Quote:
Originally Posted by BlindFatSnake
Atlanta is supposedly a global city; therefore, any major city would be its peer.
|
Wrong. Our peer cities are Dallas, Houston & Miami. Our rail ridership is more than all three COMBINED.
Quote:
Cities with superior heavy rail systems:
NYC, Chicago, D.C., Boston, San Francisco, Philly, and Jersey City.
|
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!! ALL of which with the exception of Jersey City are MUCH larger and all of them are much older than Atlanta. Jersey City does have PATH, but it wouldn't have jack if it wasn't across the Hudson from Manhattan - so you are basically talking New York here. Really? And NO U.S. city has the Federal largesse that D.C. has. Total fail, on all points.
Quote:
Cities that are expanding their rail systems with heavy rail, light rail, and or commuter rail:
NYC, Chicago, D.C. Boston, San Francisco, Philly, Newark, St. Louis, Denver, Seattle, Miami, Ft. Lauderdale, Charlotte, Norfolk, Tucson, Salt Lake City, Houston, Dallas, Phoenix, Portland, Sacramento, Jersey City, Los Angeles, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Nashville, Memphis, etc.
|
And yet again, MARTA rail transports more than ANY of these places after the first 6 you list, all of which are much, much larger and older than Atlanta. All of the first 6 were also big cities before there were these things called CARS. The rest of this strange grab-bag of places range from doing nothing more than adding small streetcar lines just like we are Downtown (Ft. Lauderdale & Tucson), to a fair amount that are facing massive funding shortfalls. Denver may have to go back to the voters for a new tax. Charlotte is having massive funding issues, and had to substantially shorten the ONE light rail line they plan to extend. Miami just now finally connected the airport to Metro, but they are totally broke and can't bulid anything new anywhere. They are basically done.
Several of the others are doing okay - but NONE, zilch are building heavy rail with the exception of D.C. and L.A. (and almost all of L.A.'s lines are light rail, a far inferior system to what we have in heavy rail).
Nashville has a single line of commuter rail that nobody rides, and is basically considered a joke. There are no plans there for any rail there, they have decided to go with BRT instead. And please enlighten us with just what Memphis has planned.
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about here.
Quote:
When was the last time JAWGA added any time of mass rail transit to its arsenal of roads? Answer: the year 2000 (some 12 years ago), and without any future plans to add any type of rail. Yet they promoised to build a multi-modal station downtown.
That's like building your 6 year old a garage and telling him in 10 years he can put hid own car in it. There is no commuter rail for a yet-to-be-built multimodal station.
|
It's a concept called "planning for the future" in case you aren't familiar with it. The MMPT will tie together already existing transportation - GRTA Express, CCT, GCT, Greyhound, Amtrak and seemlessly blend in with MARTA. Don't bet on commuter rail and High Speed Rail not happening. The Feds have designated us as the Hub for SE HSR, and it will eventually happen. Why do you think well respected nationally known firms competed to be a part of this massive project?
Quote:
Just smoke and mirrors in JAWGA, and everybody in the world sees the ATL's bull$hit for what it is.
|
More bitter, mindless bullshit.
Quote:
|
Rail is the solution... In 2014 we'll be staring rail in the face and the world will be watching to see if we act in accordance with other large metros.
|
This makes no sense at all - you must be typing fast on your phone or something. If you think that the powers that be around here are going to let the state hold us back, you know nothing of our history here. Atlanta has never been a place to rest on its laurels, and I don't see that changing.
One more time - many, MANY places around the country would KILL for what we already have in MARTA (including Seattle at the top of the list). Are you aware that they voted overwhelming AGAINST rail in the 70's, and we got their pot of money to build MARTA? Now they are playing catch up, and it is costing them 5-6 times what it should have - for LRT, no less.
You are doing nothing but beating a dead horse here, yet again...............