HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5541  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2012, 2:50 PM
Pessimistic Observer Pessimistic Observer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 267
did someone here mention turner field parking as a bad thing
City hopes parking lots around Turner Field could be launching pad for development
http://www.ajc.com/news/business/city-hopes-parking-lots-around-turner-field-could-/nSBM8/

heres hoping this moves faster than other other big projects in atlanta
     
     
  #5542  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2012, 6:23 PM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terminus View Post
If you are concerned about the Walmart PLEASE WRITE YOUR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS (INCLUDING THE THREE AT-LARGE ONES) by this Friday and let them know. The vote is Monday morning.

visit http://citycouncil.atlantaga.gov for email addresses. Better yet, call them!
I wrote a not-so brief email to each city councilman today.

Quote:
Insert name here,

I highly encourage you to take a few things into consideration when deciding the fate of Sembler’s proposed Lindbergh retail development on Monday.

1) Is it sensible that Sembler fit in just enough square footage so as not to have to go before the ARC? Their proposal is an utter slap in the face to the public and to other governing bodies. I believe it is also a slap in the face to City Council as the developer essentially worked the system to be brought before your council I’m assuming because they thought they would have a higher chance that your governing body would approve their silly design. Show them that Council has just as high of standards as the public and as the ARC, and that the Council has the interests of the citizens it represents at heart and can’t be swayed by undue influence.

2) Is this what local residents want? The NPU has already turned the proposal down. Local opposition groups have banded together and as far as I can tell no favorable groups have formed to rally around the idea of having a discount big box store in their neighborhood (Target is there already).

3) Does this fit in with the original concept of Lindbergh Station? See attached JPEG.

4) Does this fit the goals of building sustainable, smart growth TODs around metro stations? There are still plans to make Lindbergh a hub for new rail connecting to Emory/CDC and along the Clifton Corridor. With 3, potentially more, rail lines serving hundreds of thousands of people a day converging at Lindbergh, does it make sense to allow for suburban development patterns? Or does it make more sense to create a dense walkable community that serves transit riders (mainly choice riders in this area).

5) Does this do the city good? Piedmont Road is dangerous enough as it is and everybody is forced to drive on it at least occasionally. Does it make sense to put another big box on the road, especially within a design context not conducive to efficient vehicular traffic patterns mixed in with an increasing amount of pedestrians and even bikers?

6) Can what you approve on Monday be refined, expanded and tweaked to meet the goals in the above 4 questions? Under the current design it does not appear so.

Thanks,
Boy this will be a shame if this goes up right in the middle of Atlanta at what was supposed to be the city's largest TOD.
     
     
  #5543  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2012, 7:27 PM
Zanarkand A East's Avatar
Zanarkand A East Zanarkand A East is offline
Star Blitzer
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 428
     
     
  #5544  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2012, 7:50 PM
ChrisInmanPark ChrisInmanPark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by simms3_redux View Post
I wrote a not-so brief email to each city councilman today.



Boy this will be a shame if this goes up right in the middle of Atlanta at what was supposed to be the city's largest TOD.
Great email! I live in Lindbergh Center and HATE this idea with a passion. Lindbergh is dying a slow death with good retail and restaurants just not being able to take hold. This would be the nail in the coffin. I would also like to write the council members as well. Do you have a link to their names/emails?
     
     
  #5545  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2012, 8:05 PM
testarossa50 testarossa50 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 836
I encourage others to call/write your representatives about this project.

I created an image with some other specific objections:



The jaywalking concern is a grave one.
     
     
  #5546  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2012, 8:35 PM
Dale Dale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,945
Has Atlanta thought about changing the name of the CBD to GSU ? Then you'd have GSU, Midtown and Buckhead.
     
     
  #5547  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2012, 11:24 PM
TarHeelJ TarHeelJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale View Post
Has Atlanta thought about changing the name of the CBD to GSU ? Then you'd have GSU, Midtown and Buckhead.
I don't think GSU has gotten THAT big...although GSU has contributed in several areas, there is still a lot more to downtown than GSU.

(I know you're being facetious by the way)
     
     
  #5548  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2012, 11:38 PM
GThomas's Avatar
GThomas GThomas is offline
Dutton Brown Design
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terminus View Post
If you are concerned about the Walmart PLEASE WRITE YOUR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS (INCLUDING THE THREE AT-LARGE ONES) by this Friday and let them know. The vote is Monday morning.

visit http://citycouncil.atlantaga.gov for email addresses. Better yet, call them!
Terminus, thank you for posting this. I wrote the council and received a personalized response back from Alex Wan saying the following:

Quote:

Thank you for your email.

At Tuesday’s Community Development/Human Resources Committee meeting, I spoke out and voted against approval of the land use change application for the Lindbergh property you mentioned. I share the community’s concerns about the proposed change, and as I stated during the meeting, there was not compelling enough reason for me to support amending the extensive and exhaustive work the community had invested in developing the plan for this area in 2001.

The paper did not receive enough votes for approval and instead has been forwarded to full Council with no recommendation to be decided by all members of Council on Monday, September 17th. Similar action was taken in Zoning Committee this morning on the zoning change application.

I stand firm in my position, and we will see on Monday what the final resolution on this matter will be when all Council members cast their votes.
     
     
  #5549  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2012, 12:20 AM
Terminus's Avatar
Terminus Terminus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisInmanPark View Post
Great email! I live in Lindbergh Center and HATE this idea with a passion. Lindbergh is dying a slow death with good retail and restaurants just not being able to take hold. This would be the nail in the coffin. I would also like to write the council members as well. Do you have a link to their names/emails?
http://citycouncil.atlantaga.gov/

The vote is Monday at 1:00 PM, so if you're writing DO SO OVER THE WEEKEND or they won't get it.

write the 3 at-large: Watson, Willis, and Bond, as well as your own District Councilperson.
__________________
How about this for the city's slogan:

"Atlanta - it's getting there."
     
     
  #5550  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2012, 1:26 AM
Zanarkand A East's Avatar
Zanarkand A East Zanarkand A East is offline
Star Blitzer
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale View Post
Has Atlanta thought about changing the name of the CBD to GSU ? Then you'd have GSU, Midtown and Buckhead.




So glad to see GSU grow, since it brings development and density to downtown.
     
     
  #5551  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2012, 2:56 AM
Zanarkand A East's Avatar
Zanarkand A East Zanarkand A East is offline
Star Blitzer
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pessimistic Observer View Post
did someone here mention turner field parking as a bad thing
City hopes parking lots around Turner Field could be launching pad for development
http://www.ajc.com/news/business/city-hopes-parking-lots-around-turner-field-could-/nSBM8/

heres hoping this moves faster than other other big projects in atlanta
This was posted on another forum:

http://www.arch.gatech.edu/sites/default/files/StadiumPresentationOptimized2.pdf
     
     
  #5552  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2012, 3:14 PM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
Really, though, the Sembler developments and those like it hurt other developers, too. If I were a developer, and I do believe I work for one , I would want complementing uses that drive foot traffic between adjoining places. I think that is why my company only invests in 24 hour gateway markets in dense walkable areas. We can own something on 5th Ave that technically competes with other buildings for office space and competes for retail, but the street name alone helps bring prospective office tenants and retail tenants and certain retailers on the block can really help us push rents. The traffic is obviously there.

Sembler's developments are into and of themselves and do absolutely nothing for the areas they are in. Never was a fan of Town. Ugh If Cinebistro weren't there I wouldn't have to deal with it, but I think there is one point of ingress/egress for the whole development and the retail is isolated and secluded inside the development. Of course the area is suburban and rail is across the street, but Lindbergh is an area that has a chance to develop like Rosslyn/Ballston corridor in DC and should be given that chance.
     
     
  #5553  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2012, 3:57 PM
atlantaguy's Avatar
atlantaguy atlantaguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Area code 404
Posts: 3,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by simms3_redux View Post
Really, though, the Sembler developments and those like it hurt other developers, too. If I were a developer, and I do believe I work for one , I would want complementing uses that drive foot traffic between adjoining places. I think that is why my company only invests in 24 hour gateway markets in dense walkable areas. We can own something on 5th Ave that technically competes with other buildings for office space and competes for retail, but the street name alone helps bring prospective office tenants and retail tenants and certain retailers on the block can really help us push rents. The traffic is obviously there.

Sembler's developments are into and of themselves and do absolutely nothing for the areas they are in. Never was a fan of Town. Ugh If Cinebistro weren't there I wouldn't have to deal with it, but I think there is one point of ingress/egress for the whole development and the retail is isolated and secluded inside the development. Of course the area is suburban and rail is across the street, but Lindbergh is an area that has a chance to develop like Rosslyn/Ballston corridor in DC and should be given that chance.
Just curious here, but does your company consider Atlanta to be a 24 hour gateway market? I would assume so, since they are the developer of record for Ponce City Market.

As far as Town, I pretty much agree with you. I think it will get better as they add more residential (which is underway). BTW, there is a second access point to Peachtree just north of the Costco, adjacent to Oglethorpe.
     
     
  #5554  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 12:45 AM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
What on earth makes you think I work for Jamestown? LoL I'd be honored if I did, but I don't and I will choose to remain as anonymous as everyone else on this board (though I can guess where some work ). I would presume that Jamestown does not consider Atlanta a 24 hour gateway market much in the same way nobody else does. All of their Atlanta assets are in opportunistic retail funds, not core funds. All of their core/core plus assets are in NYC, DC, Boston and the Bay Area, all of which are considered gateway markets and have 24 hour CBDs, major ports of entry, international tourism, heavy immigration, very high barriers to entry, etc etc.

Portland, OR is more of a gateway market and a 24 hour market than Atlanta. So is Denver at this point, and possibly even Austin. Atlanta is just falling so far behind, it's depressing to travel elsewhere and return. I hope we can get our act together and I hope that City Council sends a message this Monday.
     
     
  #5555  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 1:34 AM
atlantaguy's Avatar
atlantaguy atlantaguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Area code 404
Posts: 3,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by simms3_redux View Post
What on earth makes you think I work for Jamestown? LoL I'd be honored if I did, but I don't and I will choose to remain as anonymous as everyone else on this board (though I can guess where some work ).
I just put two and two together from your posts - including where you travel to, the projects you seem to have intimate knowledge of (including other cities) and the fact that you have mentioned that you work in the NW but will be moving intown next year. Sorry if I was out of bounds here....I have met and know several forumers here and know where a couple work - it's no big deal.

I appreciate and enjoy your contributions to the forum, nevertheless.

As far as us falling behind certain cities that aren't even in our tier, I have learned over the years to never underestimate Atlanta. Friends that visit from other areas of the country are continually blown away by the place, and quite a few are from the "gateway cities."
     
     
  #5556  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 2:26 AM
jpk1292000 jpk1292000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by simms3_redux View Post
What on earth makes you think I work for Jamestown? LoL I'd be honored if I did, but I don't and I will choose to remain as anonymous as everyone else on this board (though I can guess where some work ). I would presume that Jamestown does not consider Atlanta a 24 hour gateway market much in the same way nobody else does. All of their Atlanta assets are in opportunistic retail funds, not core funds. All of their core/core plus assets are in NYC, DC, Boston and the Bay Area, all of which are considered gateway markets and have 24 hour CBDs, major ports of entry, international tourism, heavy immigration, very high barriers to entry, etc etc.

Portland, OR is more of a gateway market and a 24 hour market than Atlanta. So is Denver at this point, and possibly even Austin. Atlanta is just falling so far behind, it's depressing to travel elsewhere and return. I hope we can get our act together and I hope that City Council sends a message this Monday.
I think it's pretty hard to argue that Portland, OR, Denver and Austin are more significant business centers and ports of entry than Atlanta. While I'm disappointed to see the failure of the TSPLOST, I find it hard to argue that Portland, Denver and Austin are more "worldly" than Atlanta. Maybe in Hipster quota, but not in commerce and transportation.
     
     
  #5557  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 4:49 AM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpk1292000 View Post
I think it's pretty hard to argue that Portland, OR, Denver and Austin are more significant business centers and ports of entry than Atlanta. While I'm disappointed to see the failure of the TSPLOST, I find it hard to argue that Portland, Denver and Austin are more "worldly" than Atlanta. Maybe in Hipster quota, but not in commerce and transportation.
In many ways Portland is a better real estate investment than Atlanta. Here's why:

1) Higher barriers to entry
2) Much stricter regulation on development, zoning, etc to prevent cycles and unsustainable growth/development patterns
3) Direct connections internationally and domestic (not as many as ATL obviously) and large port
4) 18-24 hour submarkets
5) Awesome city, regional and state leadership focused on the details and attracting the right people to the city (young, educated, progressive, active)
6) Very effective public transportation and very friendly to alternative modes of transit (arguably the most bike friendly city in America)
7) Much better leadership on the state, regional and local level

Midtown Atlanta is sort of a sluggish 18 hour market with scarce amenities, retail options, etc compared to similar submarkets in other cities. Portland's CBD has essentially the equivalent of Lenox Square in retail in the ground floors of its buildings. There is constant foot traffic in and around downtown Portland, and people want to live and be there or adjacent in really cool and well connected neighborhoods. Very young city.

I can say all the same things about Denver, but amplified. Additionally, their airport is HUGE and can take you anywhere. They are well connected by rail. The city is planned VERY well and there are very progressive development/zoning regulations that dissuade sprawl and encourage density, integration, TODs, etc. Currently the city is spending BILLIONs to enhance and expand its fixed-rail transit system, and this money includes the redevelopment of Union Station into a multimodal hub far far far superior than anything even discussed in Atlanta. It's UC right now and will connect all modes of transportation, will include top notch retail and restaurants, and is well situated between the CBD and an adjacent infill neighborhood.

Let these photos speak to Denver:

There are 53 of these in the city:
source: Elements of Urbanism: Denver




This is the infill going up EVERYWHERE in these 3 cities. Imagine one day Atlanta seeing the same kind of product.



More photos here: Elements of Urbanism: Denver

Austin is much smaller, but is urbanizing and progressing so fast it is already a more "advanced" real estate market than Atlanta. Consider that rents for the same product in Austin's CBD are 20-25% higher than in Midtown Atlanta. I have heard through the grapevine that Skyhouse Austin rents will be about 20% higher than Skyhouse Atlanta rents...same building. Also, not sure of Skyhouse Austin's parking situation, but I noticed in its rendering a garage like the one here was not included. It's just a more advanced market, growing much faster, attracting far more young professionals, much more educated, etc etc. Obviously a lot of developers/investors want to make plays there. Atlanta based Cousins is all but out of its hometown right now, but is going big in Austin.

And then there is the question of how good Atlanta is for young SINGLE professionals and those looking to stay that way for a while? Up for debate.

Here are two more scenes from Denver with associated quotes, same source:


Quote:
The spectacle of Denver Cruiser Rides was a show not to be missed. Each year the Cruisers announce the zany costume themes for the bike cruises which take place on "Bike Ride Wednesday."

The themes for 2012 included some tried and true favorites — officially referred to as DCR Traditions — such as the Ship o’ Fools (a.k.a. pirates, sea men and nymphs, Sept. 19) and what a Denver Post writer likes to call the Ghetto Robots (bubble wrap, duct tape and cardboard, June 20). There are also some retreads of themes from previous years, like the footie-pajama-friendly Slumber Party (June 6) and rolling Super Diamond concert known as Disco night (May 30).

There, on the horizon, is a semi-coherent swarm of rainbow afro wigs, pirate hats, spandex and pink tutus. It smells of booze, legal cannabis, and bicycle grease, sweat and tears, and by the time the bike-riding blob has overtaken you, it’s too late: you’re part of a Denver Cruiser Ride.

Quote:
The Cruiser Rides end up at Civic Center Park, seen here at about midnight. Down front a DJ or band has the music cranked up, a pall of thick musty smoke hovers above the crowd, and down there in the blur, in the middle of the photo is a rapidly spinning 'Denver Cruiser Riders Circle of Death'. An amazing feat of stoned femininity and drunken machismo, performed with the zeal and purpose of a fraternity pledge gone way wrong.

Quote:
The jovial party atmosphere in nighttime Denver was illustrated by this scene where 5 college age passengers boarded the bus and announced to everyone that it was their friends birthday, the entire bus then broke into singing 'Happy Birthday'. As it turned out, birthday girl was on a scavenger hunt sponsored by her friends, one of the 'items' she had to collect was a bus full of strangers singing happy birthday... mission accomplished.
I'm so jaded from traveling and photo threads online on boards like this. We are just so far behind. I hope you can understand what I mean by smaller cities behaving more and more like larger coastal gateway markets. Atlanta does not function like a gateway market even though its airport is a large gateway (more of a connection airport than an O&D airport, and not huge on cargo or international flights like MIA).

To me a quality observation of whether or not you're in a gateway market is if when you walk around on public sidewalks you hear all sorts of languages being spoken. I walk Midtown sidewalks every day, and often I'm pretty alone on them, but when there are people it's not a conglomerate of foreigners, shoppers, hustling bankers, etc. Cities like Boston, Chicago and SF are so European to me...filled with Europeans. Of course NYC is filled with everybody. Recently I read an article on immigration in Atlanta and how the metro is so atypical in that immigrants who come here move to the burbs and don't always form communities like a Koreatown or Little Italy, etc. The city/metro doesn't behave at all like a 5 million person city. More like a behind the times 3 million person sprawling sunbelt metro. It forms its own appeal to people, hence the metro's growth over the past 3 decades, but I think it has come to an end. We have reached a breaking point. Our metro's/city's way of being is literally opposite to a gateway market's, or to smaller gateway wannabe's like Denver, Austin and Portland.
     
     
  #5558  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 7:22 AM
L41A's Avatar
L41A L41A is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Peace Up, A-Town Down
Posts: 926
Quote:
Originally Posted by simms3_redux View Post
What on earth makes you think I work for Jamestown? LoL I'd be honored if I did, but I don't and I will choose to remain as anonymous as everyone else on this board (though I can guess where some work ). I would presume that Jamestown does not consider Atlanta a 24 hour gateway market much in the same way nobody else does. All of their Atlanta assets are in opportunistic retail funds, not core funds. All of their core/core plus assets are in NYC, DC, Boston and the Bay Area, all of which are considered gateway markets and have 24 hour CBDs, major ports of entry, international tourism, heavy immigration, very high barriers to entry, etc etc.

Portland, OR is more of a gateway market and a 24 hour market than Atlanta. So is Denver at this point, and possibly even Austin. Atlanta is just falling so far behind, it's depressing to travel elsewhere and return. I hope we can get our act together and I hope that City Council sends a message this Monday.
What are you doing to deal with that depression? Are you not going to travel elsewhere and just stay in Atlanta? Or why are you returning to Atlanta?

It ain't really none of my business nor do I do really care. But it's just a pet peeve of mine when folks wallow in something that is not good for them, continue to do it, and complain about it. I've read two of your posts complaining about returning to Atlanta and being depressed .. even complaining about trees in two of your posts that I read. Maybe Atlanta is just not for you.
     
     
  #5559  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 2:25 PM
atlantaguy's Avatar
atlantaguy atlantaguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Area code 404
Posts: 3,333
simms3 - I get where you are coming from, I really do. When I was just a little older than you, I used to travel non-stop for Amex all over the place. I too was ready to move to all of the great places I used to go to, particularly the West Coast cities. They are completely different from what you know growing up in the East/South, and I get it.

However, I stand by my belief that they are a mere shadow of Atlanta when it comes to the corporate & travel presence of each. None of the three you mention are even half the size of metro Atlanta, and the dynamics of each could not be more different in just about every way. Portland has suffered for years with high unemployment, and is seen as very business unfriendly. There is a reason so many Phd's are waiting tables there. Their office market is a mere sliver of ours. Flights in and out are subpar for a metro of over 2 million, partially because they live in Seattle's shadow.

As far as Denvers huge airport goes, do you realize what is was patterned after? Our very own Hartsfield. And no, you can NOT get anywhere from there - they don't even have nonstops to Tokyo yet. They're finally getting them next spring. They have a tiny number of flights to Europe, while we have a complete network that is ranked up there with cities much larger than Atlanta. They also have absolutely zero flights to anywhere in South America, while we have an extremely impressive and growing network from here. While true that our O&D numbers are dwarfed by our connecting numbers, our O&D numbers are 30-35 million a year which absolutely blows Denver out of the water. Never underestimate the power and influence of having the worlds busiest airport in our backyard. An airport that happens to be connected by HEAVY rail transit with a single seat ride to 3 of our 4 primary business centers. We are also a top 5 convention and meetings city, with over 90,000 hotel rooms in the metro. Look up a list of all the Consulates here to see just how globally connected we are.

My whole point with all of this is that you seem to really be selling us short. We have the size, critical mass and business infrastructure and connectivity that these other cities can only DREAM of.

Last edited by atlantaguy; Sep 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM. Reason: Spelling
     
     
  #5560  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 2:56 PM
jpk1292000 jpk1292000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by simms3_redux View Post
In many ways Portland is a better real estate investment than Atlanta. Here's why:

1) Higher barriers to entry
2) Much stricter regulation on development, zoning, etc to prevent cycles and unsustainable growth/development patterns
3) Direct connections internationally and domestic (not as many as ATL obviously) and large port
4) 18-24 hour submarkets
5) Awesome city, regional and state leadership focused on the details and attracting the right people to the city (young, educated, progressive, active)
6) Very effective public transportation and very friendly to alternative modes of transit (arguably the most bike friendly city in America)
7) Much better leadership on the state, regional and local level

Midtown Atlanta is sort of a sluggish 18 hour market with scarce amenities, retail options, etc compared to similar submarkets in other cities. Portland's CBD has essentially the equivalent of Lenox Square in retail in the ground floors of its buildings. There is constant foot traffic in and around downtown Portland, and people want to live and be there or adjacent in really cool and well connected neighborhoods. Very young city.

I can say all the same things about Denver, but amplified. Additionally, their airport is HUGE and can take you anywhere. They are well connected by rail. The city is planned VERY well and there are very progressive development/zoning regulations that dissuade sprawl and encourage density, integration, TODs, etc. Currently the city is spending BILLIONs to enhance and expand its fixed-rail transit system, and this money includes the redevelopment of Union Station into a multimodal hub far far far superior than anything even discussed in Atlanta. It's UC right now and will connect all modes of transportation, will include top notch retail and restaurants, and is well situated between the CBD and an adjacent infill neighborhood.

Let these photos speak to Denver:

There are 53 of these in the city:
source: Elements of Urbanism: Denver




This is the infill going up EVERYWHERE in these 3 cities. Imagine one day Atlanta seeing the same kind of product.



More photos here: Elements of Urbanism: Denver

Austin is much smaller, but is urbanizing and progressing so fast it is already a more "advanced" real estate market than Atlanta. Consider that rents for the same product in Austin's CBD are 20-25% higher than in Midtown Atlanta. I have heard through the grapevine that Skyhouse Austin rents will be about 20% higher than Skyhouse Atlanta rents...same building. Also, not sure of Skyhouse Austin's parking situation, but I noticed in its rendering a garage like the one here was not included. It's just a more advanced market, growing much faster, attracting far more young professionals, much more educated, etc etc. Obviously a lot of developers/investors want to make plays there. Atlanta based Cousins is all but out of its hometown right now, but is going big in Austin.

And then there is the question of how good Atlanta is for young SINGLE professionals and those looking to stay that way for a while? Up for debate.

Here are two more scenes from Denver with associated quotes, same source:









I'm so jaded from traveling and photo threads online on boards like this. We are just so far behind. I hope you can understand what I mean by smaller cities behaving more and more like larger coastal gateway markets. Atlanta does not function like a gateway market even though its airport is a large gateway (more of a connection airport than an O&D airport, and not huge on cargo or international flights like MIA).

To me a quality observation of whether or not you're in a gateway market is if when you walk around on public sidewalks you hear all sorts of languages being spoken. I walk Midtown sidewalks every day, and often I'm pretty alone on them, but when there are people it's not a conglomerate of foreigners, shoppers, hustling bankers, etc. Cities like Boston, Chicago and SF are so European to me...filled with Europeans. Of course NYC is filled with everybody. Recently I read an article on immigration in Atlanta and how the metro is so atypical in that immigrants who come here move to the burbs and don't always form communities like a Koreatown or Little Italy, etc. The city/metro doesn't behave at all like a 5 million person city. More like a behind the times 3 million person sprawling sunbelt metro. It forms its own appeal to people, hence the metro's growth over the past 3 decades, but I think it has come to an end. We have reached a breaking point. Our metro's/city's way of being is literally opposite to a gateway market's, or to smaller gateway wannabe's like Denver, Austin and Portland.
This is a debate that can go in circles ad infinitum. I was in Denver for a few days three years ago and I thought it was nice, but I wasn't blown away. The city was undoubtedly doing more to develop a light rail/streetcar system than Atlanta. But from a shopping and dining standpoint, it seemed about 2/3 as far along as Atlanta. The depth of the dining scene seemed less than Atlanta's, and the city seemed to lack the diversity of interesting neighborhoods that Atlanta has. The city's population was less racially diverse, though "white Hipsters" made up a more obvious percentage of the population than in Atlanta. This situation was similar to what I observed in Portland back in 2006. The airport in Denver is big, but probably services with direct flights about 1/5 of the international destinations that Hartsfield does.

I like Atlanta, but I'm well aware of its warts. Every city has them. In the particular case of Atlanta, this city needs to start moving forward with creating and implementing a comprehensive transportation plan, and do it very soon. But, my company also has offices in SF and Boston, and we do a lot of business travel. The folks in SF and Boston are extremely jealous of our airport and the non-stop flights available to nearly anywhere on the planet, particularly on a single airline. And the ability to live in a nice place in the city here and still afford to have a car for weekend getaways without having a big trust fund is also a huge benefit that visitors from NYC and SF mention over and over. Maybe I'm incorrectly equating "world city" with gateway city, but I think putting Portland, Austin and Denver with Atlanta in the same class is kind of a stretch.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.