Quote:
Originally Posted by rofina
Better is subjective.
Brentwood is already better - it has a large, fun, open air concept. Ill take that over Metrotown any day.
Plenty of other reasons why M-town might be better for others.
|
So you're basically saying that your reasons for why Brentwood is (already)
"better" (which wasn't even what the original person was claiming)....are basically just as valid (to you) as his (are to him) ..
.....or put another way, just as useless (holistically and objectively speaking) as you're trying to dismiss his as being and make his out to be..
At the end of the day, his reason and justifications are more objective and empirically/factually grounded*.
Metrotown DOES have more foot traffic (and thus, more "life" and "livelihood", if you may) partially by virtue of being a major transit hub - third busiest in the entire Vancouver Metro area (which Brentwood is not), has more parking space and amenities for drivers and driving shoppers. Which are of themselves a consequence of more CRU and retail options and availability from the mall itself and surrounding pockets and areas.
All of which may or may not add up to "
better" depending on who's considering the cases and what else is being factored.
(*it behooves to mention that ,..."
large, fun, open air concept" are as subjective as all get out, in terms of criteria being used to consider whether either is "
better". But you already stated that "Better" itself, is a subjective descriptor, so I suppose the point proves itself.
Also, I think the 'Plenty of other reasons why M-town might be better for others' where in essence the reasons he pointed out, why it in fact is,....for most)