HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6901  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 2:16 PM
Gresto's Avatar
Gresto Gresto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by koops65 View Post
Here is the diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=85925683

160 Front is #3 on the top 10 list, YSL is still in the demo phase... once it begins shoring and excavation it will be added.
The only vomitous building currently in the top-10 is 160 Front.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6902  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 2:25 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Saturday morning by me...




annnd...


By https://www.instagram.com/flora_vw/
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6903  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 2:38 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Looks like a year left to go on Telus Sky. Could be the first time ever Toronto has the list for itself. The only city that boomed high rises while the rest of the country stagnated was 1990s Vancouver.

Burnaby is about to join the list with Gilmore Place.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexus View Post
By me July 21, 2019
Untitled by Lexus, on Flickr
Untitled by Lexus, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6904  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 3:27 PM
uzi's Avatar
uzi uzi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gresto View Post
The only vomitous building currently in the top-10 is 160 Front.
why is that. its a nice looking building. it is way better than Canada House, Sugar wharf and the prestige.
__________________
RESPECT FOR EVERYONE
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6905  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 4:01 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Maybe he meant it as what could have been?

I agree. The massing is horrid but, It's one of the better towers on this subpar list
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6906  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 4:11 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Burnaby is about to join the list with Gilmore Place.
Too short
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6907  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 4:16 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gresto View Post
The only vomitous building currently in the top-10 is 160 Front.
I love 160 front. Judging by the renders it's cladding will be very striking. I'm also a fan of the mouths.


source: https://s3.amazonaws.com


source: http://gingert.net
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6908  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 4:16 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 25,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gresto View Post
The only vomitous building currently in the top-10 is 160 Front.
160 Front isn't bad imo. Canada House and Sugar Wharf are awful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6909  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 4:30 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 10,950
He probably means that because of the big open mouth on the facade it appears as if it's about to vomit.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6910  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 4:51 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Too short
You're wrong.

It's 214m which is taller than 10 Yorkville.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6911  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 5:48 PM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,528
It's too short to make the 10 tallest list right now... #10 is 216 metres. 214 metres would put it at #12.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6912  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 6:23 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
You're wrong.

It's 214m which is taller than 10 Yorkville.
The first page was last updated April 9. It is not up to date. 160 Front has begun excavating since.

This is the current Top 25 with Two Gilmore
http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=85933548
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6913  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 6:53 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,438
Ok that's why I was confused.

I've actually seen the height of Gilmore Place listed at 216m so it could potentially tie for last place on the list once we get an official height.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6914  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 6:55 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Maybe he meant it as what could have been?

I agree. The massing is horrid but, It's one of the better towers on this subpar list
Yeah it's the bloated massing that wrecks 160 Front for me - it really needs to go on a diet. The height is good and the exterior glazing / cladding in the renders looks nice. The "mouth" just makes me laugh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6915  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 7:08 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
It lost 25 metres and maintain the same girth. The height is the problem here. It's more reasonable than expecting a developer to build a slimmer profile with a shorter tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6916  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 10:13 PM
travis3000's Avatar
travis3000 travis3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Simcoe County, ON
Posts: 6,502
I have always been a fan of 160 Front, I think by the renders it will be a very high quality project. I think it's going to surprise some people once built.

Canada House on the other hand......
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6917  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2019, 2:17 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
stantec is pretty much done. So it is on the list, or it might as well be anyways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6918  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2019, 10:34 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
It will take Telus Sky coming off the list too. Other taller towers will have broken ground by then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6919  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2019, 7:44 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,776
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6920  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2019, 8:15 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 24,923
Not a fan of that cladding on the Stantec podium, it just looks awkward to me and has nothing to do with either the tower or the Arena. The glass in that last shot looks nice though.
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.