HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2022, 4:03 AM
originalmuffins originalmuffins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 876
Well I'll be!

That's a pretty damn good development for that area. Definitely wish it had more street frontage and it had more mixed in retail but the tower design looks nice and it is very very good height there.

I would love to see these go up, it would really make our riverfront skyline look amazing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2022, 10:43 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 25,112
Fengate to build 1,900 rental units at pair of prime Ottawa development sites

Fengate Asset Management says it plans to build more than 1,900 rental housing units at two coveted development sites in Ottawa as the Toronto-based company ramps up its investment in the National Capital Region.

Fengate said earlier this week it has purchased a one-acre site at 1209 St. Laurent Blvd., across from the St. Laurent Shopping Centre, as well as property at 1047 Richmond Rd., a few blocks northwest of the Carlingwood Shopping Centre near an LRT station that’s now under construction.

Fengate says it purchased both parcels of land on behalf of investors that include the LiUNA Pension Fund of Central and Eastern Canada. Terms of the transactions were not disclosed.

Fengate partnered with Montreal-based Canderel Management to buy the St. Laurent Boulevard property from a private vendor in an off-market deal. The firms plan to build a pair of 30-storey apartment towers containing a total of more than 600 rental units in a variety of suite types and sizes.

The site is already zoned for residential construction. Fengate said the companies hope to break ground on the project within the next 12 months.

Growing office sector

“With its proximity to the new (St. Laurent) transit station and retail amenities, along with the growing office sector in Ottawa’s east end, the site presents a great opportunity to introduce new and much-needed rental options in the area,” Jaime McKenna, Fengate’s managing director and group head of real estate, said in an email to OBJ.

It’s the first joint project for Fengate and Canderel. McKenna said the two firms have “aligned interests” to develop highrise residential buildings and were looking for an opportunity to work together.

“After considering different projects to co-develop with Canderel, we finally found the right fit in this transit-oriented site,” she said in an email to OBJ.

In another major deal, Fengate has also purchased a prime development site at 1047 Richmond Rd., where it plans to build three highrises ranging from 36 to 40 storeys that will include about 1,300 rental suites as well as retail space.

Chrysler dealership on site

The land is now occupied by a Chrysler dealership, and Fengate said that business plans to relocate and continue its operations at another site. While residential uses are permitted under current zoning bylaws, Fengate says it plans to seek zoning and Official Plan amendments to accommodate the project’s proposed scale.

The company said there is currently no firm timetable for construction, noting it’s still in the “preliminary stages” of planning the project.

“Acquiring this site on behalf of our investors is in line with our investment strategy to develop residential real estate assets in transit-oriented nodes,” McKenna said. “The adjacent transit station and the numerous urban amenities in the Westboro neighbourhood make this an ideal location to introduce new and enhanced rental supply.”

Fengate says the acquisitions are part of its long-term plan to expand its footprint in the Ottawa market.

The company made its initial foray into the market in 2019, when it partnered with Regional Group on the Greystone Village housing development in Old Ottawa East.

McKenna said the firm sees “significant potential” for further residential development in Ottawa, citing factors such as the capital’s “strong employment fundamentals,” growing population, expanding transit system and tight housing market.

“Even during the most challenging periods of the pandemic, Ottawa’s rental market saw high rental growth and stable vacancy, outperforming many other urban areas,” she said.

https://obj.ca/article/real-estate/r...elopment-sites
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2022, 6:50 AM
originalmuffins originalmuffins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 876
any updates on when this project is going to get approved or not? they said they want to break ground within the next 12 months, which is definitely needed if the 60 floor claridge tower and 900 albert are delayed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2022, 12:42 PM
OTSkyline OTSkyline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,634
On March 23rd, 2022, Councillor Kavanagh hosted a public information meeting on the development at 1047 Richmond Rd.

I wonder how was the comments/reactions and what are next steps.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2022, 1:30 PM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTSkyline View Post
On March 23rd, 2022, Councillor Kavanagh hosted a public information meeting on the development at 1047 Richmond Rd.

I wonder how was the comments/reactions and what are next steps.
It's Ottawa. 99% chance the comments/reactions were exactly the same as they always are. Too tall, kid killing shadows, Too much traffic, Doesn't fit the neighbourhood, blah blah blah blah blah.
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2022, 2:10 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 25,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTSkyline View Post
On March 23rd, 2022, Councillor Kavanagh hosted a public information meeting on the development at 1047 Richmond Rd.

I wonder how was the comments/reactions and what are next steps.
Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2022, 11:45 PM
originalmuffins originalmuffins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 876
any update if these studs are approved or any indication if they will be? checked the devapp and it still looks like its open for comment
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2022, 2:46 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
March 30 2022 document - UDRP presentation

http://webcast.ottawa.ca/plan/All_Im...02-22-0012.PDF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2022, 5:20 PM
DTcrawler DTcrawler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 853
“UDRP recommends less use of glass in favour of beige and charcoal brick to bring the project in line with other developments in the city. Additionally, the panel recommends decreasing the height of all towers to 27 stories so as to decrease the risk of any fatalities due to shadows and craning necks. Finally, it is recommended that the towers be build directly adjacent to one another to form a continuous wall along Richmond Rd.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2022, 5:28 PM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTcrawler View Post
“UDRP recommends less use of glass in favour of beige and charcoal brick to bring the project in line with other developments in the city. Additionally, the panel recommends decreasing the height of all towers to 27 stories so as to decrease the risk of any fatalities due to shadows and craning necks. Finally, it is recommended that the towers be build directly adjacent to one another to form a continuous wall along Richmond Rd.”
IBI Architecture has quite the resume
https://www.ibigroup.com/projects/?text=Residential

If this thing gets RLA'd I would probably reach my final breaking point. You'd find me wild eyed and wandering the halls of the Royal Ottawa muttering about charcoal brick and Roderick Lahey's monochrome computer monitor.
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2022, 5:30 PM
OTSkyline OTSkyline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,634
Please tell me this last post/comment is fake and written as a joke? The city is begging for more height, difference in materials and styles across new developments - but they just want more of the same?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2022, 5:43 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nation's Capital
Posts: 691
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTSkyline View Post
Please tell me this last post/comment is fake and written as a joke? The city is begging for more height, difference in materials and styles across new developments - but they just want more of the same?
Definitely a joke LOL

But who knows, sometimes you can't help but wonder about this city...!?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2022, 7:25 PM
DTcrawler DTcrawler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 853
Yes, it was a joke - sorry to cause any alarm. The fact that it wasn't immediately obvious speaks volumes about how many times we've been hurt in this city.

Agree, Harley, IBI has done some impressive work. My comment was aimed at mocking the UDRP, who I suspect are sometimes guilty themselves of ruining great proposals in favour of "Ottawa-izing" them. Unless I'm completely misunderstanding their mandate or how their review process works.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2022, 2:41 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,893
UDRP Presentation (April 1, 2022)

New Renderings:

















Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2022, 3:09 AM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,743
These three towers would be #2, #3, and #4 in height in Ottawa today after Icon. Unless Trinity breaks ground soon they may well be 2/3/4 by the time they are built as well.
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2022, 3:12 AM
AuxTown's Avatar
AuxTown AuxTown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 4,208
Well-suited to the area, right on top of rapid transit, access to tons of paths and greenspace. This is an excellent project and I love the design! Wonder how they can cheap out on this one?....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2022, 2:18 PM
OTSkyline OTSkyline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,634
I like the scale and the design (the use of glass, the fins, terrace on the podium etc. Great use or prime location directly in front of new LRT station, and the views of the city & river would be amazing.

Really hope this is approved and built as-is. This could be our consolidation prize if Trinity Bayview doesn't go ahead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2022, 2:51 PM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,743
I can't see a project at Bayview not going ahead considering they are still building the ped bridge and integrating it into the O-Train station. They have signed tenants for retail as well. I don't know if it will be called Trinity Centre though, because I'm hypothesizing that Trinity is in the process of selling the project to a bigger developer.
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2022, 4:03 PM
RogueNacho RogueNacho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 269
While I greatly appreciate the architecture, am I the only one who thinks this proposal is kind of crummy? I'm really not a fan of how tight they want to pack those 3 tall towers together without much breathing space or height variation. I'd certainly hate to have my apartment within that inside canyon/well and get virtually no sunlight since the southern most tower will block most of the day's light. Also, that "park space" right at the corner of Richmond and New Orchard seems like such an afterthought, and the renders just make it look like an out of place patch of grass. Are people really going to want to relax in a tiny patch of grass next to a busy intersection?

What would make this proposal better in my opinion is a little more height variation and breathing space. Specifically, I think shrinking the Richmond-fronting tower by at least half to let some light and breathing space in would be a good start. Or better yet, eliminate that south tower all together, and reorient the northern-most tower on a north-south axis on the eastern portion of the site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2022, 4:11 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 25,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogueNacho View Post
While I greatly appreciate the architecture, am I the only one who thinks this proposal is kind of crummy? I'm really not a fan of how tight they want to pack those 3 tall towers together without much breathing space or height variation. I'd certainly hate to have my apartment within that inside canyon/well and get virtually no sunlight since the southern most tower will block most of the day's light. Also, that "park space" right at the corner of Richmond and New Orchard seems like such an afterthought, and the renders just make it look like an out of place patch of grass. Are people really going to want to relax in a tiny patch of grass next to a busy intersection?

What would make this proposal better in my opinion is a little more height variation and breathing space. Specifically, I think shrinking the Richmond-fronting tower by at least half to let some light and breathing space in would be a good start. Or better yet, eliminate that south tower all together, and reorient the northern-most tower on a north-south axis on the eastern portion of the site.
In a city of Rideau canyons, this is pretty good in terms of set-backs. But yeah, it could be improved. What throws me off is the very "office building" architecture.

As for the park, the patch of grass is just a placeholder. Anytime a developer proposes a park on their land (think M+M at Lyon and Albert and the condo building at Byron Place and Churchill), they consult with the public to come up with a functional space after their project is approved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:22 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.