful they are being with the residential component....if there were investment groups out there waiting to snap up 150 units they would have been found earlier.

of course they are showing optimism, they are trying to sell something....they are not lying, they are selling....they will build whatever they sell and i cant see them selling what they have sketched.

if you look closely, they actually have not put all that much effort and investment into it....a glossy rendering and a couple of press conferences.....i have worked on projects like this that have gotten way farther down the line, with much more money spent, that simply vanished before ever seeing the light of day.

i hope i am completely wrong and winnipeg steps up and buys everything and we get a great building...i am just warning everyone to be sceptical of what you see....this drawing they unveiled is not based on the economics of our market...it will drastically change....i have been through it and know how tight the economics are....i'm talking about things like having full curtain wall is a stretch for a condo.....never mind a massive ornamental roof.

Last edited by trueviking; Sep 9, 2013 at 4:23 AM.
     
     
  #684  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 4:18 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,705
i hate to say it but Winnipeg's economics dictate that condo towers like this are much more feasible....repeating floor plates, 50% glazing, little added ornament.

     
     
  #685  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 1:21 PM
urbandreamer's Avatar
urbandreamer urbandreamer is offline
recession proof
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,656
Of course I think most Canadian cities should embrace the midrise--ie 5-8s buildings over these highrises. Winnipeg though surely has thousands of older buildings that could be renovated into modern residential before such large scale towers are needed?
     
     
  #686  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 1:32 PM
bmyers bmyers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 29
Fortress Real Developments

Just wanted to introduce myself, I work for Fortress Real Developments (http://fortressrealdevelopments.com/the-team/ben-myers/) and I read forums like these religiously for opinions from locals, and tips on current and future competition.

We appreciate the praise and understand the criticism and skepticism. Understand that the renderings are the "best case scenario", as we understand that the entire Winnipeg CMA has only been completing 200-500 condominium apartments per year (since 2006), and we are proposing 400-500 units in a single building. Trust we have done our due diligence and please note that our builder partner Mady Development has been in business for 40 years with residential and commercial projects in Toronto, Windsor, Dallas, Chicago and Florida.

We hope that Winnipeggers see the value in great projects, as I have witnessed in several markets the increased prices and rents that are achieved in 'signature' projects over traditional or standard projects.

Please let us know what you think we should name the condo: www.liveworkplaywinnipeg.com
     
     
  #687  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 1:47 PM
armorand93's Avatar
armorand93 armorand93 is offline
Transit Nerd
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Calgary (former Winnipegger)
Posts: 2,707
And here comes the PR spokesmen... I'll just start heading to work and see everyone explode when I get back.
     
     
  #688  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 1:52 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmyers View Post
Just wanted to introduce myself, I work for Fortress Real Developments (http://fortressrealdevelopments.com/the-team/ben-myers/) and I read forums like these religiously for opinions from locals, and tips on current and future competition.

We appreciate the praise and understand the criticism and skepticism. Understand that the renderings are the "best case scenario", as we understand that the entire Winnipeg CMA has only been completing 200-500 condominium apartments per year (since 2006), and we are proposing 400-500 units in a single building. Trust we have done our due diligence and please note that our builder partner Mady Development has been in business for 40 years with residential and commercial projects in Toronto, Windsor, Dallas, Chicago and Florida.

We hope that Winnipeggers see the value in great projects, as I have witnessed in several markets the increased prices and rents that are achieved in 'signature' projects over traditional or standard projects.

Please let us know what you think we should name the condo: www.liveworkplaywinnipeg.com
Thank you for this post. I think we all(most of us anyway) realize that this is a best case scenario for the render, and for you to take the time to try to reasure us that this proposal is something that Fortress is 100% behind.

Will fellow posters be able to discuss or ask questions of you in the future or was your post a one time only? Thanx for your opinion.
__________________
♥ ♥
     
     
  #689  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 1:59 PM
JamieDavid Exchange JamieDavid Exchange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmyers View Post
Just wanted to introduce myself, I work for Fortress Real Developments (http://fortressrealdevelopments.com/the-team/ben-myers/) and I read forums like these religiously for opinions from locals, and tips on current and future competition.

We appreciate the praise and understand the criticism and skepticism. Understand that the renderings are the "best case scenario", as we understand that the entire Winnipeg CMA has only been completing 200-500 condominium apartments per year (since 2006), and we are proposing 400-500 units in a single building. Trust we have done our due diligence and please note that our builder partner Mady Development has been in business for 40 years with residential and commercial projects in Toronto, Windsor, Dallas, Chicago and Florida.

We hope that Winnipeggers see the value in great projects, as I have witnessed in several markets the increased prices and rents that are achieved in 'signature' projects over traditional or standard projects.

Please let us know what you think we should name the condo: www.liveworkplaywinnipeg.com
Congratulations on standing your ground. Winnipeg needs a big player to enter the market and take the risk. Someone to "break the centre ice". I'm sure all will agree with me, I really hope it's you guys!
     
     
  #690  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 2:00 PM
bmyers bmyers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 29
I'm not the PR person and I wasn't asked to post on here, I read these forums in my free time (and like many of you on work time!), but I'm happy to answer what I can. Obviously I can't answer questions about potential retailers or commercial tenants until the deals are signed and the announcements are ready to be made.

I can be found on twitter @benmyers29
     
     
  #691  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 2:08 PM
urbandreamer's Avatar
urbandreamer urbandreamer is offline
recession proof
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,656
My proposed name for the tower: The Prairie Icon ... because it reminds me of those grain elevators.

I still wish Mady would use those "other guys" to do the "window dressing."
     
     
  #692  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 2:11 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbandreamer View Post
My proposed name for the tower: The Prairie Icon ... because it reminds me of those grain elevators.
I like the enthusiasm urban, no offense intended, but can we just go to the site bmyers provided for naming the proposal? Thx.
__________________
♥ ♥
     
     
  #693  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 2:16 PM
urbandreamer's Avatar
urbandreamer urbandreamer is offline
recession proof
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,656
Sure you can. I just don't want to do it that way because I'm not buying a condo here :p

I do have historic ties to Winnipeg though that began over a century ago, hence my interest in your market.
     
     
  #694  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 2:36 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
@ Bmyers, the Fortress Media release talked about 400 condo units, but you said in you 1st post 400-500? Why the discrepency from the media release?

Has Fortress purchased the land it is propsing the build on recently/or some time ago?

Do you believe the released render(s) are something that could actually be feasable in Winnipeg?

Any thought's Thx
__________________
♥ ♥
     
     
  #695  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 2:41 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Seems to me that the Fortress project is the shot in the arm this city really needs.
     
     
  #696  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 2:50 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is online now
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,547
speaking of highrises anyone notice that on alt the tower portion apears to be installing forms for a poored slab


also bmyers welcome
     
     
  #697  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 2:51 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Seems to me that the Fortress project is the shot in the arm this city really needs.
At the very least this project can't really do any harm, unlike downtown redevelopment schemes of the past that involved expropriating and demolishing scores of buildings and them handing them over to private developers who ended up building half of what was initially proposed.

Part of me wonders if they wouldn't be better off proposing a more realistically modest project, like perphaps 125 condos over 14 floors and two storeys of commercial space. Then once that sells, build a second phase next door. I love to see Fortress shooting for the stars but the project does seem almost unrealistically ambitious... but then again this is the New Winnipeg™ where anything is possible.
     
     
  #698  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 2:56 PM
rypinion's Avatar
rypinion rypinion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Exchange, Winnipeg
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Part of me wonders if they wouldn't be better off proposing a more realistically modest project, like perphaps 125 condos over 14 floors and two storeys of commercial space.
Whatever happens with their current proposal, I hope afterwards they start to do a bunch of these in Winnipeg (from their website):

http://fortressrealdevelopments.com/...uga-meadows-i/
     
     
  #699  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 2:57 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is online now
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,547
that be a nice infill project
     
     
  #700  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 2:57 PM
bmyers bmyers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrodill View Post
@ Bmyers, the Fortress Media release talked about 400 condo units, but you said in you 1st post 400-500? Why the discrepency from the media release?

Has Fortress purchased the land it is propsing the build on recently/or some time ago?

Do you believe the released render(s) are something that could actually be feasable in Winnipeg?

Any thought's Thx
We are still working on the mix of units here, that is why there is a discrepancy. We are going back and forth on the number of larger units we want to market here. We are also trying to determine how small is too small for Winnipeg. 400 sf works in Toronto, but we don't think Winnipeg is ready for that yet.

The land closed late Thursday night.

IF we didn't think it was feasible, we would not have released it. Again, it is a lot of units to absorb, but we honestly believe that people will buy into the fact that this is a "signature project" which will not be priced outside of the competitive projects.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:24 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.