I agree with both of you in regards to the shipbuilding contract being hammered in stone, but i don't think it will be a contentious election issue.
Counterfactual, I usually agree with many of your posts but being an individual that has worked in the oil and gas industry in Alberta and seen first hand the effects on environments, if unchecked. The real issue in Nova Scotia's energy portfolio is not its onshore capabilities but off-shore. The 2 parcels that Shell and BP are after are not natural gas which is at historic lows in North America but oil. Each maybe larger than White Rose or Hibernia. Meaning at a $100 plus a barrel could be more wind in the sails. If we could only focus on the positive, positives that in other jurisdictions, would be celebrated and built upon. But all the positives get mired in the reminders of the failed attempts before. We've become afraid to fail in this city and province. So afraid that we don't even try.
Was I the only one when reminded of the medal count in Scotland cringed at the opportunity lost to leave a legacy of infrastructure for sports and entertainment. It definitely would have filled the hole in this summers entertainment schedule which has been pretty dull since Sam Roberts and until the upcoming Dropkick Murphys show. I've had to improvise with alot of company from abroad that want to do things while visiting.
Ultimately the impressive stadium was a go already and would have been built and we're still debating here if a city of 400 000 people with a catchment area of 3 million within 6 hours drive of here deserves a stadium?!